When I had my business, I built Jim's only 2 "hot rods". They were the "hottest" in the county and beyond. I accompanied Jim on most of his trophy winning races.

Jim's first job was as a milkman. He delivered milk to my home and my wife often prepared breakfast for him. We had tons of great times together but I lost track of him when I moved to Chicago. My sister told me he joined the State Police. As an honorable man, he was a credit to that service and later retired as a Captain.

Through the years, we both got to know each other's political philosophy and they ran parallel most of the time. Jim joined the police mainly for the benefits. He always thought ahead and retirement certainly must have entered his mind. Secondly, from what I gathered, he liked helping people in his community. Like all such people, military included, they are "company" men and will follow orders no matter what the source, as long as they recognize it as legitimate. If authority requires him to take a position against White people, I would be very surprised if he didn't. This type of man is the concrete of which any society is made.

When we enter the political domain, this sort of person is rarely seen when we speak of dissent, albeit within legal parameters. An "institution man" -- in the service of the government whether military, civil service, or elected --  will rarely go beyond prescribed parameters and if he is receiving a pension, he certainly will not bite the hand which feeds him. Once ZOG has a person dependent upon it, for any reason, it has a subject.

A long time colleague recently died. He taught the "holocaust" in a large school but believed very little of what he taught. He needed the job to support his family and keep the debt collector from his door. I certainly would not ask him to jeopardize his job by not doing as he was told -- teaching horseshit as fact. Most of society is like this -- locked in by necessity. So, it's only when people feel they have nothing to lose is when they will fight and when leaders are born. This is why ZOG is frantically trying to keep its dying empire alive. It FEARS the people with very good reason. It was justly earned! As ZOG gets more and more frantic, expect it to lock up more and more of its citizens on false, or greatly exaggerated and skewed charges. Congress is little other than a machine mass producing laws and all tyrannies can be measured by the number of its laws. No law is any better than those who support it. The Constitution appears to have lost people who wish to defend it.  History will record it as another failed experiment. MLK fought against what he considered "unjust laws" and it behooves White people to reflect upon that for their time "in the barrel" is coming.

This same periodical previously ran a revealing article -- Hitler, the Homosexual.

My, but that man sure gets around. He's got something for everybody. No wonder Germany lost the war. They were too busy gassing jews while their leader was chasing every orifice under the Hakenkreuz.

I will always shoot from the hip, without fear or favor. If I think you have cancer, I'll let you know. I do not admire the Dale Carnegie types. 

You can't keep a good jew down. Remember the American "Nazi" Frankie Collin (Cohn), Chicago I believe? As I understand, he was accused of having young boys as playmates in his version of hide-and-seek. Well, he's popped up again on some 'save the earth' committee as Frank Joseph.

If Ernst Zündel had a scheduled immigration hearing, he'd have been there. Of that, I am certain. He fled Germany to avoid being drafted. He is a committed pacifist. That's why he chose Canada. They had no draft but the US did. One thing I can say about this likable fellow is that he has been consistently me! me! me! I wish him well and advise everyone to turn over their possessions to him; leave him in their wills; and be sure to donate at least $500 per month to his nation-saving operation. It is a business, you should know. He was warned, concerning his current problem, by Eric, but ego-heads listen to no one except perhaps, their female jewish advisors.

Trust no career military officer, retired or active. They are dyed-in-the-wool ZOGlings regardless of what they say. Listen long enough and they will reveal their ZOGling nature. Many have great things to say but if you trust one of them, it is to your own peril. Any retired military, especially the officers where pensions are the largest, are still tied umbilically to the establishment. They cannot make unfriendly public noises about ZOG out of fear of losing all, or part, of their pensions. Unlike civilian pensions, the military has "ways" to punish a dissenter by altering his pension. I know of no man, no matter how patriotic or bellicose he appears, who will do anything to jeopardize his "welfare" payment. Buyer beware.

Trust no one who has relatives, spouses, or friends, from "Russia" for those people will be jews in nearly all cases. Be suspect of anyone who travels freely to Odessa, Moscow, and whatever. By her own admission, the Zud's 3rd wife has roots in Odessa and her father "... came from a distant Jewish family." (The Furies and the Flame.) Remember my fictional character Ernie Zudmeyer? There's much more here but I'll leave that to those who have a psychological need to be taken advantage of. Pain is always the better teacher. That's why I remain forever eager to have people experience it firsthand. If they cannot learn from bad experience, then they are hopeless.

Never marry any person until you know their families. Never form any sort of organization, or agreement, with anyone until you know their family. Nearly each person on the Internet is a total stranger to the other. If you wouldn't trust a stranger you meet face-to-face while crossing the Mississippi, then why would you trust some Internet dabbler in patriotism using a false name and having a face you never saw? I am in Eric's boat -- we KNOW things. But if our words of warning are not sufficient, then why would you accept our sources? As any diligent father asks his daughter's boyfriend how he earns his living, I would suggest that you ask your recent Internet blightwing partner how he earns his -- and then check on it. If you desire disease-free sex, then an "easy make" is not the way to go. Years ago, I told four men I knew that I wouldn't have sex with 'hot bod' Dorothy Y.. I never said more than that but later those who got herpes and gonorrhea, swore at me because I didn't tell them she was diseased. I knew because I was a close companion to a certain laboratory technician at the time. That I would not reveal. Only Gene E. took my indirect advice. I received a fine steak dinner for that.

I really do not care if the Confederate flag is banned from public display. Southerners have a long record of being overly friendly to non-Whites. In fact, I have yet to meet one southerner who does not appreciate his surrounding Blacks. Their presence reminds them of the "good old days" and serves to enhance their feelings of superiority.

Let's take a group, any group, family neighborhood, whatever. In America, little is respected or more sought after than money. With this in mind it is a corollary that those with the biggest wallets control things, just as the poker player with the most money usually wins. In the family, the person who controls is usually dad since he normally supplies the most bucks. It's no accident that our farcical election entertainment is a rich man's game. When we consider the disastrous WWII events, which side had the most money and cannon fodder? The Allies by a 20:1 margin. Some pundits claimed that Germany could have won that war if Russia had stayed out. That's quite a complement considering the population numbers and money resources, but I have my doubts. Russia, prior to the Hoover and Roosevelt hand-outs, was an economic basket case and without US tax-payers, they'd never have risen above the potato field level. Russian jews ruined Russia and American jews built the Russian war machine. A superior man might hold his own against 6 uglies but when confronted by 20 of them, he will fall. That's the story of Germany's military defeat.

As we consider that wondrous peace-on-earth-goodwill-towards-men outfit called the UN, which participating country has the deepest wells of money? Once you answer that you'll know who is running the whole show. The League of Nations failed because the US pulled out and it pulled out because at that time the American sucker was not brain-washed enough and the wallet was a little on the thin side. With stolen German technology and the gold which was separated from the British as a result of WWII, the US marched forward as the boy with the fattest wallet. The US only supports the UN because it controls it -- bribe to bribe and threat to threat. The UN is just like student government in a school which makes the participants feel like they are important but if anything the UN does meets with USZOG disapproval, the US will ignore it and bomb something. USZOG cares no more about "national sovereignty", "self determination", and other folderol, than it does for the right of an American to choose whom he shall associate with, or do business with. Forced integration -- forced everything! -- is not just a community objective. USZOG fully intends it world-wide. I wrote this in 1964 (The Crystal Ball) and I have not changed my view one iota because no one has come forward to offer one single event which contradicts it.

I know shit when I see it. It has the same color and smell as it did 40 years ago.

I remain somewhat confused as to what "innocent civilians" means. Are there 'guilty civilians'? If so, guilty of what? It not only was OK to kill civilians during the WWII air attacks on Germany, but a declared objective to kill as many as possible. Some even advised wholesale extermination after the war, like the jew Morgenthau. Now we are preparing to kill scores of civilians in Iraq and other areas. Are they "innocent" civilians? Or are they guilty of having a leader we claim "enslaved" them?

Killing is good -- as long as it's the other fellow. I'll drink to that.

As long as the clowns who run this asylum cannot give specifics, I'll carry on as usual -- carrying out the garbage, feeding the birds, as so forth.

I recently sprayed my back yard with DuPont's Anti Terrorist Emulsion (DATE). It certainly works since they are no terrorists in my lilacs.

A radio mouth replied relative to "What should we do with Michael Jackson?" A caller suggested ventilating his head with a Colt 45. The Marxist mouth shouted, "I cannot condone such a terrorist attack!" Pretty soon a terrorist will be anyone who sprinkles itching powder on someone's toilet powder.

What a wunnerful. thing, this digital graphics invention is. If people can get their jollies just by looking at virtual images, then wouldn't this be a way to solve the world's food, and hunger, problem? Imagine, Thurgood Nofood sitting at his keyboard munching on images of roast turkey and beef stroganoff. With smell and taste enhancement software, he could eat to his stomach's content. Later perhaps, computer technology could offer us virtual breathing so that we could dispose of the atmosphere altogether thus canceling our concern about ozone hole pollution.

The popularity of TV "food" shows clearly indicates that Americans are no longer interested in eating anything which used to be called food. They don't want to eat a potato which tastes, and looks, like a potato but insist that it be spiced, garnished and otherwise altered so as to hide its real identity. More "essence", as I have heard. In the past, spices were popular as a means of preserving food and as a way of eating inedible rot by masking it's taste. We apparently haven't  progressed very far from the days of Marco Polo. In fact, he just opened up another pizzeria down the street. In a restaurant, one cannot get a plate of anything without the required sprinkles, green plastic shoots and dribbles of tasteless sauce which helps to make your plate appear as a 6th grade surrealist art project. It's called "presentation", which appears to be of greater value than the taste of what you are consuming. Here again, what meets the eye actually impresses upon the brain unreality. It's magic. If you cannot tell by the taste what you are eating, then that's a recipe to guard with secrecy.

We thus indicate, by our behavior, that we indeed do hate reality and so there is a need to destroy everything found within sight and hearing. Blow it up -- cover it over -- that's development! That's progress. The reductio ad absurdum of this is complete global destruction.

A "camping trip" has nothing to do with nature or camping. One fills his "bus" with everything moveable in the house, and then drives off, with kids playing hockey in the back seats, to some "camping site" where he plugs his TV, lights, computer, and refrigerator into available sockets. Instead of diving in some beautiful lake, they are compelled to drive to an artificial dent in the ground called a "public pool" where all have a jolly good time sloshing about in diluted urine. If there's not a Burger King withing 500 yeards, then the whole camping trip is ruined. Man, life is tough, ain't it?

The next demonstration was with the new body shields complete with mirrors, flood light and shock absorbing handles. With it, a helmet is used which resembles something out of Star Wars. "Complete protection" was announced. Knowing that I am a devil's advocate, Lt. C. asked my opinion if I saw one of these so prepared officers approaching me -- assuming I am John Dillinger,  'machine-gun' Kelly or Saddam carrying a nuke under his arm. I replied that in days of old, when knights were cold, assaults never took place against armor, per se, but against the cracks between the plates. Thus, I'd blow the fellow's feet off and as he dropped, I'd blast off an unprotected arm followed by whatever other body parts not so protected, such as the back of his head. This recalled an demonstration about two years ago, when they gave me a ball bat and asked that I smack a fully plastic-armored officer with it to see if I could hurt him. I at first refused stating that I never get into any fight because I never do battle for sport. My full intent would be to kill the fellow, otherwise, I take a hike. After much ridicule, I complied. There he stood, Officer John C. looking like a giant erector set.  I walked up with the bat, prepared to swing and then tripped him so he fell on his back. "Then," I quietly stated, "I'd throw the bat away and pour nitric acid all over head.  As the acid trickled through the cracks in the armor, I'd feel certain he'd pose no further threat."

As usual, I pissed off a few, but for the most part all seemed to enjoy my far out views.

I heard a voiced calling me from behind. I turned and saw Bernie F., a nice jew spy who likes to keep tabs on what the goyim are doing. He does report certain things to the local synagogue according to a Miss Pam. R. who likes me a lot even though I am a stupid goy. Anyway, I didn't give him my Masonic handshake but, in parting, he did give me his Adolf Hitler handshake. I assured him that I had no weapons of mass destruction hidden under my bed and, as promised, I dismantled my portable gas chamber. 

Suppose Saskatchewan (Canada) was an independent state making titanium slingshots which would fire laser bullets all having the power of 666 pounds of TNT. Further, the people there didn't like people from Montana and their emperor Sasquatch thought that maybe the world would be better off without Montana and those who ate grass there. Would Uncle Sam care? Yes, he would.

Suppose Saskatchewan were located in Wilkesland Antarctica. Would USZOG feel the same way? I doubt it.

My theory says that Israel is another chunk of real estate belonging to the American Empire. It is a special territory in the sense that the District of Columbia is, with special rules and so forth. Iraq is a threat to American territory -- Israel, where the dumb jews live. Our Jamaican jew Secretary of State says Iraq is a threat to USZOG proper, where the smart jews live. That's not the case. (You don't see our smart jews volunteering to live in the "surprise bomb"  "promised land" do you?)  The fact that Iraq has a pile of riches only adds fire to the desire to add that country to American occupied territory. To the wishful thinkers who think that if Saddam retired to Siberia, there would be not war, I say that Saddam means little in the scheme which has been in the works for a long time. USZOG does not want peace as we understand it. "Peace", to USZOG means that it controls everything on the planet which can be turned into profit -- and since this is the typical American citizen view of life (the American Dream!) they will mostly go along.

If USZOG were not a massive hypocrite, it would simply lay waste to Iraq and march in, flags waving, caring not if the serfs of the world agreed. But, in order to continue the farce of "we support self determination and national sovereignty" and "this is for your own good" sales talk, USZOG wants that sorry UN gaggle of lip-service payers to nod approval. If they didn't, it would be 'bombs-away' anyway, as stated by the emperor thus demonstrating that the UN is a hot air organization built by USZOG to give the ninnies who finance it a feeling of "belonging", and "self worth", which enhances their subjective image and allows them something to toast to. This is similar in structure to the silly "student government" which is part of our school system. Just try, you little brain-washed suckers, and do something that the school administration does not approve of. You'll soon see that your "student government" is just play acting.

I like my little theory because it fits what's going on. Israel didn't drop unexpectedly on the planet like UFO #666. There was power and money behind it's formation, and continued support, and that spells USZOG. Like the man who refuses to believe demonstrable facts that his wife is a whore, we Americans simply cannot bring ourselves to question what we do, for after all, aren't all of our problems due to someone, or something, else? That's part of the American way.

He cannot see the forest for the trees. Remember?

Here in the fairyland of my own making, I have a little jar containing a dozen atoms. There are 3 each of carbon and oxygen, and 6 of hydrogen. Now the question is, "What molecule did I dissemble to have those exact parts?" I can hear the roar of speculation, hypothesizing and wishful thinking which is a national sport here in our Judeo hog pen. There are 10 possibilities:

Methyoxlethanoic acid, methyl carbonate, glyceraldehyde, 1,2-butanediol, methyl glycolate, hydracrylic acid, 1,3,5-trioxane, dihydroxlyacetone and 2 isomers of lactic acid.

Even if you knew all the answers, you'd have only 1 shot out of 10 of calling the correct one. As the number of atoms increases, so do the number of isomers in most cases. I'll leave you with a question:

Of the nearly 40,000 artificial substances synthesized by man, how many were produced by Africans? Asian? Europeans? Synthesis is like an invention, the end product is intentional as opposed to discoveries which are accidents. The fact that Africans come up with zero indicates the extent of White racism, wouldn't you say? Asians, ho hum -- next to zilch. Pass the rice. All peoples discover things but White people are the world's king when it comes to invention -- they stand alone unchallenged -- and don't let your Marxist teachers talk you out of the truth. -- even though it means good grades.

Milan, Italy -- An older man active with Comunità Politica Di Avanguardia, a right-wing Italian organization, died today after being beaten by members of a radical Jewish Zionist group, and his companion, Vibeke Ostergaard, an Icelandic native who had written articles for publications such as Resistance Magazine and Vanguard News Network, was reported hospitalized and in critical condition.

According to sources close to the investigation, Ostergaard and his companion, who was not named, were attacked by members of an extremist group similar to the American Jewish Defense League. The group is believed to have targeted the two because of their political beliefs, and has ties to extremist racist Jewish political parties in Israel.

Such acts of terror against whites have become more common, as the Jews have perfected their brutality in terror against Palestinians and Arabs. Jews have conned many whites into thinking that Jewish brutality against Third World peoples will not spill over into official Jewish terror against other races, including whites themselves.

The attack may be linked to a series of assaults on anti-Semitic activists in Europe by Jewish terrorists, who also recently attacked an elected official of the British Nationalist Party in Yorkshire, England. Internationally, the agents of Jewish terror and Israel have been conducting systematic violence against white nationalist activists, including a reign of terror by the Mossad- linked head of the US Justice Department's Criminal Investigations Division, Michael Chertoff.

Libertarian Socialist News
Post Office Box 12244
Silver Spring, MD 20908

Robertsez -- The American taxpayer basically funded WWII for the Allies. USZOG is the hub of the whole effort to dominate the world and destroy sovereign states. USZOG halted their advance into Germany so the Soviets could capture Berlin. The rape and plundering done by our "gallant Soviet Allies" was with the approval of Washington. Millions of Europeans who surrendered to American troops were shipped back to the Soviet, underneath a blanket of lies, for "processing" (Race-mixed Eisenhower's Operation Keelhaul.). The whole Bolshevik apparatus in Russia would never have existed without the support of USZOG. Israel is not some sort of renegade country. It also could not exist without USZOG support. If Israel vanished overnight, the push for USZOG world domination would continue unabated. Israel is little more than a handy tool for papa ZOG serving as its bully boy, and excuse, in the middle east. Any squabble between Russia, the US and/or Israel is like a dispute between the vice presidents of Satan, Inc. to see who will be next in line for CEO. They are all in this together. Don't let the charlatans tell you it's the other guy. 

What is a human? We see all sorts of critters which resemble us in certain ways but does that make them human? When a horse sees a zebra, does it think it is seeing another horse differing only by skin color? Does the coral snake think it has found a relative when it encounters a king snake? They have the same colored bands. Does the black rat say "bro" when it meets a brown rat?

For what I can gather, a humans are a variety of animal which can (1) screw each other although this is tenuous since "man" has been screwing everything from sheep to llama for centuries, (2) communicate by a complex set of noises, (3) resemble each other physically in a loose manner and (4) are able to shop at WalMart. It appears that "human" is something like "love". You'll know it when to meet it. To those who never think about anything beyond their next beer, "human" is whatever someone else tells you it is -- usually jews do the telling.

The human brain differs in size, convolutions, density, and in other ways, but unlike the brains in the rest of the animal world, it is born blank having no use beyond controlling life support functions, such as heart beat and breathing. Even though the brains are physically different, that affects not its function. The human brain is then the only organ on the face of the planet where its appearance is not related to its function. Amazing, wouldn't you say? This blank slate is then filled with experiences drawn from environmental interaction and the possessor becomes whatever he wants to be. If an Eskimo is brought up in a Nigerian village, then he becomes a Black man by programming. None of the Eskimo's other parts appear to be changed, however.

Any farm boy soon discovers that some horses are more clever than others relative to unlatching gates and so on. But that is a horse brain. They are different than the human brain. Each and every human brain is identical in capacity whether Australian aboriginal or highland Scot. When Ming Chu is brought up in a Swedish home, he not only learns to speak in Swedish but he also thinks as does a Swede. If Ming moves to the US and marries Betty Boop, he becomes American in language and in his manner of thinking. As a child in his Swedish home, Ming couldn't tell a banana from a roach. That was due to the cold climate which prevented freedom of thought. No one explained how the cold weather did not prevent his adoption parents from thinking. Well, Ming being a non White automatically received a full scholarship to Farmington University of Central Kentucky under the Persecuted Minorities Act of 2004. Although Ming never looked White, he nonetheless had a White brain because a brain can be anything it wants to be -- according to ZOG. And in the full spirit of freedom, you'd better believe it or face severe consequences.

This separation of the human brain from anything hereditary is only another facet of our separation from individual responsibility. Our failures are never our fault. They are due to someone else or something else. A believer in "God's will" would certainly not be one who files a law suit, wouldn't you think? On the other hand, all successes appear to belong exclusively to us. "I made it happen!" If fruition was absent, then I was not responsible.

This environmentalist approach has led to a gigantic industry selling videos and other schemes of self-improvement where prayer had obviously failed. There are even magic potions designed to "increase brain power". I suppose this appeals to people who simply cannot come to grips with the fact Nature dealt them a losing hand. Instead of playing life's game the best as possible with a pair of deuces, we blame those who were better favored and search for some fountain of youth. What's lost can never be regained nor are substitutes possible. The plastic surgery business runs full blast due to millions unhappy with themselves and a land jammed with unhappy critters is only to glad to lay waste to another people, and their land.

This was clipped from The Observer --

"Space agency officials discovered in late 1999 that many employees didn't have the necessary skills to properly manage     avionics, mechanical engineering and computer systems, according to the GAO report."

FAEM does not need a volume of idle twaddle to tell you that water is wet. The country will turn to crap in direct proportion to the number of muds on the payroll. 

Rogue state = a geographical location of a bunch of people who oppose a ZOG world.
Terrorist = a bunch of people who oppose a ZOG world, but cannot be found.

As an aside, I found it quite interesting that she named the canary Tom. That was the name of her latest husband who managed to "fly the coop".

One must realize that outside of being a indispensable source of non Marxist views, the Internet cannot ever be the medium for any organization building. We can communicate but so what? Learning things contradictory to ZOG programming is a good thing, that is, if you have a mind somewhat larger than that of a sheep. O yes Matilda, the country is full of "ZOG knows best" mutton heads.

Organizations of any sort, to have backbone, must be built upon trust. A flock of vultures intent upon devouring the same carcass cannot be called an organization.

Trust is not something we gain by a pledge or a signature upon some paper. It is the result of basic interaction -- does behavior fit? If Pete says he'll give me $10 per week, and starts by giving me $10, could I expect to receive another such donation next week? The events are not related even though the measure of the gift is the same. It's like a flip of a coin where one toss has nothing to do with the next. If I do not receive that next $10, then trust has taken a shot to the head. If all subsequent weeks saw the arrival of $10, then the missing "payment" could be considered an anomaly.

We could assume that not everyone is perfect, except for some of our blightwing leaders of course, and so trust then depends upon the probability that someone will do as he says. If, for example, a fellow comes through only 3 times out of 20, I'd have no hesitation in labeling him unreliable. That in itself means little unless we wish to depend upon him. If you are attempting some organization then you certainly should expect dependability. Can you expect the internet to provide this relative to forming an organization? I say not.

I care not about a person's wealth, intelligence or ability to attract free lance beaver. If he cannot be trusted, then I don't need his company, advice, or assistance in any manner, no matter how brilliant and polite he might appear. I'd far prefer the long company of 3 Black people whom are trustworthy, than the finest White specimen who talks out of both sides of his mouth. Far better a homely trustworthy woman in your house than a pretty "hot sack" untrustworthy broad. There must be a million older men out there who can attest to this -- through bitter experience.

Now, I, as head of the Bohunk Urban Reclamation Party, BURP for short, can sit here telling my internet organization that task #1 is to blow up the nearest out house. My followers then report back on the brown details and I praise them. Their next project is to impale 7 green frogs on a shish kebob skewer and I give them detailed instructions. They praise me for being so smart and I tell them things are progressing nicely. They are doing something, but one thing no one in the group is doing is checking upon who their "comrades" and "leader" really are. Where do they live? Do they have a family? Where to they work? Is the leader asking his followers to do something he doesn't do? And so on. Note again the position of me, the leader. It's YOU who are exposing your ass while I offer nothing but direction all in the safe environment of a keyboard at the public library. I could be Won Hung Lo, a fellow who runs a pool hall in Crotcha Alabama, or Edna Spreadass, the AIDS infected football team mascot.

You need to know nothing about Edgar Allen Poe in order to benefit from his novels. You need to know nothing about Ted Burlingame in order to benefit from his instructional advice relative to the operation of a jigsaw. This sort of thing is only a student/teacher relation, and not an organization for the purpose of some other objective.

Know your associates! Do not be flattered by their compliments or expertise. Act as if you life depended upon them. Are they trustworthy? To do otherwise is to invite disappointment -- and sometimes of a very serious nature.

On a similar topic, Internet "chat rooms" are not much more than relief from porno site eyestrain. I am positive that all of the participants, if gathered in the town hall, would have entirely different things to say. A few would not and those people would be people with the courage of their of convictions.