(from Liberty Bell, June 1977)

The word "genocide" was coined by the jew, Raphael Lemkin. He was the author of the first draft of the Genocide Convention. As early as 1933, he went before the League of Nations to appeal for such a treaty. He served as an adviser to justice Robert Jackson, chief United States prosecutor at the Nürnberg War Crimes Trials and was instrumental in having the act of genocide included in the indictment against Nazi leaders. He spent a decade visiting the diplomatic corridors and foreign ministries of the world fighting for international action against genocide.

The 1946 session of the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a resolution making genocide an international crime and recommended a treaty against it be drawn up. The Secretary General of the United Nations instructed the Economic and Social Council to prepare a draft of such a convention. In 1948, an ad hoc committee of seven members was appointed to review the draft treaty, as did the United Nations Legal Committee. The completed treaty was presented to the General Assembly in December 1948, where it received unanimous approval. The jew, Ernest Gross, signed on behalf of the United States. Seventy nations have now formally ratified the convention, which came into force after twenty nations had ratified it.

Since the President of the United States has the power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, President Harry Solomon Truman transmitted the Genocide Convention to the Senate in June 1949. At public hearings of a special Genocide Subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, representatives of the American Bar Association went on record as strongly opposing this document. To date, no action has been taken by the United States Senate; but, unlike legislation which automatically dies at the end of each session of Congress if not acted upon, a treaty never dies. It must be ratified or rejected. There is at this time strong pressure for the ratification of the Genocide Convention which has been requested by each successive administration since 1949.

It is imperative that White Americans become informed concerning the text of this Treaty. In other countries, even after the ratification of a treaty, each country may decide when and to what extent it is ready to implement the treaty by passage of national legislation. In the United States, the provisions of a treaty become "the supreme law of the land", as is specifically stated in Article VI of the United States Constitution:

Sect. 2. This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The following salient passages are quoted from the actual text of The Genocide Convention or Treaty:

Article II. In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group such as:

     (a) Killing members of the group;
     (b) causing serious bodily injury or mental harm to members of the group;
     (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
     (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
     (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III. The following acts shall be punishable:

     (a) Genocide;
     (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
     (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
     (d) Attempt to commit genocide;
     (e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV. Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

Article VI. Persons charged with genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article III shall be tried by a competent tribunal of the State in the territory of which the act was committed, or by such international penal tribunal as may have jurisdiction with respect to those Contracting Parties which shall have accepted its jurisdiction.

Although at the present time there is no International Criminal Court, the United Nations as early as 1952 prepared a Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court. It has also been suggested that the present International Court of justice be empowered to try such cases. At present, one American serves on the International Court of justice, but there is no provision that an American always shall be included among the fifteen judges. The Statute of the International Court of Justice, Article 36, Section 1, states: "The jurisdiction of the Court comprises all cases which the parties refer to it and all matters specially provided for in the Charter of the United Nations or in treaties and conventions in force." In other words, United States courts would have no jurisdiction whatsoever concerning charges brought up under the above treaties.

Mental harm (Article II, b) is one of the most dangerous provisions of this Genocide Convention. For example, refusing to employ a person or dismissing him from employment or refusing to take a person in for membership in any organization (public or private), would be punishable under the provisions of mental harm.

The Genocide Convention has been called a fraudulent document by some eminent United States lawyers who claim it actually appeases the totalitarian governments by making it possible for them to continue persecutions as they are doing today, behind the Iron Curtain, without the possibility of bringing legal or moral charges against them for violating the Convention, even if they had ratified it. This is because persecution of political groups is excluded from the definition of genocide.

The Convention does, however, offer a threat to a free people, since it does not define what constitutes "causing serious mental harm to a group," for which crime, White Americans would be exposed to possible arrest, extradition and trial before an "international penal tribunal" without benefit of rights supposedly secured by the Constitution. Ratification of this treaty by the U.S. Senate would:

     (1) Make every U.S. citizen subject to a foreign court, a foreign prosecutor and foreign judges;
     (2) Obligate the United States to intervene in the domestic affairs of every other nation;
     (3) Recognize the right of every foreign nation to intervene in the relations of American citizens with one another;
     (4) Make it an international crime, subject to international action, for any American citizen to do or say anything that an international court might interpret as incitement to cause mental injury to anyone else on account of his race, nationality or religion.

The agenda of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee includes the Genocide Convention. It could be brought up at any time, voted out of Committee favorably by a liberal majority, brought up on the Floor of the Senate at a propitious moment (say, in late December, like the Income Tax and Federal Reserve Acts), ratified by two-thirds of the Senators present and voting -- become the law of the land, There are no provisions as to the number of Senators required for ratification of a treaty. Two or three Senators present and voting could have this power.

A dreary picture, indeed! However the Genocide Treaty could well become a two-edged sword which may be turned against our Zionist oppressors. Should a White Government take power in America the jews could be tried, almost to man, for their support an participation in the movements behind Zionism (officially deemed to be racism by the U.N.), genocide by race-mixing and genocide by abortion. Zero Population Growth is, as advocated by the self-chosen people of satan, a genocide program aimed at White Americans.

Once again, the jews have revealed themselves as true children of their father, satan, the father of lies. They claim always to be persecuted, yet, are most often the persecutors. They legislate against genocide, yet, have always been the chief practitioners of the crime. As an old sage noted "Those who point one finger at another person point three back at themselves." The jews do protest their innocence far too much and even the most gullible among the Gentiles are beginning to wonder. It is not one, but three fingers which indicate the real guilty ones.