The History of Jewish Human Sacrifice
At the dawn of civilization, the blood rite, in which human blood is drunk from
the body of a still-living victim, was known to many tribes. However, only one
people, that has never progressed beyond the Stone
Age, has continued to practice the blood rite and ritual murder. This people
are known to the world as Jews. Arnold Toynbee, a noted scholar, has called the
Jews "a fossil people."
In so doing, he must have been aware of the fact that they still practice
ritual murder and the drinking of human blood (especially Christian blood). As
a scholar, he could not have failed to note the many attested incidents of this
practice of the Jews, for hundreds of example of ritual murder by the Jews are
cited in official Catholic books, in every European literature, and in the
court records of all the European nations.
It is the official historian of the Jews, (Josef Kastein, in his History of the
Jews, who gives the underlying reason for this barbaric custom. On page 173, he
says, "According to the primeval Jewish view, the blood was the seat of
the soul."
Thus it was not the heart which was the seat of the soul, according to the
stone-age Jews, but the blood itself. They believed that by drinking the blood
of a Christian victim who was perfect in every way, they could overcome their
physical short comings and become as powerful as the intelligent civilized
beings among whom they had formed their parasitic
communities. Because of this belief, the Jews are known to have practiced
drinking blood since they made their first appearance in history.
Jewish Murder Plan Against
White Christians Exposed
The Murderous People: The Jews are under a terrible suspicion the world over,
and for good reason. Anyone who does not know this,
does not understand the Jewish problem. Anyone who merely see
the Jews as "a tribe which secures its existence with exchange and old
trousers, and whose uniforms are the long noses," is being misled. But
anyone who knows the monstrous accusation which has been raised against the jews since the beginning of time, will view these people in
a different light. He will begin to see not only a peculiar, strangely
fascinating nation; but criminals, murderers, and devils in human form. He will
be filled with holy anger and hatred against these people of Satan. (John 8:44)
The suspicion under which the Jews are held is murder. They are charged with
enticing White Christian Children (and sometimes blacks to keep them under
control - and if necessary they will run black children down in the streets
with automobiles to show the blacks their power, and that the blacks had better
mind their manners or the same will happen again and again. We all witnessed
this a few years ago in
Ritual Murder
The knowledge of Jewish ritual murder is thousands of years old. It is as old
as the Jews themselves. Non-Jews have passed the knowledge of it from
generation to generation, and it has been passed down to us thorough writings.
It is known of throughout the nation. Knowledge of ritual murder can be found
in even the most secluded rural villages. The grand-father told his grand
children, who passed it on to his children, and his children's children, until
we have inherited the knowledge today from them.
It is also befalling other nations. The accusation is loudly raised
immediately, anywhere int he world, where a body is found which bears the marks
of ritual murder. This accusation is raised only against the Jews. Hundreds and
hundreds of nations, tribes, and races live on this earth, but no one ever
thought to accuse them of the planned murdering of children, or to call them
murderers. All nations have hurled this accusation only against the Jews.
And many great men have raised such an accusation. Martin Luther wrote in his
book "Of The Jews And Their Lies:"
"They stabbed and pierced the body of the young boy Simon of Trent. They
have also murdered other children...The sun never did shine on a more
bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they who imagine to be the people of God,
and who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. Jesus
Christ, the Almighty Preacher from
"He (Martin Luther) accused them (the Jews) of all those fictitious crimes
which had made
The Struggle of Der Sturmer: The only newspaper in
Its workers, most of all its editor Julius Streicher,
were dragged into court hundreds of times. They were convicted, punished and
locked into prison. Der Sturmer came to know the Jew from the confession which
Dr. Conrad Alberti-Sittenfeld, a Jew, wrote in 1899 in No. 12 of the magazine
Gesellschaft:
"One of the most dangerous Jewish qualities is the brutal, direct barbaric
intolerance. A worse tyranny cannot be practiced than that which the Jewish
clique practices. If you try to move against this Jewish clique, they will,
without hesitating, use brutal methods to overcome you. Mainly the Jew tries to
destroy his enemy in the mental area, by which he takes his material gain away,
and undermines his civil existence. The vilest of all forms of retaliation, the
boycott, is characteristically Jewish."
The Der Sturmer was not stopped for several years. Just in
1). Der Sturmer was not fighting against the Jewish religion; but against the
Jewish people.
2). The Talmud and Schulchan aruch are not religious books. They have no right
to be protected under the religious paragraphs.
3). The laws of the Talmud which are quoted and
published in Der Sturmer are exact quotations from the Talmud.
4). The laws of the Talmud are in harsh contradiction
to German morals.
5). The Jews of today are being taught from the Talmud.
With this verdict Der Sturmer brought about the first big breach in the
Jewish/Roman Administration of Justice, which was given the job before the
National Socialist revolution to protect Judaism and its government. The jews, of course, became greatly agitated about this. But for
De Sturmer this success was an omen of the victory yet to come. Of course, Der
Sturmer did not stop half way. It knew what had to be done. It was their duty,
or so they believed. To frustrate the gigantic murder plot of
Judaism against humanity. It was their duty! To brand
this nation before the world, to uncover its crimes and to render it harmless.
It was their duty! To free the world from this national pest
and parasitic race. Der Sturmer would fulfill its mission. It would, for
a time, light up the darkness with the truth which shall eventually rule the
world. And it would always direct itself according to the following proverb:
"He who knows the truth and does not speak it truly is a miserable
creature."
The Laws of The Talmud: If one wishes to learn and understand why the Jews can
commit such insane crimes as ritual murder, they must know the Jewish secrets.
They must know the teachings of the Torah (The Talmud), and the Schulchan
aruch. These laws and teachings are proof that the Jews feel themselves
superior to all nations, that it has declared war on all other races, and that
it is the sworn enemy of the whole of non-Jewish humanity. Even Tactius, the
Roman historian who lived shortly after Christ (55-120) A.D., wrote:
"The Jews are a race that hate the gods and
mankind. Their laws are in opposition to those of all mortals. They despise
what to us is holy. Their laws condone them in committing acts which horrify
us." (Historian V. 3-8)
The Jew knows that when the non-Jewish world knows his laws and sees through
his plans that he is lost. Therefore, by threat of death he forbids their
translation and publication. A well known Jewish scholar (Dibre David) writes:
"If the Gentiles (non-Jews) knew what we are teaching against them, they
would kill us."
The Jewish secret laws are based on the fundamental principle which states:
Only the Jew is human. In contrast all non-Jews are animals,
they are beasts in human form. Anything is permitted against them. The Jew may
lie to, cheat and steal from them. He may rape and murder them. There are
hundreds of passages in the Talmud which the non-jews are described as animals.
Some of them are as follows:
1). "The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans.
They are beasts." (Talmud: Baba Mezia 114b)
2). "The Akum (Negro) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor
the dog more than the Akum." (Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30)
3). "Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in
human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therefore
he will be served by animals in human form." (Midrasch
Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855)
4). "A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal." (Coschen Hamischpat 405)
5). "The souls of non-Jews come from impure spirits and are called
pigs." (Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b)
6). "Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they
compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human." (Schene Luchoth Haberith,
p. 250b)
So that the Jew will never forget that he is dealing with animals, he is
reminded by eating, by death, and eve by sexual intercourse constantly. For The
Talmud teaches:
1). "If you eat with a non-Jew, it is the same as eating with a dog."
(Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b)
2). "If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not
express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell to the Jew: 'God will replace your
loss,' just as if one of his oxen or asses had died." (Jore
Dea 377, 1)
3). "Sexual intercourse between non-Jews is like intercourse
between animals." (Sanhedrin 74b)
It is written in the Talmud about the murder of the non-Jew:
1). "It is permitted to take the body and the life of a non-Jew." (Sepher Ikkarim IIIc, 25)
2). "It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah (Talmud -
Sanhedrin 59b). The Christians
belong to the denying ones of the Torah (Talmud)." (Coschen
Hamischpat 425, Hagah 425, 5)
3). "Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jew), is
doing the same as making a sacrifice to God." (Bammidber Raba, c 21 &
Jalkut 772)
These laws of the Talmud were given to the Jews over 3000 years ago. They are
just as valid today as they were back then. This is how the Jews are taught
from childhood. The results of this stands before us.
It is Jewish Ritual Murder.
The Jews' Bloody History: The Jew is not only the murderer of the Christians in
theory. His history proves that he practices what he preaches. The history of
the Jewish people is an unbroken chain of mass murders and blood-baths. It
started before Christ and has continued with Linen, Trotsky, Sinowjeff, Stalin
and etc., up to today:
1). The extreme to which the Jews will go was shown in Persia where the Jew
Mordecai and the Jewess Esther had 75,800 Persians murdered. They hanged the
Persian King Xerxes' minister Haman along with his ten sons. They celebrated
this bloody victory and to this day still celebrate it during the Feast of
Purim. (Book of Esther 9:6)
After Christ in the years 115-117, on the
The Jews revolted in
"'The Jewish Establishment": 'In the early 1930s, Walter Duranty of
the New York Times was in Moscow, covering Joe Stalin the way Joe Stalin wanted
to be covered. To maintain favor and access, he expressly denied that there was
famine in
In Jewish-Bolshevik Soviet Russia mass murders are even now (1997) are being
carried out. The executioners are mostly Jewish men and women. In inventing new
methods of torture the Jews are past masters. To let Christians die under
torture give them the greatest pleasure. English reporters write that the
Chinese executioners frequently would not carry out their tortures and
executions; they shouldered and could not continue. Therefore, Jews and Jewesses
took their place.
"The Jews were now free to indulge in their most fervent fantasies of mass
murder of helpless victims. Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured
and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded
with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain. Others were
placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry
rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to
the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died
of exhaustion. Others were chained to the floor and left hanging until they
died of exhaustion.
"Others were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into their mouths.
Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while
Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death. Christian
mothers were taken to the public square and their babies snatched from their
arms. A red Jewish terrorist would take the baby, hold it by the feet, head
downward and demand that the Christian mother deny Christ. If she would not, he
would toss the baby into the air, and another member of the mob would rush
forward and catch it on the tip of his bayonet.
"Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out
of their bodies. There were many places of public execution in
The history of the Jews is written in the blood of Christians.
"Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced
the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews,
since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are
the Jews' Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100-million
Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is
not yet." (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon
Ben-Judah, 1869, Henry Ford also noted that: 'It was a Jew
who said, 'Wars are the Jews' harvest'; but no harvest is so rich as civil
wars.' The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem, Vol. III, p. 180)
The history of the Jews is written with Christian blood. Their history proves
that the Jew is extremely cruel and at the same time a
coward. The Jew is not a born soldier; he is a born sadist and murderer. (John
8:44)
The Law of Human Sacrifice: For a long time the newspaper Der Sturmer
endeavored to find the actual law of ritual murder, the law of human sacrifice.
It finally succeeded in doing so. In a trial in which Julius Streicher and Karl
Holz were being tried (because of "offending the Jewish Religious
Society") it was proposed that they call as witness Dr. Erich Bischoff.
Dr. Bischoff appeared.
He was the leading German expert on the laws of the Talmud. He had dedicated
his entire life to the study of the Jewish law books. Dr. Bischoff brought with
him a translation of a secret Jewish law, which clarified with one stroke the
question of ritual murder. It comes from the book of Sohar. This book is
considered to be holy by the Jews.
"You are right! This reproach of yours, which I feel for certain is at the
bottom of your anti-Semitism, is only too well justified; upon this common
ground I am quite willing to shake hands with you and defend you against any
accusation of promoting Race Hatred...We [Jews] have erred, my friend, we have
most grievously erred. And if there is any truth in our error, 3,000, 2,000
maybe 100 years ago, there is nothing now but falseness and madness, a madness
which will produce even greater misery and wider anarchy. I confess it to you
openly and sincerely and with sorrow...We who have posed as the saviors of the
world...We are nothing but the world's seducers, it's destroyers, it's
incinderaries, it's executioners...we who promised to lead you to heaven, have
finally succeeded in leading you to a new hell...There has been no progress,
least of all moral progress...and it is our morality which prohibits all
progress, and what is worse -- it stands in the way of every future and natural
reconstruction in this ruined world of ours...I look at this world, and shudder
at its ghastliness: I shudder all the ore, as I know the spiritual authors of
all this ghastliness..." The eastern Jews especially conform to its laws. In the book of Sohar (a companion of the Talmud). The
English translation related:
"Further there is a Law concerning the slaughter of foreigners, who are
the same as beasts. This slaughter is to be carried out in a lawfully valid
manner. The ones who do not follow the Jewish Religious Law have to be offered
to God as a sacrifice. It is to them that Psalm 44:22 refers:
?Yea, for thy sake are we killed all the day long; we are counted as
sheep for the slaughter." (Thikunne Sohar, edition Berdiwetsch 88b)
Dr. Erich Bischoff declared himself ready to offer an
opinion on this expressed law of ritual murder. However he was rejected. He was
not admitted by the court for "fear of bias."
The Catholic priest Dr. Gottsberger took his place. The defendants handed him
the above mentioned law in Hebrew and German. Dr. Gottsberger was embarrassed
and confused.
After a long consideration he stated that he would not be able to deliver an
opinion on the law of human sacrifice. Due to this Julius Streicher and Karl
Holz were sentenced to several months imprisonment.
Later on, however, Dr. Bischoff (in the trial of 30th October
This translation and publication of the law of human sacrifice is the greatest
blow ever struck the Jews in this controversy. This Law commands the Jews to
Butcher Christians and non-Jews. This is to be done in a "
Jewish Confessions: A further and irrefutable proof of the
existence of Jewish Ritual Murder are the numerous Jewish confessions.
They come from trials, voluntary statements and from confessions by former
rabbis. The confessions were made in two court cases. One of them took place in
Trent in 1475, and the other one in
The voluntary statement was made by the young Jewess Ben Noud who made it to
the French Count Durfort-Civrac. The confessions were made by the following
rabbis who truly converted to Christianity: Drach and Goschler, Fra Sifto of
On page 19 of this work the Jew Teofito confesses how he was initiated into the
knowledge of Ritual Murder. And how the Jews for thousands of years have
concealed it from the Christian and non-Jewish world. Teofito writes:
"This secret of the blood is not know to all the Jews, but only to the
Chakam (doctors) or the rabbis and the scholars, who therefore carry the title ?Conservatori del mistero
"And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hope of their hearts is
directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us Christians
as they dealt with the heathen in
"Thereafter followed the curses and threats of punishment if I should ever
reveal this secret to anyone, neither my mother nor my sister nor brothers or
future wife; but only to one of my future sons who was the most
wise, eager, and most suitable. In this way the secret shall be
inherited from father to son until the farthest descendant."
This is a part of the monk and former Chief Rabbi Teofito's confession. From
other confessions and admissions there is a remarkable agreement on the following
points:
1). The laws demand the Jews to butcher non-Jews from time to time. (The Laws
of The Talmud and the Law of Human Sacrifice)
2). The sacrifice shall take place chiefly:
a. At the Purim Festival
b. At the Passover Festival
It is demanded of the Jews to butcher an adult
Christian if possible, or a black non-Jew for the Purim and to butcher a child
for the Passover. The child must not be over seven years old and must die in
agony.
3). The blood of the victims must be violently
drained. It is to be used at Passover in wine and in the Massen (bread). What
this means is that a small part of the blood is mixed into the dough and the
wine. The procedure is to be performed by the Jewish father.
4). The procedure takes place in the following manner: The father pours a few
drops of fresh or dried and powdered blood into a glass, dips a finger of his
left hand into it and sprinkles (blesses) everything which is on the table,
saying: "Dam Issardia chynim heroff Jsyn prech harbe hossen mashus pohorus."
(Erod,
5). The ritual blood is also used other ways:
a. The young married couple is given a hard boiled egg wich is seasoned with
dried blood which as been pulverized.
b. It is also given to pregnant women in the same way in order to ease their
child birth.
c. It is mixed with egg-white, put on a linen cloth and placed on the chest of
dead Jews so that they will enter heaven without atonement.
d. At circumcision powdered blood will be sprinkled on the wound so it will
heal quickly.
e. Dip fruits or vegetables into it and then eat them, (Schuldran arch Orach
cajjim 158,4) or
f. A dying or decrepit Jew can be saved with it. (Jore Deah 155,3)
The Jews have a superstition which originates from the Orient. They believe
that old people can become younger by drinking the blood of young children.
6). The remainder of the blood is preserved with the greatest of care by the
local rabbis and sold in small bottles by appointed wandering Jews at
neighboring synagogues. This same rabbi certifies that the blood is genuine
pure Christian blood.
7). The Ritual Murder and the Blood Mystery are acknowledge by all Talmudic
Jews, and practiced whenever possible. The Jew believes that he will be
"atoned" by it.
The Hurons, the Canadians and the Iroquois were philosophers of humanitarianism
in comparison to the jews. These are seven Jewish
customs and regulations were established not only in the trials from
Civilized people find this practice so abhorrent that they cannot believe it,
despite the hundreds of pages of evidence against the Jews which are found in
court records. Historical records for five thousand years have provided
irrefutable proof of the blood guilt of the Jews.
As other people became more civilized, the blood rite became a symbolic one,
and a symbolic form of blood, usually wine, was drunk during the ritual, while
the barbaric practice of killing a victim was given up altogether. Only one
group, the Jewish cult, has continued to practice the blood rite in modern
times.
Authorities on the blood rite, such as the noted Catholic scholar, James E.
Bulger, state that the Jews practice the blood drinking rite because they are a
parasitic people who must partake of the blood of the gentile host if they are
to continue to survive. Bulger also states that the drinking of blood is a rite
of black magic which enables the Jewish rabbis to predict the future as the
blood of their non-Jewish victim courses through their veins.
Therefore, Jewish leaders from time to time entice a non-Jewish child,
preferably male, and from six to eight years old. According to Jewish ritual,
the non-Jewish (preferably a Christian child) child must be perfectly formed,
intelligent, and without blemish. He also must be younger than the age of
puberty, because the Jews believe that the blood becomes impure after the
beginning of puberty.
When the (Christian) child is enticed into the synagogue, or, if the Jews are
under observation, into some more secret gathering place, the kidnaped child is
tied down onto a table, stripped, and its body pierced with sharp ritual knives
in the identical places where the nails entered the body of Christ on the
stake. As the blood is drained into cups, the Jewish leaders raise the cups and
drink from them, while the child slowly expires in an atmosphere of unrelieved
horror.
The Jews call down curses upon Christ and on all the non-Jewish people, and
celebrate their symbolic victory over them as they continue to drink the blood
of the dying child. Only by performing this rite, so the Jews believe, can they
continue to survive and prosper among their non-Jewish host.
The ancient Khazar Jews along with others of that Near East era followed a
common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to burn a young person upon
an altar called a Tophet. The Old Testament of the Bible mentions this practice
and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums would be beaten loudly to drown
out the cries of the children being burned alive.
In the days of Ancient Israel the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to drown
out their screams.
The Carthaginians also were worshipers of Baal and sacrificed children on a
massive scale. When faced with defeat in
Even though God commanded circumcision, there is no way a reading of Scripture
shows that God intended that the procedure turn into a bloody ritual. Besides
that, it seems apparent that when Christ nailed the blood ordinances to the
cross, he also nailed the circumcision to the cross. "Behold, I Paul say
unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing."
(Galatians 5:2)
"The mode of government which is the most propitious
for the full development of the class war, is the
demagogic regime which is equally favorable to the two fold intrigues of
Finance and Revolution. When this struggle is let loose in a violent form, the
leaders of the masses are kings, but money is god: the demagogues are the
masters of the passions of the mob, but the financiers are the master of the
demagogues, and it is in the last resort the widely spread riches of the
country, rural property, real estate, which, for as long as they last, must pay
for the movement.
When the demagogues prosper amongst the ruins of social and political order,
and overthrown traditions, gold is the only power which counts, it is the
measure of everything; it can do everything and reigns without hindrance in
opposition to all countries, to the detriment of the city of the nation, or of
the empire which are finally ruined.
In doing this do not financiers work against themselves?
It may be asked: in destroying the established order do not they destroy the
source of all riches? This is perhaps true in the end; but whilst states which
count their years by human generations, are obliged in order to insure their
existence to conceive and conduct a far-sighted policy in view of a distant
future, Finance which gets its living from what is present and tangible, always
follows a short-sighted policy, in view of rapid results and success without
troubling itself about the morrows of history." Make no mistake about it, The god of the Jews is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and
Jacob/Israel. And if it were the same God -- the
manner in which the Jews worship is administered is an abomination in the eyes
of the Lord our God. Many people think this sort of thing may have happened in
the past but did not exist after the Babylonian captivity.
However, from the account of Dio Cassius in the 78th Book of his history,
Chapter 32, written in 117 A.D. comes the following:
"Then the Jews in Cyrene [on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa]
choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and Devoured
[ate] their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins,
and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts
and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000
were killed. In
Following is an expose on Jewish Ritual Murder which is currently being
conducted just as it has for centuries.
Jewish Ritual Murder
On
Jews Protest Sacrifice Tale on Oprah Show
New York Times News Service
"Hundreds of television viewers and the leaders of
several Jewish and civil liberties organizations have protested allegations on
a popular talk show last week that some Jews practice ritual killing of
children. The allegations were made by a guest using the pseudonym Rachel on
'The Oprah Winfrey Show,' a widely viewed syndicated talk show. During the
program, broadcast Monday, Winfrey introduced the guest as someone who was
undergoing long- term psychiatric ("The Jews are more subject to diseases
of the nervous system than the other races and peoples among which they dwell.
Hysteria and neurasthenia appear to be most frequent. Some physicians of large
experience among the Jews have even gone so far as to state that most of them
are neurasthenic and hysterical." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IX,
(1905), p. 225); "Idiocy and imbecility are found comparatively more often
among Jews than among non-Jews...The Mongolian type of idiocy is also very
frequently observed among Jews...Among the Jews the proportion of insane has been
observed to be very large...Jews are more liable to acute psychoses of early
age than are non-Jews." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, (1904), p. 556,
603-04)) treatment for a multiple personality
disorder. The woman told Winfrey that she had witnessed the ritual sacrifice of
children and had been a victim of ritualistic abuse.
"The guest also said of such practices: 'there's other
Jewish families across the country. It's not just my family.' The
assertions were made during a program that focused on the cult murders of at
least 13 people whose bodies were found last month near
"Harpo Productions Inc., denied Winfrey had acted irresponsibly in
broadcasting the interview since she had emphasized on the show that the guest
spoke only for herself. He added that Winfrey and her producers would meet with
representatives of the Jewish and civil liberties groups next week in
"The woman responded: 'Right. When I was very young, I was forced to
participate in that, and which I had to sacrifice an infant.' The guest was
repeatedly identified by Winfrey as being Jewish. At one point, the woman
asserted that {Jewish} ritual sacrifices occurred in other Jewish families
around the country and that they were known to the Police."
Although all Jews are aware of the blood rite and its importance to the Jewish
cult, only the most important Jewish leaders, the rabbis and the wealthiest
members of the Jewish community, are allowed to participate in the
blood-drinking rite.
Kastein states, on page 173, that the ordinary Jews are forbidden to
participate in the rite. One reason for this is the fact that the practice of
ritual murder is fraught with danger for the entire Jewish Community. Most
uprisings against the Jews during the past two thousand years have stemmed from
the discovery of this practice, and the resulting attempts of the non-Jews to
punish the Jews for murdering non-Jewish children.
The principal reason that this crime is so often discovered,
is that the naked, pierced body of the child, once it has been drained of
blood, must be thrown on a trash heap. The Jewish rite forbids burial of the
body, even though this would conceal all evidence of their crime. The Talmud,
the Holy Book of the Jews, defines all non-Jews as beasts, and by Jewish law,
the burial of beasts is forbidden. Therefore, the Jews try to conceal their
crime by throwing the corpse of the murdered child down an abandoned well,
where it may not be discovered, or by hiding it in some manner which will not
constitute burial.
In many cases, the body is discovered, and then the Jews either are attacked by
the non-Jews, or they spend thousands of dollars bribing witnesses and
officials, and attempting to frame some gentile as a "sex murderer."
Bribery and intimidation of public officials and newspapermen is always the
first step in this campaign. In the
Could Jewish Ritual Murder Still Exist?
At one time or another the Jews have been expelled
from every country in
I know well that they deny everything, but it all agrees with the judgment of
Christ, that they are poisonous, bitter, vengeful, spiteful serpents,
assassins, and devil's children, who secretly stab and do injury because they
are not able to do it publicly Purim Murder: The ritual murder at Purim is
committed against adult Christians. Fresh strong men and women are preferred.
The Purim festival is celebrated annually by the jews
in February or March. It is in commemoration of the 75,000 Persians murdered by
the Jews. This massacre occurred under the Persian king Ahasuers (Xerxes). He
had a minister (Haman) who recognized the Jewish danger and wanted to expel the
Jews. The king's Jewish whore Esther persuaded him instead to hang Haman and
his ten sons. After that came the murdering of the 75,000 Persians under the
leadership of the Jew Mordecai. The following day the Jews celebrated with
joyous festivities which are observed as the "Feast of Purim" even
today.
At this festival the Jews usually become completely drunk. This occurs
particularly at meetings of Orthodox Jews. During these orgies plays are staged
in which the murder of Ham is re-created by the Jews. An effigy of
"Haman" is put on the stage and is hanged while the Jews curse and
cast-spells (directed against the "Goyim"). The Talmud commands the
Jews to cry out aloud: "May Haman and the Gentiles (non-Jews) be cursed. May Mordecai and all the Jews be blessed." (Orach Cajjim, 690,16)
In
The Jew Moscho poisoned him so that he would never tell about the Purim Feast.
The case was brought to trial, and the jew Moscho was
sentenced to death. (The documents from this trial concerning the Purim
Festival were kept by the authorities at Kammetz until the Bolshevik
revolution. They were then destroyed by the Jews) The accusation was that
during the Jewish feasts of Purim and/or Passover extremist Hassidic Orthodox
Jewish sects would sacrifice a Christian youth for his blood. It was then dried
and the powder mixed into triangular cakes or bread for eating in order for the
Jews to gain atonement in the eyes of God. It is possible that Purim blood
might sometimes have been held over for the Passover.
We are told by James Frazer in his Golden Bough: If the Jewish festival of
Purim was, as I have attempted to show, directly descended either from the
Sacaea or from some other festival, of which the central feature was the
sacrifice of a man in the character of god, we should expect to find traces of
human sacrifice lingering about it in one or other of these mitigated forms to
which I have just referred.
This expectation is fully borne out by the facts. For from a
early time it has been customary with the Jews at the feast of Purim to burn or
otherwise destroy effigies of Haman. The practice was well known under the
We learn from the decree that the custom gave great offence to the Christians,
who regarded it as a blasphemous parody of the central mystery of their own
religion, little suspecting that it was nothing but a continuation, in a milder
form, of a rite that had probably been celebrated in the East long ages before
the birth of Christ.
Apparently the custom long survived the publication of the edict, for in a form
of abjuration which the Greek church imposed on Jewish converts and which seems
to date from the tenth century, the renegade is made to speak as follows:
"I curse also those who celebrate the festival of the so-called Mordecai
on the first Sabbath (Saturday) of the Christian fast, and who nail Haman
forsooth to the tree, attaching to it the symbol of the cross and burning him
along with it, while they heap all sorts of imprecations and curses on the
Christians." (Fr. Cumont, "Une Formule grecque de renonciation au
judaļsme," Wiener Studien, xxiv. (1902) p. 468.
The "Christian fast" referred to in the formula is no doubt Lent. The
mention of the Jewish Sabbath (the Christian Saturday) raises a difficulty,
which has been pointed out by the editor, Franz Cumont, in a note (p. 470):
"The festival of Purim was celebrated on the 14th of Adar, that is, in
February or March, about the beginning of the Christian Lent; but that festival,
the date of which is fixed in the Jewish calendar, does not always fall on a
Saturday. Either the author made a mistake or the civil authority obliged the
Jews to transfer their rejoicing to a Sabbath" (Saturday)).
A Jewish account of the custom as it was observed in Babylonia and Persia in
the tenth century of our era runs as follows:
"It is customary in Babylonia and Elam for boys to make an effigy
resembling Haman; this they suspend on their roofs, four or five days before
Purim. On Purim day they erect a bonfire, and cast the effigy into its midst,
while the boys stand round about it jesting and singing. And they have a ring
suspended in the midst of the fire, which (ring) they hold and wave from one
side of the fire to the other." (Israel Abrahams, The Book of Delight and
other Papers (
That the ring waved over the fire was an emblem of the sun, and that the
kindling of the Purim fires was originally a ceremony of imitative magic to
ensure a supply of solar light and heat) Again, the Arab historian Albīrūnī,
who wrote in the year 1000 A.D., informs us that at Purim the Jews of his time
rejoiced greatly over the death of Haman, and that they made figures which they
beat and burned, "imitating the burring of Haman."
The Jews are firmly united in spite of their dispersal. They are governed by
unknown elders...Even now every town has it's own
judge, every province its rabbi, and all are subordinate to an unknown leader,
who resides in
During the Middle Ages the Italian Jews celebrated
Purim in a lively fashion which has been compared by their own historians to
that of the Carnival. The children used to range themselves in rows opposite
each other and pelt one another with nuts, while grown-up people rode on
horseback through the streets with pine branches in their hands or blew
trumpets and made merry round a puppet representing Haman, which was set on a
platform or scaffold and then solemnly burnt on a pyre. (M. Büdemann,
Geschichte des Erziehungswesens und der Cultur der abendländischen Juden
(Vienna, 1880-1888), ii. 211 sq. ; I. Abrahams, Jewish
Life in the Middle Ages (London, 1896), pp. 260 sq)
In the eighteenth century the Jews of Frankfort used at Purim to make pyramids
of thin wax candles, which they set on fire; also they fashioned images of
Haman and his wife out of candles and burned them on the reading-desk in the
synagogue. (This is the view of H. Graetz (Geschichte der Juden, iv. Leipsic, 1866, pp. 393 sq) and Dr. M.R. James (Life and
Miracles of St. William of Norwich (Cambridge, 1896), by A. Jessopp and M.R.
James, pp. Lxiii, sq))
Now, when we consider the close correspondence in character as well as in date
between the Jewish Purim and the Christian Carnival, and remember further that
the effigy of Carnival, which is now destroyed at this merry season, had
probably its prototype in a living man who was put to a violent death in the
character of Saturn at the Saturnalia, analogy of itself would suggest that in
former times the Jews, like the Babylonians, from whom they appear to have
derived their Purim, may at one time have burned, hanged, or crucified a real
man in the character of Haman. There are some positive grounds for thinking
that this was so.
The early church historian Socrates informs us that at Inmestar, a town among
themselves, in the course of which they played many foolish pranks. In the year
416 A.D., being heated with wine, they carried these sports further than usual
and began deriding Christians and even Christ himself, and to give the more
zest to their mockery they seized a Christian child, bound him to a cross, and
hung him up. At first they only laughed and jeered at him, but soon, their
passions getting the better of them, they ill-treated the child so that he died
under their hands.
The thing got noised abroad, and resulted in a serious brawl between the Jews
and their Christian neighbors. The authorities then stepped in, and the Jews
had to pay dear for the crime they had perpetrated in sport. (Socrates,
Historia Ecclesiastica, vii. 16; Theophanes, Chronographia, vol. I. P. 129.
Theophanes places the event in the year 408 A.D. From a note in Migne's edition
of Socrates, I learn that in the Alexandrian calendar, which Theophanes used,
the year 408 corresponded to the year which in our reckoning began on
The Christian historian does not mention, and perhaps did not know, the name of
the drunken and jovial festival which ended so tragically; but we can hardly
doubt it was Purim, and that the boy who died on the cross represented Haman.
In mediaeval and modern times many accusations of ritual murders, as they are
called, have been brought against the Jews, and the arguments for and against
the charge have been discussed on both sides with a heat which, however
natural, has tended rather to inflame the passions of the disputants than to
elicit the truth. (For an examination of some of these reported murders, see
M.R. James (Life and Miracles of St. William of
This last circumstance points, if there is any truth
in the accusations, to a connection of the human sacrifice with the Passover,
which falls in this week, rather than with Purim, which falls a month earlier.
Indeed it has often been made a part of the accusation that the blood of the youthful
victims was intended to be used at the Passover.
If all the charges of ritual murder which have been brought against the Jews in
modern times... would suffice to account for an occasional recrudescence of
primitive barbarity among the most degraded part of the Jewish community...Such
customs die hard; it is not the fault of society as a whole if sometimes the
reptile has strength enough left to lift its venomous head and sting.
But between the stage when human sacrifice goes on unabashed in the light of
common day, and the stage when it has been driven out of sight into dark holes
and corners, there intervenes a period during which the custom is slowly
dwindling away under the growing light of knowledge and philanthropy. In this
middle period many subterfuges are resorted to for the sake of preserving the
old ritual in a form which will not offend the new morality.
A common and successful device is to consummate the sacrifice on the person of
a malefactor, whose death at the altar or elsewhere is little likely to excite
pity or indignation, since it partakes of the character of a punishment, and
people recognize that if the miscreant had not been dealt with by the priest,
it would have been needful in the public interest to hand him over to the executioner.
We have seen that in the Rhodian sacrifices to Cronus a condemned criminal was
after a time substituted for an innocent victim; ((Life and Miracles of St.
William of
There are some grounds for thinking that this or something of this sort was
done; but a consideration of them had better be deferred until we have cleared
up some points which still remain obscure in Purim, and in the account which
the Jews give of its origin. In the first place, then, it deserves to be
remarked that the joyous festival of Purim on the fourteenth and fifteenth days
of the month Adar is invariably preceded by a fast, known as the fast of
Esther, on the thirteenth; indeed, some Jews fast for several days before
Purim. (J. Buxtorf, Synagoga Judaica (Bāle, 1661), cap.
Xxix. P. 554; J. Chr. G. Bodenschatz, Kirchliche Verfassung der heutigen Juden
(
In the book of Esther the fast is traditionally explained as a commemoration of
the mourning and lamentation excited among the Jews by the decree of King
Ahasuerus that they should all be massacred on the thirteenth day of the month
Adar; for
"in every province, whithersoever the king's commandment and his decree
came, there was great mourning among the Jews, and fasting, and weeping, and
wailing; and many lay in sackcloth and ashes." And Esther, before she went
into the presence of the king to plead for the lives of her people, "bad
them return answer unto Mordecai, Go, gather together all the Jews that are
present in Shushan, and fast ye for me, and neither eat nor drink three days,
night or day: I also and my maidens will fast in like manner."
Hence fasting and lamentation were ordained as the proper preparation for the
happy feast of Purim which commemorated the great deliverance of the Jews from
the destruction that had threatened them on the thirteenth day of Adar. (Esther
iv. 3 and 16, ix. 31) Now we have seen that, in the opinion of some eminent
modern scholars, the basis of the book of Esther is not history but a
Babylonian myth, which celebrated the triumphs and sufferings of deities rather
than of men.
On this hypothesis, how is the fast that proceeds Purim to be explained? The
best solution appears to be that of Jensen, that the fasting and mourning were
originally for the supposed annual death of a god or hero of the type of Tammuz
or Adonis, whose resurrection on the following day occasioned that outburst of
joy and gladness which is characteristic of Purim. The particular god or hero,
whose death and resurrection thus touched with sorrow and filled with joy the
hearts of his worshipers, may have been, according to Jensen, either the great
hero Gilgamesh, or his comrade and friend Eabani. (So far as I know, Professor
Jensen has not yet published his theory, but he has stated it in letters to
correspondents. See W. Nowack, Lehrbuch der hebräischen Archäologie (Freiburg
I. Baden and Leipsic, 1894), ii. 200; II. Günkel,
Schöpfung und Chaos (Göttingen, 1895), pp. 311 sqq.;
D.G. Wildeboer, in his commentary on Esther, pp. 174 sq. (Kurzer Hand-Commentar
sum Alten Testament, herausgegeben von D. K. Marti, Lieferung 6, Freiburg I.
B., 1898). In the Babylonian calendar the 13th of Adar was so far a fast day
that on it no fish or fowl might be eaten. In one tablet the 13th of Adar is
marked "not good," while the 14th and 15th are marked
"good." Cee C. H. W. Johns, s.v. "Purim," Encyclopedia
biblica, iii, (London, 1902) col. 3980) The doughty deeds and adventures of his
mighty pair are the theme of the longest Babylonian poem that has been as yet
discovered. It is recorded on twelve tablets, and this circumstance has
suggested to some scholars the view that the story may be a solar myth,
descriptive of the sun's annual course through the twelve months or the twelve
signs of the zodiac.
However that may be, the scene of the poem is laid chiefly at the very ancient
Babylonian city of
His comrade Eabani also roused the fury of Ishtar, and was wounded to death.
For twelve days he lingered on a bed of pain, and, when he died, his friend
Gilgamesh mourned and lamented for him, and rested not until he had prevailed
on the god of the dead to suffer the spirit of Eabani to return to the upper
world.
The resurrection of Eabani, recorded on the twelfth tablet,
forms the conclusion of the long poem. (M. Jastrow, The Religion of Babylonia
and Assyria (Boston, U.S.A., 1898), pp. 471 sq., 475 sq., 481-486, 510-512;
L.W. King, Babylonian Religion and Mythology (London, 1899), pp. 146 sqq.; P.
Jensen, Assyrisch-Babylonische Mythen und Epen (Berlin, 1900), pp. 116-273;
R.F. Harper, Assyrian and Babylonian Literature (New York, 1901), pp. 566-582;
Das Gilgamesch-Epos, neu übersetzt von Arthur Ungnad und gemeinverständlich
erklärt von Hugo Gressmann (Göttingen, 1911). Professor Jastrow points out that
though a relation cannot be traced between each of the tablets of the poem and
the corresponding month of the year, such a relation
appears undoubtedly to exist between some of the tablets and the months.
Thus, for example, the sixth tablet describes the affection of Ishtar for
Gilgamesh, and the visit which she paid to Anu, her father in heaven, to
complain of the hero's contemptuous rejectoin of her love. Now the sixth
Babylonian month was called the "Mission of Ishtar," and in it was
held the festival of Tammuz, the hapless lover of the goddess. Again, the story
of the great flood is told in the eleventh tablet, and the eleventh month was
called the "month of rain." See M. Jastrow, The Religion
of Babylonia and Assyria, pp. 484, 510) Jensen's theory is that the death and
resurrection of a mythical being, who combined in himself the features of a
solar god and an ancient king of Erech, were celebrated at the Babylonian
Zakmuk or festival of the New Year, and that the transference of the drama from
Erech, its original seat, to Babylon led naturally to the substitution of
Marduk, the great god of Babylon, for Gilgamesh or Eabani in the part of the
hero. Although Jensen apparently does not identify the Zakmuk with the Sacaea,
a little consideration will shew how well his general theory of Zakmuk fits in
with those features of the Sacaean festival which have emerged in the course of
our enquiry.
At the Sacaean festival, if I am right, a man, who personated a god or hero of
the type of Tammuz or Adonis, enjoyed the favors of a woman, probably a sacred
harlot, who represented the great goddess Ishtar or Astarte; and after he had
thus done his part towards securing, by means of sympathetic magic, the revival
of plant life in spring, he was put to death. We may suppose that the death of
this divine man was mourned over by his worshipers, and especially by women, in
much the same fashion as the women of Jerusalem wept for Tammuz at the gate of
the temple, (Ezekiel viii. 14) and as Syrian damsels mourned the dead Adonis,
while the river ran red with his blood. Such rites appear, in fact, to have
been common all over
At all times the Jews have regarded an oath to the Christians
as not being binding. If this interpretation of the Sacaea is correct,
it is obvious that one important feature of the ceremony is wanting in the
brief notices of the festival that have come down to us.
The death of the man-god at the festival is recorded, but nothing is said of
his resurrection. Yet if he really personated a being of the Adonis or Attis
type, we may feel pretty sure that his dramatic death was followed at a shorter
or longer interval by his dramatic revival, just as at the festivals of Attis
and Adonis the resurrection of the dead god quickly succeeded to his mimic
death. (Adonis, Attis, Osiris, Second Edition, pp. 183 sq., 227)
Here, however, a difficulty presents itself. At the Sacaea the man-god died a
real, not a me mimic death; and in ordinary life the
resurrection even of a man-god is at least not an everyday occurrence. What was
to be done? The man, or rather the god, was undoubtedly dead.
How was he to come to life again? Obviously the best, if not the only way, was
to set another and living man to support the character of the reviving god, and
we may conjecture that this was done. We may suppose that the insignia of
royalty which had adorned the dead man were transferred to his successor, who,
arrayed in them, would be presented to his rejoicing worshipers as their god
come to life again; and by his side would probably be displayed a woman in the
character of his divine consort, the goddess Ishtar or Astarte.
In favor of this hypothesis it may be observed that it at once furnishes a
clear and intelligible explanation of a remarkable feature in the book of
Esther which has not yet, so far as I am aware, been adequately elucidated; I
mean that apparent duplication of the principal characters to which I have
already directed the reader's attention. If I am right, Haman the temporary
king of mortal god who was put to death at the Sacaea; and his rival Mordecai
represents the other temporary king who, on the death of his predecessor, was
invested with his royal insignia, and exhibited to the people as the god come
to life again. Similarly Vashti, the deposed queen in the narrative,
corresponds to the woman who played the part of queen and goddess to the first
mock king, the Haman; and her successful rival, Esther or Ishtar, answers to
the woman who figured as the divine consort of the second mock king, the
Mordecai or Marduk. A trace of the sexual license accorded to the mock king of
the festival seems to be preserved in the statement that King Ahasuerus found
Haman fallen on the bed with Esther and asked, "Will he even force the
queen before me in the house?" (Esther vii. 8)
We have seen that the mock king of the Sacaea did actually possess the right of
using the real king's concubines, and there is much to be said for the view of
Movers that he began his short reign by exercising the right in public.
(Adonis, Attis, Osiris, Second Edition, pp. P. 368) In the parallel ritual of
Adonis the marriage of the goddess with her ill-fated lover was publicly
celebrated the day before his mimic death. (Adonis, Attis, Osiris, Second PT.
VI)
A clear reminiscence of the time when the relation between Esther and Mordecai
was conceived as much more intimate than mere cousin ship appears to be
preserved in some of the Jewish plays acted at Purim, in which Mordecai appears
as the lover of Esther; and this significant indication is confirmed by the
teaching of the rabbis that King Ahasuerus never really knew Esther, but that a
phantom in her likeness lay with him while the real Esther sat on the lap of
Mordecai. (J.J. Schudt, Jüdische Maerkwüdigkeiten (
The Persian setting, in which the author of the book of Esther has framed his
highly-colored picture, naturally suggests that the Jews derived their feast of
Purim not directly from the old Babylonians, but from their Persian conquerors.
Even if this could be demonstrated, it would in no way invalidate the theory
that Purim originated in the Babylonian festival of the Sacaea, since we know
that the Sacaea was celebrated by the Persians. (Dio Chrysostom makes Diogenes
say to Alexander the Great, The festival was mentioned by Ctesias in the second
book of his Persian history (Athenaeus, xiv. 44 p. 639c); and down to the time
of Strabo it was associated with the nominal worship of the Persian goddess
Anaitis (Strabo, xi. 8. 4 and 5, p. 512))
Hence it becomes worth while to enquire whether in the Persian religion we can
detect any traces of a festival akin to the Sacaea or Purim. Here Lagarde has
shown the way by directing attention to the old
Persian ceremony known as the "Ride of the Beardless One." (Lagarde,
"Purim," pp. 51) This was a rite performed both in
A beardless and, if possible, one-eyed buffoon was set naked on an ass, a
horse, or a mule, and conducted in a sort of mock triumph through the streets
of the city. In one hand he held a crow and in the other a fan, with which he
fanned himself, complaining of the heat, while the people pelted him with ice
and snow and drenched him with cold water. He was supposed to drive away the
cold, and to aid him perhaps in discharging this useful function he was fed
with hot food, and hot stuffs were smeared on his body. Riding on his ass and attended
by all the king's household, if the city happened to be the capital, or, if it
was not, by all the retainers of the governor, who were also mounted,
He paraded the streets and extorted contributions. He stopped at the doors of
the rich, and if they did not give him what he asked for, he befouled their
garments with mud or a mixture of red ochre and water, which he carried in an
earthenware pot. If a shopkeeper hesitated a moment to respond to his demands,
the importunate beggar had the right to confiscate all the goods in the shop;
so the tradesmen who saw him bearing down on them, not unnaturally hastened to
anticipate his wants by contributing of the substance before he could board
them.
Everything that he thus collected form break of day to the time of morning
prayers belonged to the king or governor of the city; but everything that he
laid hands on between the first and the second hour of prayer he kept for
himself. After the second prayers he disappeared, and if the people caught him
later in the day they were free to beat him to their heart's content. "In
like manner," proceeds one of the native writers who has described the
custom,
"people at the present time appoint a New Year Lord and make merry. And
this they do because the season, which is the beginning of Azur or March,
coincides with the sun's entry into Aries, for on that day they disport
themselves and rejoice because the winter is over." (Th. Hyde, Historia
religion is veterum Persarum (Oxford, 1700), pp. 183, 249-251; AlbīrūnĻ, The Chronology
of Ancient Nations, translated and edited by Dr. C. Edward Sachau (London,
1879), p. 211)
Now in this harlequin, who rode through the streets attended by all the king's
men, and levying contributions which went either to the royal treasury or to
the pocket of the collector, we recognize the familiar features of the mock or
temporary king, who is invested for a short time with the pomp and privileges
of royalty for reasons which have been already explained. (The Dying God, pp.
148)
The abrupt disappearance of the Persian clown at a certain hour of the day,
coupled with the leave given to the populace to thrash him if they found him
afterwards, points plainly enough to the harder fate that probably awaited him
in former days, when he paid with his life for his brief tenure of a kingly
crown.
The resemblance between his burlesque progress and that of Mordecai through the
streets of Susa is obvious; though the Jewish author of Esther has depicted in
brighter colors the pomp of his hero "in royal apparel of blue and white,
and with a great crown of gold, and with a robe of fine linen and purple,"
riding the king's own charger, and led through the city by one of the king's
most noble princes. (Esther vi. 8. Viii. 15)
The difference between the two scenes is probably not to be explained simply by
the desire of the Jewish writer to shed a halo of glory round the personage
whom he regarded as the deliverer of his people. So long as the temporary king
was a real substitute for the reigning monarch, and had to die sooner or later
in his stead. It was natural that he should be treated with a greater show of
deference, and should simulate his royal brother more closely than a clown who
had nothing worse than a beating to fear when he laid down his office. In short,
after the serious meaning of the custom had been forgotten, and the substitute
was allowed to escape with his life, the high tragedy of the ancient ceremony
would rapidly degenerate into farce. But while the "Ride of the Beardless
One" is, from one point of view, a degenerate copy of the original,
regarded from another point of view, it preserves some features which are
almost certainly primitive, though they do not appear in the kindred Babylonian
and Jewish festivals.
The Persian custom bears the stamp of a popular festivity rather than of a
state ceremonial, and everywhere it seems as if popular festivals, when left to
propagate themselves freely among the folk, reveal their old meaning and
intention more transparently than when they have been adopted into the official
religion and enshrined in a ritual.
The simple thoughts of our simple forefathers are better understood by their
unlettered descendants than by the majority of educated people; their rude
rites are more faithfully preserved and more truly interpreted by a rude
peasantry than by the priest, who wraps up their nakedness in the gorgeous pall
of religious pomp, or by the philosopher, who dissolves their crudities into
the thin air of allegory.
In the present instance the purpose of the "Ride of the Beardless
One" at the beginning of spring is sufficiently obvious; it was meant to
hasten the departure of winter and the approach of summer. We are expressly
told that the clown who went about fanning himself and complaining of the heat,
while the populace snowballed him, was supposed to dispel the cold; and even
without any such assurance we should be justified in inferring as much from his
behavior.
On the principles of homoeopathic or imitative magic, which is little more than
an elaborate system of make-believe, you can make the weather warm by
pretending that it is so; or if you cannot, you may be sure that there is some
person wiser than yourself who can.
Such a wizard, in the estimation of the Persians, was the beardless one-eyed
man who went through the performance I have described; and no doubt his
physical defects were believed to contribute in some occult manner to the
success of the rite. The ceremony was this, as Lagarde acutely perceived, the
oriental equivalent of those popular European customs which celebrate the
advent of spring by representing in a dramatic form the expulsion or defeat of
winter by the victorious summer. (The Dying God, pp. 254)
But whereas in
But why, the reader may ask, should the divine pair be thus duplicated and the
two pairs set in opposition to each other? The answer is suggested by the
popular European celebrations of spring to which I have just adverted. If my
interpretation of these customs is right, the contrast between the summer and
winter, or between the life and death, which figure in effigy or in the persons
of living representatives at the spring ceremonies of our peasantry, is
fundamentally a contrast between the dying or dead vegetation of the old and
the sprouting vegetation of the new year, a contrast which would lose nothing
of its point when, as in ancient Rome and Babylon and Persia, the beginning of
spring was also the beginning of the new year.
In these and in all the ceremonies we have been examining the antagonism is not
between powers of a different order, but between the same power viewed in
different aspects as old and young; it is, in short, nothing but the eternal
and pathetic contrast between youth and age. And as the power or spirit of
vegetation is represented irreligious ritual and popular custom by a human
pair, whether they be called Ishtar and Tammuz, or Venus and Adonis, or the
Queen and King of May, so we may expect to find the old decrepit spirit of the
past year personated by one pair, and the fresh young spirit of the new year by
another. This, if my hypothesis is right, is the ultimate explanation of the
struggle between Haman and Vashti on the one side, and their doubles Mordecai
and Esther on the other.
In the last analysis both Parts stood for the powers that make for the
fertility of plants and perhaps also of animals; (The interpretation here given
of the four principal personages in the book of Esther was suggested by me in
the second edition of this book (1900). It agrees substantially with the one
which has since been adopted yb Professor H. Zimmern (in E. Schrader's Die
Keilinschriften und das Alte Testament, Berlin, 1902, p. 19), and by Professor
P. Haupt (Purim, Leipsic, 1906, pp. 21)) but the one pair embodied the failing
energies of the past, and the other the rigorous and growing energies of the
coming year. Both powers, on my hypothesis, were personified not merely in
myth, but in custom; for year by year a human couple undertook to quicken the
life of nature by a union in which as in a microcosm, the loves of tree and
plant, of herb and flower, of bird and beast were supposed in some mystic
fashion to be summed up. (In this connection it deserves to be noted that among
the anicent Persians marriages are said to have been usually celebrated at the
vernal equinox (Strabo, xv. 3. 17, p. 733))
Originally, we may conjecture, such couples exercised their functions for a
whole year, on the conclusion of which the male partner; the divine king, was
put to death; but in historical times it seems that, as a rule, the human god;
the Saturn, Zoganes, Tammuz, or whatever he was called, enjoyed his divine
privileges, and discharged his divine duties only for a short part of the year.
This curtailment of his reign on the earth was probably introduced at the time
when the old hereditary divinities or defied kings contrived to shift the most
painful part of their duties to a substitute, whether that substitute was a son
or a slave or a malefactor. Having to die as a king, it was necessary that the
substitute should also live as a king for a season; but the real monarch would
naturally restrict within the narrowest limits both of time and of power a
reign which, so long as it lasted, necessarily encroached upon and indeed
superseded his own. (The five days' duration of the mock king's reign may
possibly have been an intercalary period introduced, as in ancient Egypt and
Mexico, of the purpose of equalizing a year of 360 days & twelve months of
30 days each) to a solar year reckoned at 365 days. See above, pp. 339)
What became of the divine king's female partner, the human goddess who shared
his bed and transmitted his beneficent energies to the rest of nature, we
cannot say. So far as I am aware, there is little or no evidence that she like
him suffered death when her primary function was discharged. (However, the
legend that Semiramis burned herself on a pyre in Babylon for grief at the loss
of a favorite horse (Hyginus, Fab. 243; compare Pliny, Nat. Hist. viii. 155) may
perhaps point t o an old custom of compelling the human representative of the
goddess to perish in the flames.
We have seen above that one of the lovers of Ishtar had the form of a horse.
Hence the legend recorded by Hyginus is a fresh link in the chain of evidence
which binds Semiramis to Ishtar) The nature of maternity suggests an obvious
reason for sparing her a little longer, till that mysterious law, which links
together woman's life with the changing aspects of the nightly sky, had been
fulfilled by the birth of an infant god, who should in his turn, reared perhaps
by her tender care, grew up to live and die for the world.
We may now sum up the general results of the enquiry which we have pursued in
the present chapter. We have found evidence that festivals of the type of the
Saturnalia, of a man in the character of a god, were at one time held all over
the ancient world from
When the Jews have been wandering around for a whole week, soon they cheat a
Christian here and there, they commonly gather together on their Sabbath day
and boast of their knavish tricks among themselves, whereupon the other Jews
declare...they shall take the heart from out of the body of a Christian, and
say furthermore...the best of the Christians should be beaten to death.
Originally his term of office appears to have been limited to a year, on the
conclusion of which he was put to death; but in time he contrived by force or
craft to extend his reign and sometimes to procure a substitute, who after a
shortand more or less nominal tenure of the crown was slain in his stead. At
first the substitute for the divine father was probably the divine son, but
afterwards this rule was no longer insisted on, and still later the growth of a
human feeling demanded that the victim should always be a condemned criminal.
In this advanced stage of degernation it is no wonder if th
elight of divinity suffered eclipse, and many should fail to detect the god in
the malefactor. Yet the downward career of fallen deity does not stop here;
even a criminal comes to be thought too good to personate a god on the gallows
or in the fire; and then there is nothing left but to make up a
more or less grotesque effigy, and so to hang, burn, or otherwise destroy the god
in the person of this sorry representative.
By this time the original meaning of the ceremony may be so completely
forgotten that the puppet is supposed to represent some historical personage,
who earned the hatred and contempt of his fellows in his life, and whose memory
has ever since been held up to eternal execration by the annual destruction of
his effigy. The figures of Haman, of the Carnival, and of Winter or Death which
are or used to be annually destroyed in spring by Jews, Catholics, and the
peasants of Central Europe respectively, appear to be all lineal descendants of
those human incarnations of the powers of nature whose life and death were
deemed essential to the welfare of mankind. But of the three the only one which
has preserved a clear trace of its original meaning is the effigy of Winter or Death.
In others the ancient significance of the custom as a magical ceremony designed
to direct the course of nature has been almost wholly obscured by a thick after
growth of legend and myth. The cause of this distinction is that, whereas the
practice of destroying an effigy of Winter or Death has been handed down from
time immoral through generations of simple peasants, the festivals of Purim and
the Carnival, as well as their Babylonian and Italian prototypes,
the Sacaea and the Saturnalia, were for centuries domesticated in cities, where
they were necessarily exposed to those thousand transforming and disintegrating
currents of speculation and enquiry, of priestcraft and policy, which roll
their turbid waters through the busy haunts of men, but leave undefiled the
limpid springs of mythic fancy in the country.
If there is any truth in the analysis of the Saturnaila and kindred festivals
which I have now brought to a close, it seems to point to a remarkable
homogeneity of civilization throughout
All these things appear to hang together; all of them may, perhaps, be regarded
as the shattered remnants of a uniform zone of religion and society which at a
remote era belted the
It is possible that such sacrifices of deified men, performed for the salvation
of the world, may have helped to beget the notion that the universe or some
part of it was originally created out of the bodies of gods offered up in
sacrifice. Certainly it is curious that notions of this sort meet us precisely
in parts of the world where such sacrifices appear to have been regularly
accomplished. Thus in ancient Mexico, where the sacrifice of human beings in
the character of gods formed a conspicuous feature of the national religion, it
is said that in the beginning, when as yet the light of day was not, the gods
created the sun to illumine the earth by voluntarily burning themselves in the
fire, leaping one after the other into the flames of a great furnace. (B. De
Sahagun, Histoire Gčnčrale des Choses de la Nouvelle Espagne, traduite par D.
Jourdanet et R. Simeon (Parts, 1880), pp. 478-480. Compare E. Seler,
Altmexikanische Studien, ii. (
Again, in the Babylonian Genesis the great god Bel crated the world by cleaving
the female monster Tiamat in twain and using the severed halves of her body to
form the heaven and the earth. Afterwards, perceiving that the earth was waste
and void, he obligingly ordered one of the gods to cut off his, the Creator's,
head, and with the flowing blood mixed with clay he kneaded a paste out of
which he molded men and animals. (Berosus, quoted by Eusebius, Chronicorum
liber prior, ed. A. Schoene (Berlin, 1875), coll. 14-18; id., in Fragmenta
Historicorum Graecorum, ed. C. Muller, ii. 497 sq; P. Jensen,
Assyrisch-Babylonische Mythen und Epen (Berlin, 1900), pp. 2; L. W. King,
Babylonian Religion and Mythology (London, 1899), pp. 54; M. Jastrow, The
Religion of Babylonia and Assyria (Boston, U.S.A., 1898), pp. 408; H. Zimmern,
in E. Schrader's Die Keilinschriften und das alte Testament (Berlin, 1902), p.
488; M.J. Lagrange, Etudes sur les Religions Sčmitiques (Parts, 1905), p. 366;
R. W. Rogers, Cuneiform Parallels to the Old Testament (Oxford, preface dated
1911), p. 31, 36. In the Hebrew account of the creation (Genesis 1:2) "the
deep" is a reminiscence of the Babylonian mythical monster Tiamt)
Similarly in a hymn of the Rig Veda we read how the gods created the world out
of the dismembered body of the great primordial giant Purushu. The sky was made
out of his head, the earth out of his feet, the sun out of his eye, and the
moon out of his mind; animals and men were also engendered from his dripping
fat or his limbs, and the great gods Indra and Agni sprang from his mouth.
(Hymns of the Rig Ved, x. 90 (vol. Iv. Pp. 289-293 of R.T.H. Griffith's translation,
The crude, nay savage, account of creation thus set forth by the poet was
retained by the Brahman doctors of a later age and refined by them into a
subtle theory of sacrifice in general. According to them the world was not only
created in the beginning by the sacrifice of the creator Prajapati, the Lord of
Creatures; to this day it is renewed and preserved solely by a repetition of
that mystic sacrifice in the daily sacrificial ritual celebrated by the
Brahmans. Every day the body of the Creator and Savior is broken anew, and
every day it is pieced together for the restoration and conservation of a
universe which otherwise must dissolve and be shattered into fragments. Thus is
the world continually created afresh by the self-sacrifice of the deity; and,
wonderful to relate, the priest who offers the sacrifice identifies himself
with the Creator, and so by the very act of sacrificing renews the universe and
keeps up uninterrupted the revolution of time and matter.
All things depend on his beneficent, nay divine activity, from the heaven above
to the earth beneath, from the greatest god to the meanest worm, from the sun
and moon to the humblest blade of grass and the minutest particle of dust.
Happily this grandiose theory of sacrifice as a process essential to the
salvation of the world does not oblige the priest to imitate his glorious
prototype by dismembering his own body and shedding his blood on the altar; on
the contrary a comfortable corollary deduced form it holds out to him the
pleasing prospect of living for the unspeakable benefit of society to a good
old age, indeed of stretching out the brief span of human existence to a full
hundred years. (The Satapatha Brāhmana, translated by Julius Eggeling, Part iv. (
Jewish Human Sacrifice
The ancient Khazar Jews along with other of that
Near East era followed a common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to
burn a young person upon an altar called a Tophet. The Old Testament of the
Bible mentions this practice and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums
would be beaten loudly to drown out the cries of the children being burned
alive. In the days of Ancient Israel the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to
drown out their screams. The Carthaginians also were worshipers of Baal and
sacrificed children on a massive scale. When faced with defeat in
In Excavations at
Photographs of the children's bodies are published in Macalister's book,
although the book itself, like most works which attest to the criminal nature
of the Jews, is now almost unobtainable. It is classified as a rare book, and
most rare book dealers are Jews.
In the Bible, Isaiah 57:3-5 the prophet, talking of the Jews of his day says:
"But draw near hither, ye sons of the sorceress, the seed of the adulterer
and the whore. Against whom do ye sport yourselves? against
whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue? are
ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood, Enflaming yourselves
with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under
the clefts of the rocks?"
By the phrase, "ye sons of the sorceress," Isaiah calls attention to
the fact that Jewish ritual murder is a black magic rite. It is customary for
the rabbi, as he drinks blood, to invoke the presence of Satan, who will then
presumably carry out the wishes of the Jews. The drinkers of blood also swear
eternal obedience to Satan during the blood rite.
Isaiah also calls attention to the fact that here the children are slain
"under the cleft of the rocks." This refers to the Jewish ban against
burying the slain gentile child, and to hiding the body in the rocks in the
hopes that the gentiles will not discover their crime.
The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VIII, page 653, published in 1904, says,
"The fact, therefore, now generally accepted by critical scholars, is that
in the last days of the kingdom, human sacrifices were offered to Yhwh (Yahu,
or Jehovah), as King of Counsellor of the Nation, and that the Prophets
disapproved of it."
Yahu also is interchangeable with Baal, the Golden Idol, and Satan, who is
thought to have been a minor god of the Jews, and an instrument of Baal. The
two themes of Jewish history are blood and gold, and every practice of the Jews
is inextricably bound up with these two factors.
Let me briefly quote Dr. Vladimir Ivanovich Dal from the above-cited book on
these crimes:
"It was not just one group of people who have accused Jews of committing
such deplorable acts; Jews were accused many times of that in court by a
variety of people. On the whole, there was not only their own confession in
addition to other evidence; but there were such examples where the Jews were
exposed and, consequently, had recognized themselves as being true. One such
event should obviously be enough for people to acknowledge the real existence
of such villainous human mutilation, but the defenders of Jews say something
quite different: The confession was forced by torture and, therefore, proves
nothing. Assuming, however, this argument is true, too, and believing all that
was ever said and written on this problem in favor of Jews, with respect to
forced confessions, there is still one circumstance that will remain, which is
never paid enough attention.
This circumstance not only remains as unexplained by Jews but also is the proof
of the crime itself--namely, it is not doubtful that, from time to time, the
corpses of babies, who were missing, were eventually discovered in such
distorted conditions and with such signs of external violence that they
attested to images of excruciatingly painful deaths. This is the
kind of murder for which the Jews are accused. Also, the incidents of
this nature exclusively occurred only in places where the Jews live. We
must ask ourselves: In what type of circumstance can we attribute the renewed
cases of babies who suffered painful deaths--babies who were carefully tortured
up to the point of their tragic deaths--if an accusation is not
fair? What reason can we invent for the villainous torture of a
baby, if it is not done for religious mutilation? The external signs on corpses
indicate each time this is discovered, positively, that the death could not be
accidental in any case but intentional. And, it is obvious that
these injuries sustained by the babies are deliberately done and take place
over a long time: The whole body is poked or pricked. Then, scraps of
skin are cut.
The tongue was often cut out. The intimate parts of boys are either cut
out, or the boys were circumcised. Occasionally, other parts of the body are
cut out, and the palms are punctured. Signs of bruises from tight bandages put
on and removed again are not uncommon; often, the entire skin has abrasions as
if it was burnt or had something rubbing against it. Sometimes, the
corpse was even washed, with it being discovered
without any blood in it; nor was there any blood on the undergarments or
clothes, demonstrating that they were taken off during the murder and,
afterwards, put on again. The parents and siblings of babies who have
experienced such tragic deaths wonder: For what possible reason would people
commit such deplorable acts to innocent babies? Without a purpose, it could
never be done; yet it continues to happen repeatedly over time. The ordinary
killer, in any case, would be satisfied with one murder. But a murderer who
kills for some type of mysterious, important purpose cannot be rejected here.
The weak, unsatisfactory searching of investigators, the different tricks of
Jews, their impudent and stubborn denial, not infrequently a bribery, the
confidence by the majority of educated people in that an accusation is merely
the infamous slander and, finally, the humanity of our criminal laws--all these
things saved the Jewish culprits, nearly every time, from deserved
execution. And they--by using their machinations, by giving false
oath assurances of innocence, and by using false propaganda that suggested such
accusations were merely theresult of accomplished injustice with slander built
on them--almost always were well prepared for such accusations. The
Jews punished those who demonstrated credible evidence against them. In
the year 1817 [in
One expose of the subject of Ritual Murder was written in great detail by
Arnold S. Leese, entitled My Irrelevant Defense on Jewish Ritual Murder,
"Let a Jew speak for us here: 'Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was stated
(Jewish Encyclopedia, 1904, Vol.
Thus Lazare tries to absolve the Jews of the ritual murder charge by saying
that they were guilty, but that it was done from motives of sorcery, rather
than as a key element in the practice of the Jewish religion. He apparently has
not read the Bible, or noted Isaiah's denunciations of the Jews as sorcerers
and murderers of children. Of course the Jews killed children during their
rites of sorcery, as Lazare admits, but these horrors were committed as
essential rites of the Jewish religion.
Dr. Eric Bischoff, a famous German Jewish scholar, has found the explicit
authorization of the practice of Jewish ritual murder in the Thikunne Zohar,
Edition Berdiwetsch, 88b, a book of cabalistic ritual, as follows:
"Furthermore, there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of
strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the lawful
(Jewish) method. Those who do not ascribe themselves to the Jewish religious
law must be offered up as sacrifices to the (Jews) High God (Satan)."
Murders of Christian children by the Jews usually occur during the important
feast-days, Purim, one month before Easter, and Passover, at Easter. Jewish law
prescribes that the gentile victim at Purim, a Jewish holiday as the Jewish
victory over the gentiles, may be an adult.
Also if no gentile victim can be obtained, dried blood from a previous victim
may be used. However, a Jewish law is quite specific that the victim at
Passover must be a White Child (as the Whites are the True Israelites, and the
Jews know it) under seven years of age, who must be bled white, crowned with
thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and finally given the last blow by being
wounded in the side, the dagger prescribed to be in the hands of a rabbi, in a
complete re-enactment of the crucifixion of Christ.
This vindictive ceremony reassures the Jews that even if a few of the gentiles
are alerted to the nature of this people, as Christ talked against them, the
Jews will always win out by murdering the critic. Consequently, many critics of
the Jews are slain in these terrible ceremonies. In the
The elder Lindbergh had published a book which was burned by Federal agents
during World War I, even though he was a Congressman at the time. He was well
aware of the nature of the Jewish problem. Now that his son was a world-famous
man, after his feat of flying alone across the
They had already planned World War II, in which
Hauptmann's defense was that a Jew named Isidor Fisch had hired him to do some
carpenter work, and had paid him with the bills which proved to be from the
Lindbergh ransom money. Although the existence of Fisch was proven, he could
not be located during the trial. The court was like the one which had convicted
Jesus, for it only accepted evidence which the Jews allowed to be presented. In
reality, of course, one cannot believe anything which is accepted as evidence
in an American court, due to the facility of the Jews for manufacturing
evidence and due to the prevalence of Jewish lawyers and judges in all American
court rooms. This was also the first of many efforts of the Jews to vilify the
Germans so that
A book entitled The Jew, the Gypsy, and El Islam, indicates that the Talmudic
god of the Jews [Not the God of Christians] is a blood loving god:
"The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood pleasing to the
lord, viz: (1) that of Paschal holocaust [Easter sacrifice & the Feast of
Purim]; (2) that of circumcision."
According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. IV., p. 90, when performing
the operation of circumcision on children, the mohel (Jewish Rabbi who does the
circumcision):
"takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in
the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine
and blood into a receptacle provided."
Among the Jews themselves, the blood rite is an integral part of the ceremony
of circumcising Jewish males. According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI,
page 99, when performing the circumcision, the mohel, or circumciser,
"takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in
the operation and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and
blood into a receptacle provided."
What The Jewish Encyclopedia does not tell us is that this mixture of wine and
blood is then drunk by the rabbi, as a great delicacy. No other people in the world today enacts such a weird blood rite,
save, perhaps, some Stone-Age natives in the deepest jungles of the
The story, is that Xeroxes, King of Persia, became
enamored with a Jewess, Esther a prostitute, and made her Queen in place of his
rightful wife. Haman, the King's minister, complained to him of the conduct of
the Jews who, he said, did not keep the laws of the land, and obtained from the
King an order to slay them.
Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a
banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews
and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead
of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman's
ten sons, who were hanged. This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of
gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day
the Jewish bakers make cakes, laced with dried Christian blood, in the shape of
human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called
"Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism
of the Jews in our midst.
When a Ritual Sacrifice occurs at Purim, it is usually that of an adult
Christian who was murdered for his blood; the blood is then dried and the
powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried
blood of a Purim Sacrifice might sometimes be used for the following Passover.
When a Ritual Sacrifice is done at Passover, it is usually that of a Christian
child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who is not only
bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns,
tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by wounding in the side
in imitation of the murder of Christ. The blood taken from the child is then
mixed either in the powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread.
Another festival at which Ritual Sacrifice has sometimes been indulged in is
Chanucah (Which is called Hanukkah today) which occurs in December,
commemorating the recovery of
Although hate is the principal motive, superstitious traditions are also involved, one being the association of
blood-sacrifices with the idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that
Jewry cannot be saved unless every year the blood of a Christian is obtained
for the purpose of ritual consumption.
The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, pp. 266-267, gives a list of
Accusations of Ritual Murder (Sacrifices) made against the Jews through the
centuries; 122 cases are listed in chronological order, and no less than 39 of
them were made in the 19th century!
There were far more than double the number of Blood Accusations made in the
19th century than in any previous century, according to this authoritative
Jewish list.
The list of Ritual Murder Accusations made by a converted Jew, Cesare
Algranati, in 1913, and published in Cahiers Romains; there are listed 101
accusations, or which 28 were made in the 19th century and only 73 for all the
eight preceding centuries! Even the Jew Roth gives the argument away, for he
says: "The nineteenth century proved little less credulous than those
which proceeded it." (Ritual Murder Libel and The
Jew, 1935)
The fact that the charges increase in number as the age becomes more and more
enlightened is particularly significant, because the Jewish Money Power and its
silencing activities are more developed than ever before and has been
instrumental in reducing the number of charges by covering them up. It is
absolutely amazing that there are always influential Judeo-Christian men/women
who can be induced, when Jewish interests are at stake, will declare to all the world that there is nothing improper in not
attempting to examine these charges of Ritual Sacrifice by the Jews; and to
declare them as lies by "Anti-Semitic" authors.
Just as it is impossible for the lamb to abandon its
frisking and leaping, or the serpent its stinging, so the Jew cannot abandon
his lust for murdering Christians whenever he can. Yet the record is clear if
one is inclined to study and learn. Following are few such examples:
"Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa)
choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and devoured
their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and
sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and
others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were
killed. In
The second:
"Baena (
"La Campana (Seville): Reds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde Caraballo,
who either killed or was responsible for killing 11 persons in prison. The
prisoners were fired on until they fell, covered with petrol, and set on fire.
Some were still writhing in the flames when the city was entered. Lore
From The Magick, in Paris, France:
"...it was the theory of the ancient (Jewish) magicians that any living
being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and
health of the animal (non-Jews), and in quality according to its mental and
moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly.
The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or Triangle, as the
case may be, so that its energy cannot escape...For the highest spiritual
working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and
purest force. A (Christian) male child of perfect innocence and high
intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim." (Magick, by
Master Therion, published in 1929 by the Lecram Press, Paris, France)
A footnote on p. 95 says: "(4) It appears from the Magical Records of (the
Jew) Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an average
about 150 times every year between 1912 and 1928."
Even today the Jewish sects who keep the Passover by solar computation, indulge
in these bloody sacrifices of Christians on that feast-day; an account is given
of a visit to the scene of sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in this century, and
these words were used:
"I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is
withdrawn from the neck of the (Christian) lamb of sacrifice."
A paragraph from The B'nai B'rith Messenger, 1936:
"The sophisticated Pharisee (Jew) of the 20th century unceasingly gives
thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients. The
worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that which is not evident.
Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard themselves a victimized by that person
whose words or actions they do not understand. We love the obvious because it
flatters us, and hate the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with
faint praise. Riddles are irksome. (Which is why Christ
always spoke in parables when speaking before the Jewish Pharisees. They
did not like it, did not understand the parables and He knew it) The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with facts for his fetish,
the modernist is more foolish than his forebears. Decrying superstition, he is
most superstitious; rejecting fancies, he is the fanciful product of a
fictitious age. The modern world is bored with its own importance; life itself
has become a botheration. Suffering from chronic
ennui, how can a world ever become interested in anything but itself? Smothered
in their self-complacency, these all-sufficient ones ask for facts. But what
facts are there that fools can understand? How can the helpless superficial
grasp the hopelessly profound, for are not realities reserved for the wise
(Jews)?"
Although this paragraph is clothed in nonsense it is a picture of a Ritual
Sacrifice, with the victim crucified. And is merely showing the contempt the
Jew has for Christians because they cannot understand this type of wording.
Following in chronological order, where the death of the victim is perpetrated
by the Jews; and in light of the show by Ophra Winfry in 1989 we can clearly
see that there many cases of Ritual Sacrifice by Jews have been unsuspected and
undiscovered up to today, 1995, and will continue for years to come.
The earliest of historians, Herodotus, Informs us about the Jewish cult of
human sacrifice. He writes: "The Jews sacrificed humans to their god
Moloch." (Herodotus, Vol. II, p. 45) Christ said to the Jews: "Your
father was a murderer from the beginning." By this He meant Moloch-Jahweh,
the supreme Jewish devil. Also the prophets Isaiah 57:5, Jeremiah 7:30-31,
Ezekiel 26:26-30, and Micah 6:7 reproached the Jews for the abominable
offerings. Isaiah said:
"You enflame yourselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the
children in the valleys under the cliffs of the rocks!"
135. "There is no doubt that the...Jews aided the Persians with all the
men they could muster, and that the help they gave was considerable. Once
169. King Antiochus Epiphanes of
418. Baronius reports the crucifixion of a boy by the Jews at Imm, between
419. In the Syrian district of Imnestar between Chaleis and
614. After the conquest of
614. "I am gong to show that real religious persecution is uniquely
Jewish...In the time of Justinian, in the sixth century, the Jews massacred
Christians in
711. Another famous betrayal of a country by its Jews took place in
"While the Christians were in church, praying for the safety of their
country and religion, the Jews flung open the gates to the victorious Arabs
(Palm Sunday, 712 A.D.), receiving them with acclamations, and thus avenged
themselves for the many miseries which had befallen them in the course of a
century since the time of Reccared (The 'miseries' which the Jews claimed
prompted them to treason was explained by Professor Graetz. King
Reccard 'the most oppressive of all was the restraint touching the possession
of slaves. Henceforward the Jews were neither to purchase Christian
slaves nor to accept them as presents.')(History of the Jews, Vol. III, p. 46)
and Sisebut (The 'miseries' of King Sisebut was that he was annoyingly
determined to convert them to Christianity. History of the Jews, Vol. III, p.
46)). The capital also was entrusted by Tarik to the custody of the Jews, while
he pushed on in pursuit of the cowardly Visigoths, who had sought safety in
flight, for the purpose of recovering from them the treasure which they had
carried off.
"Finally when Musa Ibn-Nosair, the Governor of Africa, brought a second
army into
1144 A.D.
A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took
blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so
doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine; and that it
was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied;
Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne, but in this year to
Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St.
William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial.
(Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm,
There is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual
Murder and Sacrifice of St. William; the screen itself is in
"Modern enquirers, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded
that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit,
and was buried prematurely by his relatives." (The Ritual Murder Libel and
the Jew (1935), C. Roth)
How these so-called enquirers arrived at a conclusion like that after all those
years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest
that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a martyrdom
of a saint without having satisfied themselves that the wounds on the body
confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of the side. John Foxe's Acts and
Monuments of the Church records this Ritual Sacrifice,
as did the Bollandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who
afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that
the crime was one of Jewish Ritual Sacrifice. In The Dictionary of National
Biography (edited by a Jew) it is made clear that his career, apart from this
Ritual Sacrifice, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral
courage.
1160.
1171.
"It is not unnaturally claimed by Western Jews that Russian Jewry, as a
whole, is most bitterly opposed to Bolshevism. Now although there is a great
measure of truth in this claim, since the prominent Bolsheviks, who are
preponderantly Jewish, do not belong to the orthodox Jewish Church, it is yet
possible, without laying ones self open to the charge of antisemitism, to point
to the obvious fact that Jewry, as a whole, has, consciously or unconsciously,
worked for and promoted an international economic, material despotism which,
with Puritanism as an ally, has tended in an ever-increasing degree to crush
national and spiritual values out of existence and substitute the ugly and
deadening machinery of finance and factory. It is also a fact that Jewry, as a
whole, strove with every nerve to secure, and heartily approved of, the
overthrow of the Russian monarchy, which they regarded as the most formidable
obstacle in the path of their ambitions and business pursuits. All this may be
admitted, as well as the plea that, individually or collectively, most Jews may
heartily detest the Bolshevik regime, yet it is still true that the whole
weight of Jewry was in the revolutionary scales against the Czar's government.
It is true their apostate brethren, who are now riding in the seat of power,
may have exceeded their orders; that is disconcerting,
but it does not alter the fact. It may be that the Jews, often the victims of
their own idealism, have always been instrumental in bringing about the events
they most heartily disapprove of; that perhaps is the curse of the Wandering
Jew." 1179. Pontoise: A Christian boy named Richard was tortured,
crucified and bled white. Philip Augustus's chaplains and historians, Rigord
and Guillaume l'Armorician, attested this case. The body of the boy was taken
to the Church of the Holy Innocents in
1180.
(From this point on we will use the letters UJE - Listed in the Universal
Jewish Encyclopedia, instead of continually writing it out)
1181. Bury St. Edmunds: A Christian child called Robert was sacrificed at
Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there was
supposed to cause 'miracles.' (Rohrbacher, from the Chronicle
of Gervase of
1181. In
1191. The Jews of Braisme crucified a Christian who had accused them of
robbery and murder, after they had previously dragged him through the town. Due
to this eighty of them were burned by King Philip Augustus, who had personally
come to Braisme. (Rigordus, Hist. Gail)
1192. Braisne: Philip Augustus attended to this case personally, and had the
criminals burnt. It was a case of the crucifixion of a Christian sold to the
Jews by Agnes, Countess of Dreux, who considered him guilty of homicide and
theft. (Histoire des Ducs et Comtes de Champagne, IV, 1 st part, p. 72, Paris,
1865, by A. de Jubainville; Spec. Vinc., 129, c. 25; Gauin, L. 6, De Francis;
Magd. Cent., 12, c. 14, col. 1670)
1220. In Weissenburg in Alace on 29th of June, a boy, St. Heinrich, was
murdered by the jews. (Murer, Helveta sancta)
1225. In
1235. A Christian child was murdered and drained of his blood by the
Jews on December 1st in
1235.
1236. In Hagenau in
1238.
1239. A general uprising in
1240. In
1244.
1247.
1250.
1255.
1257. So that they could commit their annual sacrifice, the Jews of London
butchered a Christian child. (Cluvirius, epitome historiarum
p. 541, Col. 1)
1260. The Jews of Weissenburg killed a Christian child. (Annal. Colmariens)
1261.
1279.
1279. The most respectable Jews of London crucified a Christian child on April 2nd.
(Florent de Worchester, Chron. 222)
1282. In
1283. A Christian child was sold by his nurse to the Jews of Mainz, who
killed it. (Baroerus ad annum No. 61. Annalen von
Colmar)
1286. In
1286. Oberwesel, on the
1286. G. Friesland. A Christian child murdered for his blood. (UJE)
1286. In April, at Oberwesel on the
1287.
1288.
1290.
There are many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and
the existence of similar stores in
1292. In
1293. In Krems a child was sacrificed by the Jews. Two of the murderers
were punished, the others saved themselves through the
power of gold. (Monum. XI, 658)
1294. In
1302. In Reneken a Christian child was killed by the Jews. (Ann.
Colm., II, 32; Henri Desportes, Le mystere du sang, p. 70)
1303. At Weisssensee in Thuringen the young student Conrad, the son of a
soldier, was killed at Easter. His muscles were cut to pieces and his veins
were opened in order to drain all his blood.
1305. In
1320. In Puy, a Choir-boy of the local church was sacrificed.
1321. In
1331. At Uberlingen in present-day
1338. A noble from
1345. In
1347. In
1349. The Jews wanted to attack and kill the Christians assembled in their
church at Rothenburg. A Jew's maidservant exposed the Jewish murder plot, and
the Christians stormed out of their church and killed all the Jews.
1410. In Thuringa the Jews were driven out because of a Ritual Murder that was
discovered. (Boll. Ii, April 838. Baronius
31)
1429. At Ravensburg in
1440. A Jewish doctor in
1452. In
1453. In
1454. On the estates of Louis of Almanza in
succeeded in delaying the trial, since two of the three lawyers were of Jewish descent.
Thereafter the Jews were banished from
1462. Rinn,
The Abbe Vacandard, defender of the Jews, says there was no trial. Well, of
course there wasn't. Even in 1995 there is no trial for a crime where the
criminals have escaped! The boy was sanctified by Pope Benedict XIV, in his
Bull Beatus Andreas,
1468. Sepulveda,
1470. In
1475. Simon of Trent: "In the year 1475, when the Jews of Trent met
in their synagogue on Tuesday in Holy Week, to deliberate preparations for the
approaching festival of the Passover, which fell that year on Thursday
following, they came to a resolution of sacrificing to their inveterate hatred
of the Christian name, some Christian infant on the Friday following, or Good
Friday. A Jewish physician undertook to procure such an infant for the horrid
purpose. And while the Christians were at the office of Tenebrae on Wednesday
evening, he found a child called Simon, about two years old, whom by caresses
and by showing him a piece of money, he decoyed from the door of a house, the
master and mistress whereof had gone off to Church, and carried him off.
"The customs of the Jews are base and abominable and owe their persistence
to their depravity. Jews are extremely loyal to one another, always ready to
show compassion, but towards every other people they feel only hate and
enimity. As a race (the Jews are not a race, because they have mingled with the
other races to the point that they are only a people, not a race), they are
prone to lust; among themselves nothing is unlawful." "On Thursday
evening the principal Jews shut themselves up in a chamber adjoining to their
synagogue, and at
"The magistrates and parents making strict search after the lost child,
the Jews hid it first in a barn of hay, then in a cellar, and at last threw it
into a river. But God countered all their endeavors to prevent the discovery of
the fact, which being proved upon them, with its several circumstances, they
were put to death, the principal actors in the tragedy being broken upon the
wheel and burned. The synagogue was destroyed, and a chapel was erected upon
the spot where the child was martyred. God honored this innocent victim with
many miracles. The relics lie in a stately tomb in St. Peter's Church at
During this ceremony, the Jews identify Christ as the God of the Christians;
they do not claim Him as a Jew, as do so many of our so-called Christian
religious leaders. Also, they could not conceal the body and hide their crime,
for the Talmud forbids the burial of a gentile "beast." As in many
such cases of ritual murder, a Jewish physician obtained the gentile victim,
because Jewish doctors have many opportunities to steal away gentile children.
There are now many Jewish hospitals in the
In many such cases, the child has been removed to a synagogue and murdered by
the prescribed ritual. The bloodless body of the victim is then turned over to
the parents. This procedure also obeys the Jewish prohibition against the
burial of a gentile, for the Jews simply allow the parents to take care of the
burial.
It, therefore, behooves American parents to avoid leaving their children
unguarded in the presence of a Jewish physician or placing the child in a
hospital run by Jews. Any parent should think twice about abandoning a helpless
child to a people which has a history of five thousand years of murdering
children under such horrible circumstances. And any parent should be able to
visualize the horror of the handsome, perfectly formed body of the child on
which they have lavished such loving care, being stripped and laid down on a
table while Jews, their eyes filled with blood lust and hatred of the
Christians, gather round the child and pierce its flesh, and drink its blood,
and call down curses upon the name of Jesus Christ. Can any parent really wish
to place its child in such danger and to have it die in such terrible
circumstances?
1476. The Jews in
1480. In
1480. At Motta in
1485. In Vicenza St. Laurentius was butchered by the Jews. (Pope Benedict XIV
Bull. Beatus Andreas)
1490. At Guardia near
1494.
1503. In Langendenzlingen a father handed his 4 year old child over to
two Jews from Waldkirchen in
1505. A murder, similar to the one in Langendenzlingen in 1503, was attempted
at Budweis in
1509. The Jews in Bosingen (
1510. In Berlin the jews Salomon, Jacob, Aaron, Levi Isaac, Rabbi Mosch
and the butcher Jacob were accused of buying a three or four year old Christian
boy for 10 florins from a stranger, laying him on a table in a cellar, and
puncturing him with needles in the large blood rich veins until he was finally
slaughtered by the butcher Jacob. An enormous trial began, and eventually a
hundred Jews who were involved in the crime were licked in the
1510.
1520. The Jews in
1525. A Ritual Murder in
1540. At Sappenfeld in
1547. At Rava in Poland 2 Jews stole a tailor's boy named Michael and crucified
him. (Acta sancta II. Bd. des April
p. 839)
1569. In Vitov (
1571. M.A. Bradaginus was butchered by the Jews. (Seb.
1573. In
1574. At Punia in
1575. The Jews killed the Christian child Michael of Jacobi. (Henri
Desportes, Le mystere Dusang)
1586. In a series of cases Christian children were snatched away from their
parents and killed; by breaking down these crimes Rupert traced them back to
the Jews. (Brouver Trier'schen Ann. v. J. 1856)
1592. At Wlna a 7 year old Christian boy Simon was horribly tortured to
death by the Jews. More than 170 wounds, made by knives and scissors, were
found on his body, besides the numerous cuts under this finger and toe nails. (Acta sancta III. Bd. des Juli)
1595. At Costyn in Posen a Christian child was tortured to death by the Jews. (Acta sancta 389)
1597. In Szydlov the blood of a Christian child was used in the
consecration of the new synagogue. The eyelids, necks, veins, limbs, and even
the sexual organs of the child showed countless punctures. (Acta sancta, II Bd.
des April)
1598. In the
1650. At Kaaden in Steiermark, 5½ year old Mathias Tillich was butchered
by a Jew on March 11th. (Tentzel, monatl. Unterred. v. Juli 1693 p. 553)
1655. At Tunguch in
1665. In
1669. On the way from
1670.
1675. At Miss in
1684. In the
1698.
1748.
1753.
1753.
1753. On Good Friday, the 20th of April, in a village near
1764. The 10 year old Christian son of Johann Balla, who had disappeared on the
19th of June from Orkul (
1791. On the 21st of February, the corpse of 13 year old Andreas Takals,
who lived with a Jew named Abraham was found outside a
village near Tasnad (Siebenburgen). The blood had been drained from him by
severing his jugular vein. (
1791. At the same time two blood murders were reported at Holleschau (Moravia)
and at Woplawicz in the district of Duplin. (Tisza-Eslar, v. e. Ungar. Abgeord)
1791. During the reign of Sultan Selim III, the Jews in Pera killed a young
Greek by hanging him from a tree by his legs. (Henri Desportes, Le mystere du
sang)
1803. On March 10th the 72 year old Jew Hirsch from Sugenheim seized a 2 year 4
month old child between Ullstadt and Lengenfeld in Buchhof near
1804. In Grafenberg near
1810. Among the records of the
1812. On the island
1817. The indictment of the murder committed in this year against the little
Christian girl Marianna Adamovicz, was quashed due to a lapse of time.
1823.
The boy had been taken to the school where a number of Jews were assembled,
laid in a trough, and all present had made stabs with a nail in his side and
temples. When the boy died under this torture, his body was taken to a wood by
two of the converted Jewesses; and the third woman took a bottle of the blood
of the boy to the Jewess innkeeper aforesaid. Next day,
the Rabbi's wife took the three women again to the school where the Jews were
gathered; bottles were filled from the trough by means of a funnel, and the
Rabbi dipped a nail into the blood and dropped a little on a number of pieces
of cloth, one piece of which was given to everyone present. The case went to
the Imperial Council at
1824. In
1826. In
1827. At Vilna in
1829. In
1831.
1834. According to the testimonyof the Jewess Ben Noud who converted to
Christianity, an old gentile man in
1839. On the
1839. In
1837-47. Buffeto, Fiorenzola, Monticelli, and
1840.
But "owing to the efforts of Count Camondo, Cremieux and Montefiore"
(to quote from the Jewish Encyclopedia) "a firman was obtained from the
Sultan which declared all accusations of ritual murder null and void."
The Jews were released. Now Camondo, Cremieux and Montefiore were all rich
Jews. Cremieux and Montefiore also figured in the
"Those other lands were Christian, and they boiled with bigotry. The
rulers themselves were more or less tolerant, for they depended upon Jews as
their financiers. But the lower classes had no use for them, and butchered them
whenever a righteous excuse could be found. And righteous excuses were not
wanting. If a plague broke out, of course the Jews had poisoned the wells. If a
war was lost, of course the Jews had aided the enemy. If a boy mysteriously
disappeared, of course the Jews had murdered him to procure blood for their
Passover drink..." There cannot be a shadow of doubt that the proceedings
in this case were stopped by the force of the Jewish Money Power, in spite of
the efforts of "the Greek clergy and the European consuls."
1840. The
Achille Laurent, a Member of the Societe Orientale, brought together the full
details of the trial of the culprits as reported in Arab newspapers at the
time, and he published the hole facts of the case,
which was produced in
The Jews were preparing for the Purim feast which was to take place on
When he arrived the Jews immediately attacked, gagged and bound him up. They
then dragged him into a secret room, and sent for the Jewish barber Soliman.
The Pries was laid on a table and his head was held over a copper bowl. The
barber seized theold priest by the beard, while the Jew Aaron Arari held his
head, and his brother Davud Arari (the priest's friend) slit his throat. The
blood was collected in the copper bowl and filled the bottles.
Shortly afterwards the Priest's servant Ibrahim Amara appeared in the Jewish
ghetto. The Jewish Arari brothers, who were standing in front of the house,
said to him: "Come on in, your Master is with us." IbrahimAmara was
butchered in the same way as his master Father Thomas.
The next day the priest was missed and a search was made for him. The barber
Soliman was suspect due to papers which were found on him belonging to the
priest. The French Consul, Ratti-Menton, under whom the priest had served, and
the sheriff Pascha led the investigating. Soloman made a full confession and
was convicted. Traces of blood were found and pieces of the priest and his
servant's body were found in the sewer. After this all the Jews that took part
in the murder were arrested, and three of them confessed to the crime in
detail.
They were Mourad el Fath'al, the gentile servant of Davud Arari, and the Jews
Aslam-Farkhi and Monca Abou el Afieh. The latter was a rabbi. He confessed that
he himself had carried the blood that had been collected in bottles to the
Grand Rabbi Yakoub el-Antabi. After a through investigation the three Jews who
confessed were pardoned. Ten others who took part in the murder were sentenced
to death. Their names were Davud Arari, Aaron Arari, Isaac
Arari, the rabbi Bokhor Youda (called Salonikli), Mechir Farkhi, Mourad Farkhi,
Aaron Stambouli, Isaac Picciotto, Yacoub Abou-el-Afieh, and Youcef Menakem Farkhi.
In the meantime the murder and trial was published by the press throughout
Upon the gravestone, in arabic and Italian, was
inscribed: "Here lie the remains of Father Thomas of
1843. Murders of Christian children by the Jews on
1875. At Zboro, in the country of Saros in
1879. In
1879. At Kutais in the
1881. At Kaschau in
1881. In Steinamanger the eight year-old grand-daughter of a coachman who
worked for the Jews disappeared.
1881. In
1881. In the Galician town of
1882. At
1882. At Galata, the ghetto of
1882. A short-time later another very similar case in Galata. Serious, a
distinguished lawyer of the Greek community, sent a petition to the
representatives of all the Christian European power at Constantinople so that
justice might be done; but the Jews bribed the Turkish police, who allowed
certain documents in the case to disappear. Bribed doctors declared the mother
of the kidnaped and murdered child to be mentally deranged.
1883. Once more a ritual murder in Galata. The police, bribed with Jewish
money, prevented an investigation. The newspaper "Der Stamboul,"
which strongly spoke out against the guilty ones, was suppressed. This
suppression cost the jews 140,000 francs.
1884. At Sturz (
1885. At Mit-Kamar in
1888. At Breslu in July, a crime was committed by Max Bernstein, a 24 year old
rabbinical candidate at the Talmudic College, against a 7 year-old boy, Severin
Hacke, whom Bernstein had enticed into his room. Bernstein withdrew blood from
the boy's sex organ. After the Judge's verdict Bernstein confessed: "The
Bible and the Talmud tach that the gravest of sins can only be atoned for
through innocent blood." Therefore, he had withdrawn blood from the boy.
The Jews recognized the danger and declared Bernstein to be a "Religious
Maniac."
1891.
1891. Murder of a 5 year-old robust boy of the Catholic cabinet maker,
Hegemann, was found by the maid Dora Moll, in the cow shed of the town
councilor Kuppers, with his legs spread apart, laying on his side with a
circular formed ritual cut, carried out by a skilled hand, and bled white. The
boy was already missed at
1899. The Polna Case (
Three Jews, the junk-peddler Leopold Hilsner of Polna and his racial comrades
Ebermann and Wassermann on
He explained how he had chained the girl, with the help of the Jews Erbmann and
Wassermann, and cut her throat. The blood was collected in a bucket. One of the
helpers carried it away by train where it was used for ritual purposes. Hilsner
first made a confession to one of his fellow-prisoners, then to Inspector
Miska, and then to the trial judge Baudisch. He repeated this confession over
and over. The jury of Kuttenberg sentenced him to death by hanging. As in the
case of Father Thomas the Jewish press began to rave and scream during the
trial and demand that Hilsner be set free. However, their attack failed against
the incorruptibility and integrity of the appeals court judge, Dr. Schneider.
With a will of iron he conducted a completely impartial trial.
Hilsner and his Jewish lawyers appealed the sentence. The government, which was
influenced by the press and bribed by Jewish money, granted a new trial at
Piseck. During this new investigation it was discovered that Leopold Hilsner
had committed a second Ritual Murder. On
This, however, was not the end of this extraordinary case. In 1918, Marxist
Jews under the leadership of the Jews Viktor Adler, otto Bauer, and Julius
Dutsch revolted. The Jews remembered their comrade Hilsner.
The prison doors were opened to him and the murderer and human butcher was joyously
greeted and put into a Jewish old folks' home. Several years later he died and
was buried in an honorary grave in
1900.
Winter was ritually murdered. The murder was carried out in the cellar of the
Jewish butcher, Mortiz Levi, after the victim had been lured there by a young
Jewess. On the day of the murder, a large number of foreign Jews were in Konitz
who departed the next day without any plausible reason being given for their
visit. Among them were the butchers Haller from Tuchel, Hamburger from
Schlochau, Eisendtedt from Prechlau and Rosenblum from Ezersk. The Konitz
butcher Heimann disappeared shortly after the murder. The culprits were never discovered,
but two Jewish agents were sentenced to imprisonment for false witness and for
the subornation of witnesses during the enquiry.; and
B. Nachod. (UJE)
1911-13.
But the jury agreed as to the cause of the boy's death; their verdict about
this was as follows: "The boy after being gaged, was wounded with a
perforating instrument in the nape of the neck, temples and neck, which wounds
severed the cerebral vein, the left temporal and jugular arteries, producing
thus profuse hemorrhage; and afterwards, when Joutchinski (the boy's name) had
lost about five glasses of blood, his body was pierced with the same
instrument, lacerating thus the lungs, the liver, the right kidney and the heart,
where the last wounds were inflicted, in all 47 wounds, causing acute suffering
to the victim and the loss of practically all the blood of the body, and
finally death."
However, the trial ended with the release of Beiliss, but at the same time the
court established that the murder had taken place inside the Jewish brickyard,
which was the religious center of the Kiev Jews, for the purpose of obtaining
blood. Almost all of the prosecutors, witnesses, and authorities
who had spoken out against Judaism, later fell victim to the Bolshevik Terror.
1917. "The Red Terror became so wide-spread that it is impossible to give
here all the details of the principal means employed by the [Jewish] Cheka(s)
to master resistance; one of the most important is that of hostages, taken
among all social classes. These are held responsible for any anti-Bolshevist
movements (revolts, the White Army, strikes, refusal of a village to give its
harvest etc.) and are immediately executed. Thus, for the assassination
of the Jew Ouritzky, member of the Extraordinary Commission of Petrograd,
several thousands of them were put to death, and many of these
unfortunate men and women suffered before death various tortures inflicted by
cold-blooded cruelty in the prisons of the Cheka.
"I have in front of me photographs taken at Kharkoff, in the presence of
the Allied Missions, immediately after the Reds had abandoned the town; they
consist of a series of ghastly reproductions such as: Bodies of three workmen
taken as hostages from a factory which went on strike. One had his eyes burnt,
his lips and nose cut off; the other two had their hands cut off. The bodies of
hostages, S. Afaniasouk and P. Prokpovitch, small landed proprietors, who were
scalped by their executioners;
"Human skin torn from the hands of several victims by means of a metallic
comb. This sinister find was the result of a careful inspection of the
cellar of the Extraordinary Commission of Kharkoff. The retired general
Pontiafa, a hostage who had the skin of his right hand torn off and the genital
parts mutilated.Mutilated bodies of women hostages: S. Ivanovna, owner of a
drapery business, Mme. A.L. Carolshaja, wife of a colonel, Mmo. Khlopova, a property owner. They had their breasts slit and
emptied and the genital parts burnt and having trace of coal.
"Bodies of four peasant hostages, Bondarenko, Pookhikle, Sevenetry, and
Sidorfehouk, with atrociously mutilated faces, the genital parts having been
operated upon by Chinese torturers in a manner unknown to European doctors in
whose opinion the agony caused to the victims must have been dreadful.
"It is impossible to enumerate all the forms of savagery which the Red
Terror took. A volume would not contain them. The Cheka of Kharkoff, for
example, in which Saenko operated, had the specialty of scalping victims and
taking off the skin of their hands as one takes off a glove...At Voronege the
victims were shut up naked in a barrel studded with nails which was then rolled
about. Their foreheads were branded with a red hot iron FIVE POINTED
1926. The bodily remains of the children Hans and Erika Fehse were found in a
parcel on the public square in
1928. The college sophomore Helmut Daube was butchered on the night of the
On the night of the 22nd to the 23rd of March (it was the time of the Purim
Festival) a shocking murder happened in
There was no doubt that this was a case of Ritual Murder. The experts stated in
court that the throat wound was an artistically performed cut that went in a
circular form from ear to ear. It is very possible that Helmuth Daube was
circumcised before the butchering. Since the circumcision would have proven
that Ritual Murder had been committed, the genitals of the victim were
completely removed. The Jewish press distracted the public's attention from
this Purim murder and wrote that it was a sex murder. It directed suspicion
toward the young friend of Daube, Huszmann. The prosecution of this case was
conducted by the public prosecutor Rosenbaum, a Jew! Huzzmann was indicted. The
investigation was not carried out by the
When the trial came up, the Jewish press from all over
1928. The murder at Manau. The boy Karl Kessler was found butchered and
bloodless on
1928.
There was no blood about where the body was found and it was bloodless. Experts
said in Court that the throat showed the Jewish ritual cut. The Jews set to
work and eventually a young Gentile called Huszmann was accused of the murder,
unnatural lust being alleged as a feature in the crime.
The case was conducted against Huszmann by a Jew called Rosenbaum, and special
police had been sent from
1929. G. Manau,
The Ritual Murder of Manau: In
From that moment on he was never seen alive again. He did not come home in the
evening. The village became alarmed, and then his body was found in a small
wooded area not far from Manau. It was fully-clothed and had one large wound, a
deep incision in the neck which had severed the artery. From the broken
branches lying around it was evident that the boy had put up a struggle.
The knife had been used several times. Near the throat artery smaller stab
wounds were found. Also a light incision had been made across the throat from
ear to ear. It looked exactly like a ritual cut except that it was only skin
deep. The murderer had committed Ritual Murder symbolically, then, like a
Ritual Murder, caused the victim to bleed to death by slicing the throat
artery. Technically it was a ritual slaughter in the "lawfully
manner" prescribed by the Jewish law of Human Sacrifice. The child's body
was completely drained of blood.
On the right thigh and right forearm there were marks of where pressure had
been applied. This indicated that the boy must have been held upside down for a
while to insure that he bled to death quickly. There was no blood found at the
scene of the murder. It had been curried away. All these clues proved: That
Karl Kessler was the victim of a Ritual Murder. Also the killing occurred just
before Passover. It was suspicious that the day after the murder a Jewish
butcher from Hofheim disappeared forever.
The body of Karl Kessler was examined by the coroner, Dr. Burgel of Bamber.
After noting the characteristic marks he stated: "We are dealing here with
a Ritual Murder." The entire populace was of the same opinion. "A
child murdered before Passover; the throat cut through, the blood drained, the
Jews had done it!" This opinion spread like wild-fire throughout the
entire region. An intense bitterness and animosity seized the community. The
crime was take up by Der Sturmer, meetings were held
by the National Socialists, and Jewish feelings made tremendous strides.
Immediately all of Jewry began to howl. They began to agitate within their
political parties, and send delegates from one official to the next. The
government (Bavarian National Party) was threatened by the Jews. It promptly
took action. The police, the court, and the public prosecution all received similar
instructions. The public prosecutor's office was forced to issue a statement
saying that the case was not one of Ritual Murder, even though the proceedings
were still pending and the facts were not all clear. Teachers were given orders
to instruct their children that Ritual Murder did not exist and belonged in the
realm of fantasy.
The affair came up in the diet. The Culture Minister Goldenberger (Bavarian
National Party) intervened on behalf of his "Jewish national
comrades" with suspicious fervor. In
One of them ran: "Public Declaration, The loathsome crime of the child
murder at Manau is again giving unprincipled instigators the welcomed
opportunity to spread among the populace the tale of Ritual Murder, branded
countess times as a lie.
"This infamous charge was raised equally unjustified against the
Christians in the first centuries of Christianity, just as it is now raised
against the jews. We feel it a disgrace that Judaism
is forced to defend itself against such a scandalous charge which must appear
to even the most superficial reader of the Bible as a deception based on
hatred.
"Herewith we declare most solemnly: ?The sources
of Jewish teaching, especially the Talmud, contain no word which could even
remotely be interpreted in the sense of this devilish accusation. Also no sect or ?tribe' of any kind, as maintained in anti-Jewish
statements, has ever advocated such an hideous doctrine or been guilty of such
a deed.
"This solemn declaration is fully endorsed by the fundamental works of the
most important Christian scholars, of the Catholic
priest Dr. Frank of Konigshofen, and the Protestant Professor and Privy
Councillor Strack of
"The Ritual Murder lie is a product of dark hatred, a defamation of our
faith which we repudiate with the deepest indignation. We are prepared to prove
the truth of this declaration against all defamers before every court.'
"The Governing Committee of the Bavarian Rabbinical Conference Rabbi Dr.
Fruedenthal, Nuremberg; Rabbi Dr. Stein, Schweinfurt; Rabbi Dr. Baerwald,
Munich; Rabbi Dr. Hanover, Wurzbburg; Rabbi Dr. Solomon, Bayreuth; Rabbi Dr.
Wohlgemuth, Kitzingen; and District Rabbi Dr. Ephraim, Burgpreppach."
Der Sturmer replied to this declaration. It was confiscated and banned. The
laughable adore of the Jewish government of that time and certain bureaucratic
creatures went so far, that a high court judge explained to the press:
"The acceptance of a Ritual Murder is absurd and ridiculous. The boy most
likely accidentally hit a tree-branch (The stab wound was 12 inches deep!) or
was attacked by a hungry deer." (Thus the high court judge, to please the
Jews, excluded the deer from the species herbivores and ranked it under the
carnivores and beasts of prey! Besides, in March the deer do not have antlers
(with which Kessler's throat was supposed to have been pierced), but only a
very sensitive and soft, so called "bast."
The "child murder of Manau" passed, as was expected, into obscurity.
The perpetrators were never found. Unatoned, the spilled blood screamed
heavenward.
1932. Martha Kaspar was butchered and dismembered at
In
The Purim Feast was approaching. Then one morning Martha Kaspar disappeared.
This was on
It struck the neighbors odd that Martha Kaspar was not to be seen anymore. They
discussed it among themselves and the rumor spread all over
It appeared that it had been purposely placed there with the intention of
leading the public to believe: "This is a sex murder." The young
couple reported their horrible finding to the police. Promptly the Jewish press
began to cry that "Martha Kaspar was the victim of a sex murder," and
promptly the police fell for it.
The police began a thorough search of the house and discovered the
blood-stained clothes of Kurt Meyer and traces of blood in the hay-loft. Kurt
and Moritz Meyer were arrested. At first Kurt Meyer denied everything, but his
mother demanded that he take all the guilt upon himself so that his father
would be set free. So that the ain danger which faced the Jews could be avoided
the father began to talk like a lunatic. Due to constant pressure by the Jewish
lawyer, Dr. Frank, he was put into an insane asylum and then set free. He
immediately fled abroad (This acquittal was so shocking and unbelievable that
one can only understand it if they knows that at this time the entire
government and legal system was Jewish through and through) Moritz Meyer's son
then made his "confession."
He claimed that he had "attempted an abortion," and as a result
Martha Kaspar had bled to death. He explained to the court that he had
attempted this abortion without any instruments, and that he had done it
several times to cows with success. Afterwards (because he was a butcher) he
had dismembered the body.
In the meantime pieces of flesh were found everywhere. The Jew had cut Martha
Kaspar into pieces of flesh which weighted about a pound each, and together
with his father had scattered them throughout
The most peculiar thing was that no blood was found anywhere. A small pool of
blood was found in the hay-loft and at most contained only a half pint. It
turned out that all the pieces of her flesh were completely drained of blood.
The police detectives and an expert German doctor testified during the trial
that several quarts of blood had disappeared. One detective said that he
believe it was carried away in bottles.
The trial lasted from September 13th until
It was established during the trial that the "confession" of the Jew
about an attempted abortion was a lie. This was proven by the pieces of flesh
that had been found. The Jew finally admitted tearfully that he had beaten
Martha Kaspar to death in a "fit of rage." The court accepted this
second "confession" with gratitude. They were noticeably relived that
the question of Ritual Murder had not arisen. The state prosecutor pleaded
"murder," and the court accepted "manslaughter." Kurt Meyer
was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
"It is incomprehensible to me why these murderous snorting beasts were not
exterminated long ago. Would not wild animals who eat
humans be killed at once, even if they resembled humans. And are the Jews
anything else but voracious cannibals?"
In reality the whole trial was a comedy which challenged the credibility of the
judicial system. The murder of Martha Kaspar was obviously a Purim butchering.
It was established that, shortly before the murder, people had gathered in
secret at the Jew's house, and then disappeared on the day of the murder. It
was also proven that the old Jew Mortiz Meyer went to the Synagogue immediately
after the murder. It is also known that the entire Jewish Meyer family left
The truth in this case is as follows: Kurt Meyer together with his father and
most likely other Jews (rabbis?) Butchered Martha Kaspar.
He butchered her in the attic, her head was held over the trap-door by the Jews
and her blood was collected in a bucket.
The two assistants carried the blood away and the old Jew went to the synagogue
where he either reported the deed or prayed to his God Baal, Satan, Lucifer, or
Devil. The body was then dismembered so that the ritual cut would not be
discovered. In this trial too, Der Sturmer, pointed out that a Ritual Murder
had taken place. The consequences of this action was:
confiscation and banning of Der Sturmer, and the start of legal action against
its editors.
The Jew Kurt Meyer accepted the judgment of the
Ritual Murder At Passover: Ritual Murder at the time
of the Passover is similar in certain respects to the Purim feast. The Purim
feast commemorates the day of the Persian murders, while the Passover
commemorates the day when Christ was murdered.
At the Purim feast the Jews murder an adult Christian as a replacement for
Haman, while at the Passover they murder an innocent Christian child as a
replacement for Christ. Purim murder is usually a plain and simple butchering,
but on the other hand the Passover murder is usually a torturous death. In both
cases, however, the object is to obtain blood which is used for ritual
purposes. And both crimes occur out of a desire to murder and torture and from
a hatred for Christians and non-Jews. The sacrifice, however, of a human being
on Passover has existed, not only since the murdering of Christ; but is as old
as the Jewish people themselves. For centuries it was their custom to sacrifice
a lamb, a cock, or a monkey at this festival in place of a Christian human. The
lamb is used as a substitute for an innocent Christian child.
Typical examples of Ritual Murder at Passover are: The Confession of The Jewess
Ben Noud: Ben Noud, born in Aleppo, confessed to the Orientalist, Count
Durfort-Civrac, that at the age of seven (in 1826) she traveled from Lattakia
to Antioch, and there, while staying in a Jewish home she witnessed the Jews
hanging two Christian children from the ceiling by their feet. One of the
children was about five and the other around twelve years old.
Frightened by this spectacle, she ran to her aunt and told her what she had
seen. The aunt laughed at her and explained that it was probably only two
naughty boys being punished. To get her mind off of it, Ben Noud's aunt sent
her to the "Bizaar." When she returned the two bodies had
disappeared, but she noticed a brass vase on the floor, which the Arabs call
"laghen," completely filled with blood.
The Confessions of The Jew Emanuel of Genoa: As early as the year 1600 there
were people who defended the Jews. They took the Jews under their protection
and wrote books in their favor. Dr. Eck, a contemporary of Martin Luther, wrote
in reply to these defenders of the Jews.
The latter wrote a treatise in which he maintained that there was no such thing
as Ritual Murder, and that a grave injustice was being done to the Jews. Dr.
Eck's book, written in reply to this, was entitled Ains Judenbuchlein
Verlegung. After a stint as consul at
Dr. Eck wrote:
"Because he (the pro-Jewish author) makes the claim that no baptized Jew
has ever acknowledged such a crime on the part of the Jews. I am replying: Not
all Jews are guilty of these crimes, for they well know what the punishment for
such a crime is. Therefore, only very few Jews have taken part in these
murders. Besides that, it is not true that no baptized Jews have ever
acknowledged a child murder. For example, Emanuel (baptized
in the Year of Our Lord 1456), son of the doctor Solomon of Genoa, testified to
the martyrdom of two Christian children after he had become a Christian.
One of these cases was reported second hand. He related how Master Simon from
"He stated: ?My father led me into a house where
eight Jews were assembled. They took a sacred oath that they would rather
suffer death or kill themselves before they would confess the deed they were
going to commit. After that they brought in a two year old Christian child. One
Jew held its right arm, another his left arm, and the
third one held his head so that he formed the shape of a cross. The fourth
violator had a long, sharp, pointed needle or scalpel in his hand. With it he
stabbed the child from his stomach to the heart. He quickly pulled the needle
back and stabbed once more so that the blood began to flow freely from the
wounds into a basin held beneath.
"This was repeated until the child died. They then threw the child's body
into a secret chamber. After wards, they dipped slices of apples, pears and
other fruits into the blood and ate them.' He, Emanuel, ate some of them
himself. This made him so nauseated that he was unable to eat for two days. He
felt as if his bowels wanted to come out of him. He stated he felt this way
before as well as after his baptism which took place at Valle, in
The Torture And Death of The Boy of Langendentzlingen:
In the 2nd chapter, Dr. Eck writes:
"So that the believing reader will not be hindered by further discussion,
and the defenders of the Jews will not be able to say that Dr. Eck has no proof
for what he says; I would like to report an account of Ritual Murder. I did not
learn of this from hearsay, but from having seen the victim with my own eyes.
In the year 1503, when I raveled from
"He maintained his innocence even to the executioner and went calmly to
his death. The Jews had "gestupft" his child to death. (Gestupft
means: to torture to death by pricking with a needle). In this case the
slanderer of Christians cannot say that the actions of the authorities were due
to their desire for Jewish property. Chief among thee authorities was Herr
Konrad Sturtzel of Kinzingen, under whose jurisdiction Buchen came; a man who
was known in the four countries of Alsace, Breisgau, Suntgau and Tirol as a man
of honor, Who with manliness and diligence maintained his loyalty at all times
despite offered bribes and gifts, to his prince - Duke Sigmund of Austria, and
who was never led by threats to forsake his lord or his honesty and
faithfulness. Furthermore, I have seen the Christian who received the child's
blood from the Jews of Waldkirchen so that he could carry it to the Jews in
"There were, from both districts, a great number of people present at the
site of the execution. All this, my Jew-defender, is certain,
it is evidentia facti, for the child was seen by everyone. One could see and
touch the punctures and wounds. Even though the Jews did not torture this child
as unmerciful and horrible as they did the child of Sappenfeld here in the
bishopric of Eichstatt, the facts of the case remain the same.
Furthermore, I have not yet finished, and will sing many a song to the defender
of the Jews until their ears are ringing."
The Torture and Death of Saint Simon: The small Simon, a little boy from
When night fell, the twin brothers Saligman and Samuel, with Tobias, Vitalis
(Veitel) Moses strangled him with a handkerchief as he lay across Samuel's
knee, pieces of flesh from his neck were cut with a knife and the blood
collected in a bowl. At the same time, they punctured the naked offering with
needles and murmured Jewish curses. They then cut pieces of flesh from the
boy's arms and legs and imitated the crucifixion by holding the twitching body
upside down and the arms outstretched and luring this horrible act they spoke
the following: "Take this, crucified Jesus. Just as our forefathers did
once, so may all Christians by land and sea perish."
They then rushed to their meal. When the child had died they threw his body in
the river which flowed by their house. After this, they joyously celebrated
Passover.
The case was prosecuted by Bishop Hinderbach, and the Jews were sentenced to
death. Immediately, all the Jews in the area protested the sentence and
succeeded in gaining a new trial for the accused. It was tried before Guidici
of Ventimiglia, and he confirmed the sentence. Again because of Jewish
protests, the case came before the court of Pope Sixtus IV. He commissioned the
greatest and most famous professor of law at that time, Panvino, to serve as
Chief Justice. Assisted by six cardinals, he too confirmed the sentence. The
court stated: "The Jews killed the little boy Simon, in order
to obey a rabbinical religious law; their motive being to serve a most wicked
piety and devotion by obtaining Christian blood for the celebration of
Passover.'
The records of this trial were originally kept in the secret archive of the
Citadel of St. Angelo and were then transferred to the
The Torture and Death of Feodor Jemeljanov: On
This savagery was carried out on the child while he was naked,
the body was then washed and dressed again, because the clothes showed not the
slightest trace of blood. From the carriage tracks found nearby you could see
that a two horse carriage had been turned off the road and driven to a suitable
spot. From there the body was carried a little further and thrown down at the
edge of a swamp.
The case was investigated. After years of investigation and hearings, the crime
was solved. A large number of Jews were arrested. They were: Channa Zetlin,
Slavka
"On Monday of the following week, the Jewess Channa served the two women
with wine and took them to the
"She swore to remain silent. The Jews began their incantations and
Terentjeva held the child over a bowl while Maximova washed it. Afterwards he
was put into a barrel from which the bottom half was removable. After Jossel
had put the bottom half of the barrel back together again, he began, with the
help of Terentjeva, to roll it about on the floor. Then all the others joined
in and helped, working in pairs, they relieved each other every two hours. The
child was removed very red, as if he had been scalded. (This agrees completely
with the testimony given by the doctor). Teretjeva wrapped him up in a cloth
and laid him on the table; all three women dressed themselves in Jewish clothes
and carried the child to the school.
"The Jews followed behind them. At the school there were already a number
of Jews, who laid the boy into a trough on the table which was lined with
nails. Terentjeva tied the little boy's feet together below his knees. Then a
large, sharp nail was given to Terentjeva, who was ordered to stab the boy in
the temple and sides with it. All the Jews, one after the other, did the same.
Orlik twisted and turned the child back and forth in the trough. At first he
screamed, then he was quiet looking at everyone and
breathing very heavily. He soon bled to death and gave up the spirit. The women
Terentjeva and Maximova then carried the body into the woods.
"After the women left, Jossel poured some blood into a bottle and ordered
Koslovskaja to carry it to Slavka
"They had driven out to supervise the women. Jossel stepped down and
inspected the spot where the body had been hidden. The Jews then drove back
into town. Mirka gave both women plenty of wine to drink; Slavka gave them
money and warned them not to tell anyone what they had done, because the Jews
would deny everything and they alone would be the guilty ones.
"Next day, Fratka, the wife of the rabbi Orlik, gave Terentjeva a drink of
brandy, dressed her in Jewish clothes and took her to the school where the same
Jews, along with Koslovaskaja, were present. The little trough containing the
blood were still on the table, and next to it was two
empty bottles. (A third bottle had already been taken to Slavka
This trial went before the Imperial Council at
These are ritual murders which are known and documented. There are a few
reserved to later on in this study, but the question remains: How many have
occurred and nobody today knows about them! How many thousands, yes, perhaps
hundreds of thousands have remained undiscovered! To torture young innocent
human beings, to kill and to drink their blood, this is the greatest and most
terrible guilt amongst all it's crimes, which
International Jewry has taken upon itself.
We could go on and on with case after case for hundreds of pages, but we
believe this should suffice to show that the Jews did and still do sacrifice
Christian children for their ceremonies. In other words, the Jews have a god
which finds blood pleasing. In the words of Mr. Leese, "What sort of a
people is this whose god finds the blood obtained from mutilation
of human genital organs as 'pleasing?'"
Quoting from writer Charles A. Weisman's Book "Who is Esau-Edom?":
"During the Middle Ages Jews were found guilty of ritual murder of
Christians in England; at Norwich in 1146, and Lincoln in 1225; in France at
Blois in 1171; and in northern Italy at Trent in 1475. The Jewish Encyclopedia
lists 121 Ritual Murder cases from 1146 to 1900, which were tried in courts.
Many of the listings show convictions and the mode in which guilty Jews were
executed."
Continuing from "Who is Esau-Edom?":
"From 1900 to 1939's there have been about another twenty cases of ritual
murder by Jews. Even to this day there are reports of ritual murder of
{Christian} children by certain extremist Hasidic Orthodox Jewish
sects."
Continuing from "Who is Esau-Edom?":
"Abortion has become an overt means of child sacrifice which Jews have
instituted under their de facto law. A more covert means of {Christian}
child sacrifice has been by their infamous 'ritual murders, which Jews have
been accused through the ages.' In this practice 'the blood of the sacrificed
gentile {Christian Child} is mixed with flour to make the unleavened bread
eaten at Passover.'"
Even though God commanded circumcision, there is no way a reading of Scripture
shows that God intended that the procedure turn into a bloody ritual. Besides
that, it seems apparent that when Christ nailed the blood ordinances to the
cross, he also nailed the circumcision to the cross. "Behold, I Paul say
unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing."
Make no mistake about it, as we have already stated The
god of the Jews is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel!!! And if it were the same God -- the manner in which the Jews worship is
administered is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord our God. According to
Leese there are two specific periods of time for Ritual Murders by the Jews.
"The two principal feast days associated with Ritual
Murder have been (1) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter at Easter and the
former about one month before it. When a Ritual Murder occurred at Purim, it
was usually that of an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood...the
blood was dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is
possible that the dried blood of a Purim murder might sometimes be used for the
following Passover. When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually
that of a [Christian] child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as
possible, who was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and
crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by
wounding the side in imitation of the murder of Christ. The blood taken from
the child was mixed either in the powdered state or otherwise into the Passover
bread. Then eaten - A type of Jewish Blood ritual was apparently still common
even in 1903, as the Jewish Encyclopedia for that year, in discussing the
method of performing a circumcision, states that the person performing the
ritual: "...takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part
involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the
mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided."
The Jewish circumcision rite requires that this mixture of the mohel's sputum,
wine and blood from his mouth be mixed into a larger batch of wine. From this,
all the Jewish guests drink and celebrate by singing and dancing]
There is little doubt that the Jews and other historians who are possessed by
the spirits of the Jews claim that the "Dark Ages" were from 493 A.D.
to 711 A.D. What they mean by the "Dark Ages" is that the Christian
Church kept the Jews under control and countered their every move to put their Satanic battle plan into motion.
During the "Dark Ages" (the dark ages got its name from the Jews;
because they were driven out of almost every country in Europe at the time, for
their wickedness and ritual murders) they were countered by brave Christian
souls like St. Bernard and others who led forces which confined them to their
own ghettoes where they could not mix their blood with those of our Adamic
people or killed them outright.
Following is quoted from "Mullins' New History of the Jews." In the
One of the problems of the Jewish homeland in
Masaryk was an obscure lawyer when the body of Agnez Hruza was found in
Hilsner's defending counsel at this trial was Jan Masaryk. At the Versailles
Peace Conference, twenty years later, the Jews showed their gratitude by making
a new nation,
In the
The director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, J. Edgar Hoover, annually
conducts a scare campaign warning children in the
The real reason behind
Not only does this cause the American child to be brought up in an atmosphere
of fear and horror, so that it is taught to mistrust all adults, and causes
much neurosis in later life, but it also refuses to face the real issue, the
taste of the Jews for Christian blood.
Some journalists suppose that J. Edgar Hoover performs this annual task, and
many other favors, for the Jews because he is grateful to the Anti-Defamation
League for having ghostwritten a book for him called Masters of Deceit, and for
having peddled hundreds of thousands of copies for him. The book was written by
a Jewish communist name Jay Liebstein, who claims to have shocking personal
information about the Great Deceiver himself. The real reason why
Because the city of
Police officials immediately labeled these killings "sex crimes," as
the Jews had taught them to do. Frantic efforts were made to railroad several
poverty-stricken and ill-educated gentiles to the electric chair, but no
evidence could be manufactured against them which would hold up in court, and
they were released. As in the trial of Christ, the lies of the Jews conflicted
with each other. Although these murders occurred in the heart of a great city,
Not One Clue Has Ever Been Discovered In These Cases! Or rather, we should say
that no clue was ever announced to the public. Although hundreds of police and
detectives worked day and night, due to the public horror over these crimes,
nothing was ever admitted to have been found. There were many charges that
there had been a coverup, and that
Due to this public interest, the
However, there were many strange punctures on the bodies, which could not be
explained. The Daily News published an early afternoon edition in which a
diagram of the Peterson boy's body showed puncture marks in each of the places
where the body of Christ had been wounded on the Stake. Within ten minutes, the
edition had been taken off the newsstands and rushed back to the News building,
where it was burned.
However, eight copies of this issue were obtained by Mrs. Lyrl Clark Van
Hyning, the courageous publisher of a patriotic journal called Women's Voice.
When she called the News office to ask why the edition had been taken off the
stands, she was told that there had been complaints about it, and that it was
likely to cause "racial unrest." During this entire episode, Mrs. Van
Hyning printed the truth about the murders.
Police reports showed that the bodies of the Grimes girls bore puzzling wounds
on their chests, which were to shallow to cause death. Also, no cause of death
could be agreed upon. It was even claimed that they had died of fright! Actually,
as Mrs. Van Hyning pointed out in her paper, they died from a very simple cause, loss of blood, for the News had already published the
strange fact that there was no blood in their bodies, when they were found.
A copy of Arnold Leese's definitive work, Jewish Ritual Murder, was sent to
Arnold Schuessler, father of the murdered boys. He read it, and began to ask
questions of the police. The Jewish Sheriff of Chicago, Lohman, had assigned a
Jewish deputy, Horwitz, to stay with the Schuesslers night and day in case they
raised the question of ritual murder.
When Mr. Schuessler asked Horwitz if his boys had been killed for their blood,
in a Jewish religious ceremony, the Jew immediately accused him of murdering
his own sons! He was taken to police headquarters and given a lie detector
case, which completely cleared him. Instead of releasing him, the Police turned
him over to a Jew named Dr. Steinfeld. He was spirited away to a
"sanitarium" operated by Steinfeld in the nearby town of
An inquest was held, and Dr. Steinfeld was forced to testify. He claimed that
Mr. Schuessler had been suffering from "hallucinations," but he
refused to describe these visions. He also refused to give any further
information, and it was obvious to Dr. Thomas McCarron, the City Coroner of
Chicago, that Steinfeld was concealing the truth. McCarron denounced Steinfeld,
and told the newspapers that the case was very strange. Patients were never
given shock treatments immediately upon being admitted to a sanitarium.
McCarron knew that Schuessler had been murdered, but he could do nothing about
it, and city officials ordered him to say nothing further about the case. For a
few days, there was a very real danger that he too would be murdered. He has
since refused to discuss the case with anyone.
Dr. McCarron knew Steinfeld's sinister history. During World War II, Dr.
Steinfeld had been convicted of giving special drugs to Jewish boys in the
"They (Jews) are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only
perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end and without
ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing, longing and
hoping of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to
deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of
Esther...On how they love the book of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their
bloodthirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope. The sun never did shine
on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they, who imagine to be the
people of God, and who desire to and think they must murder and crush the
heathen. And the foremost undertaking which they expect of their Messiah is
that he should slay and murder the whole world with the sword. As they at first
demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do now, if they only
could; have also tried it often and have been repeatedly struck on their
snouts...Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen; since no
people under the sun always have been, still are, and always will remain more
avaricious than they, as can be noticed in their cursed usury. They also find
comfort with this: "When the Messiah comes, He shall take all the gold and
silver in the world and distribute it among the Jews. Thus, wherever they can
direct Scripture to their insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so. Therefore
know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you
have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement and enemy than a real Jew
who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe
what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their
blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of
poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weszensee
and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full
well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform
it into deeds, in secret or openly. A person who does not know the Devil, might
wonder why they are so at enemity with the Christians above all others; for
which they have no reason, since we only do good to them. They live among us in
our homes, under our protection, use land and highways, market and streets.
Princes and government sit by, snore and have their maws open, let the Jews
take from their purse and chest, steal and rob whatever they will. That is,
they permit themselves and their subjects to be abused and sucked dry and
reduced to beggars with their own money, through the usury of the Jews. For the
Jews, as foreigners, certainly should have nothing from us; and what they have
certainly must be ours. They do not work, do not earn anything from us, neither
do we donate or give it to them. Yet they have our money and goods and are
lords in our land where they are supposed to be in exile! Steinfeld received
$2000 fee for each of these cases. After the war, Steinfeld opened his
sanatarium in
It was ironic that Mr. Schuessler, supposedly being protected by the police,
was murdered in the same place his boys were killed, and his murder, like that
of his sons, went unavenged, except for one later development.
Several patriots went to
A few days later, he flew to
A few weeks later, Arnold Leese, who had been preparing a book about the
Schuessler case as a classic example of Jewish ritual murder, died suddenly.
He had been airmailed copies of all newspaper accounts of the case during the
long investigation, some one hundred pages of newspaper clippings, but these
were not found in his effects after his death. Meanwhile, a Jewish columnist
for The Sun-Times, Irv Kupcinet, whose daughter died a drug addict in a
It is the duty of every American parent whose child disappears to make every
effort to find it. However, many poor families with too many children to feed
take it for granted that a child has gone out into the world to make his own
way, and they are unaware of the probability that the child has been murdered
by the Jews for his blood.
Consequently, no effort is made to investigate these Jewish crimes, despite the
fact that they have been going on for many centuries. It is necessary for us to
use every weapon to arm ourselves against the Jews, and to observe the divinity
of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, in Whose Name Salvation awaits us.
Another horrible involvement of an official American agency in the wide-spread
practice of Jewish ritual murder was hushed up recently. A deputy chief of the
Central Intelligence Agency committed suicide in
He had suffered a fit of remorse over discovering that he had inadvertently
been responsible for the murder of many Christian children in the Jewish
religious ceremonies. This man, a gentile had become known for a special talent
in an agency that was sixty percent Jewish. Most of the Jewish agents traveled
around the world with unlimited expense accounts, staying at the best hotels, a
la James Bond, while they carried out spy missions for
The Christian's special talent was a gift for picking up boys who could be used
as homosexuals for the pleasure of foreign officials. At least, that was what
he had been told, and he saw no reason to suspect otherwise, for the use of
boys in international espionage was an old story, and most governments employed
them at one time or another in order to blackmail high-ranking officials of
other governments.
In the early evening hours, this
During the period from 1947 to 1952, this
In 1963, a Jewish agent in
The Jew ended up by threatening him, saying that if the gentle did not get him
a boy for a ceremony planned for the approaching Passover holiday, he would be
exposed. The gentile went home that evening, and collapsed with a complete
nervous breakdown, from which he never recovered. Some months later, he
committed suicide.
"Moreover, the Beast 666 adviseth that all children
shall be accustomed from infancy to witness every type of sexual act, as also
the process of birth, lest falsehood fog, and mystery stupefy, their minds,
whose error else might thwart and misdirect the growth of their subconscious
system of soul-symbolism. When, where, and with whom ye will.
"The phrase 'with whom' has been practically
covered by the comment 'as ye will.' One need no more than distinguish that the
earlier phrase permits all manner of acts, the latter all possible partners.
"In real life, we have seen in our own times Oscar Wilde, Sir Charles
Dilke, Parness, Canon Aitken and countless others, many of them engaged in
first-rate work for the world, all wasted, because the mob must make believe to
be 'moral.'
"This phrase abolishes the eleventh commandment, 'Not to be found out,' by
authorizing incest, adultery, and pederasty, which every one now practices with
humiliating precaution, which perpetuate the schoolboy's enjoyment of an
escapade, and made shame, slyness, cowardice and hypocrisy the conditions of
success in life.
"The misunderstanding of sex, the ignorant fear like a fog, the ignorant lust like a miasma, these things have done more to keep back
humanity from the realization of itself, and from intelligent cooperation with
its destiny, than any other dozen things put together. The vileness and
falseness of religion itself have been the monsters aborted from the dark womb
of its infernal mystery.
"The anacephalepsis of these considerations is this: 1). The accidents of any act of love, such as its protagonists
and their peculiarities of expression on whatever plane, are totally immaterial
to the magical import of the act.
"Each person is responsible to himself, being a star, to travel in his own
orbit, composed of his own elements, to shine with his own light, with the
color proper to his own nature, to revolve and to rush with his own inherent
motion, and to maintain his own relation with his own galaxy in its own place
in the universe.
"His existence is his sole and sufficient justification for his own matter
and manner. 2). His only possible error is to withdraw himself from this
consciousness of himself as both unique in himself and necessary to the norm of
nature...Whatever your sexual predilections may be, you are free, by the Law of
Thelema, to be the star you are, to go your own way rejoicing. It is not
indicated here in this text, though it is elsewhere implied, that only one
symptom warns that you have mistaken your True Will, and that is, if you should
imagine that in pursuing your way you interfere with that of another star. It
may, therefore, be considered improper, as a general rule, for your sexual
gratification to destroy, deform, or displease any other star. Mutual consent
to the act is the condition thereof. It must, of course, be understood that
such consent is not always explicit. There are cases when seduction or rape may
be emancipation or initiation to another. Such act can only be judged by their
results."
Today for people to really understand the (Jewish) Satanic Philosophy on Jewish
Ritual Human Sacrifice, one should read the following excerpts from Aleister
Crowley's book Magic in Theory and Practice.
"Of the Bloody Sacrifice: and Matters Cognate: It is necessary for us to
consider carefully the problems connected with the bloody sacrifice, for this
question is indeed traditionally important in Magick. Nigh all ancient Magick revolves around this matter. In particular all
the Osirian religions - the rites of the Dying God - refer to this. The slaying
of Osiris and Adonis; the mutilation of Attis; the cults of
"Enough has now been said to show that the bloody sacrifice has from time
immemorial been the most considered part of Magick. The ethics of the thing
appear to have concerned no one; nor, to tell the truth, need they do so. As
"However, there is a mystery concealed in this theory of the bloody
sacrifice which is of great importance to the student, and we therefore make no
further apology. We should not have made even this apology for an apology, had
it not been for the solicitude of a pious young friend of great austerity of
character who insisted that the part of this chapter which now follows - the
part which was originally written - might cause us to be misunderstood. This
must not be.
"The Blood Is The Life: This simple statement is explained by the Hindus
by saying that the blood is the principal vehicle of vital Prana. There is some
ground for the belief that there is a definite substance, not isolated as yet,
whose presence makes all the difference between live and dead matter. We pass
by with deserved contempt the pseudo-scientific experiments of American
charlatans who claim to have established that weight is lost at the moment of
death, and the unsupported statements of alleged clairvoyants that they have
seen the soul issuing like a vapor from the mouth of persons in articulo mortis
but his experiences as an explorer have convinced the Master Therion that meat
loses a notable portion of its nutritive value within a very few minutes after
the death of the animal, and that this loss proceeds with ever-diminishing
rapidity as time goes on. It is further generally conceded that live food, such
as oysters, is the most rapidly assimilable and most concentrated form of
energy. Laboratory experiments in food-values seem to be almost worthless, for
reasons which we cannot here enter into; the general testimony of mankind
appears a safer guide.
"It would be unwise to condemn as irrational the practice of those savages
who tear the heart and liver from an adversary, and devour them while yet warm.
In any case it was the theory of the ancient Magicians, that any living being
is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and health
of the animal, and in quality according to its mental and moral character. At
the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly. The animal should
therefore be killed within the Circle ,
or the Triangle , as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape.
An animal should be selected whose nature accords with that of the ceremony -
thus, by sacrificing a female lamb one would not obtain any appreciate quantity
of the fierce energy useful to a Magician who was invoking Mars.
"In such a case a ram would be more
suitable. And this ram should be virgin - the whole potential of its original
total energy should not have been diminished in any way. For the highest
spiritual working one must accordingly choose the victim which contains the
greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high
intelligence, is the most satisfactory and suitable victim. For evocations it
would be more convenient to place the blood of the victim in the (Jewish)
Triangle - the idea being that the spirit might obtain from the blood this
subtle but physical substance which was the quintessence of its life in such a
manner as to enable it to take on a visible and tangible shape.
"Those magicians who object to the use of blood have endeavored to replace
it with incense. For such a purpose the incense of Abramelin may be burnt in
large quantities. Dittany of
"But the bloody sacrifice, though more dangerous, is more efficacious; and
for nearly all purposes human sacrifice is the best. The truly great Magician
will be able to use his own blood, or possibly that of a disciple, and that
without sacrificing the physical life irrevocably."
In October 1980, P.E. Beasley, a retired Fayetteville, North Carolina police
officer, and Ted Gunderson obtained a signed confession from Helena Stoeckley
who stated that she and members of her (Jewish) satanic cult had murdered Dr.
Jeffrey R. MacDonald's wife and their two children at Fort Bragg, North
Carolina on February 17, 1970. The murders were Stoeckley's initiation into the
group. Stoeckley advised that Dr. MacDonald was the victim of an Army drug
frame up. During the late 1960s and early 1970s drugs were flown into United
States Army bases from
As an outgrowth of the MacDonald investigation Ted Gunderson became involved
with a civilian network in investigating (Jewish) satanic cults. He has
developed extensive information which establishes that a loose-knit (Jewish)
satanic cult/drug network is active in the
We have interviewed numerous adult survivors.
The survivors come from different areas of the country, and none have been in
contact with or know each other. Each of the survivors I have interviewed
furnished me with similar details concerning ceremonies they witnessed in which
humans and animals were sacrificed. Often, the victims were infants or young
children.
Under torture, the body's production of endorphins increases dramatically,
raising the level of Adrenalin and other body chemicals. Occultists torture
their victims to death and cannibalize their bodies just before death in order
to ingest these chemicals, which they believe gives them power. Similarly, some
Satanist eat their victims' brains because they believe
the victim's intelligence will thus pass into their own brain.
Members of the (Jewish - although they are not all Jews, most of them are
however) cult network are operating child day schools throughout the country.
Children from different states who have never met are telling authorities
similar stories concerning their experiences in these schools. There has been
successful prosecution in
The occultists often force preschool children to participate in human
sacrifices and then tell them they and their parent or
parents will be murdered if the children reveal any secrets or talk about these
activities. The psychological effect on the child is that the child believes he or she id guilty of murder. I know of one instance where
a Satanist held a gun to a child's head and told her he would shoot her if she
didn't shoot another child that was tied to a post. She shot the other child.
Sexual molestation of children during their preschool years is part of the
ritual. It is also used to indoctrinate them. Children are indoctrinated
between the ages of 2 and 4, when they are at a critical stage of development.
These children acquire many of their values while under the supervision of
Satanist before being returned to their parents and entering the public school
system.
Satanist convince the children that their parents
don't love them but that they, the Satanist, do. Even after they leave the day
school and enter kindergarten, children's activities are followed by Satanist
and continually reminded that they are being watched. When the children enter
junior high and high school, the Satanist will attempt to actively recruit
them. At this age, youngsters fall easy prey to peer groups who involve them
through music, neighbors, drugs, sex, etc.
Mind control and discipline are an important part of Satanism. The application
of mind control techniques starts during the child's preschool years in day
school and continues through junior high and high school. Games such as
Dungeons and Dragons are used to teach the unaware child (Jewish) satanic
philosophy.
In the McMartin child day school case in
The D.A. dropped the charges on five of the seven. Virginia McMartin was found
not guilty, Raby Buckey was tried twice, with both
trials resulting in a hung jury. The children had stated that they were taken
into tunnels under the school and molested. Some said they were taken out of
the tunnels into the yard of the house next door to the McMartin school, placed in vans, and taken to various places in the
community, where they were used for prostitution. Many prominent citizens were
identified by the children as having been involved, including politicians,
professional athletes and actors.
In May 1990, one of the McMartin victims' parents gained access to the school.
She hired an archeologist. He and his associates found the tunnels at the time
of the second trial of Ray Buckey, but the district attorney refused to use the
evidence in the trial .More than 5000 students attended the McMartin preschool
during the 28 years it was in operation (two schools, 1956 to 1984). We know a
34 year old woman who recalls being sexually molested, along with her
schoolmates, at the McMartin school during her
preschool days, more than 30 years ago.
Many prosecutors are reluctant to prosecute preschool sexual molestation cases
because they believe children cannot be competent witnesses. A three-year study
by Gail S. Goodman, Ph.D., State University of New York at
The findings included: (1) There were not significant
age differences in the children's ability to recall the event, and their recall
did not deteriorate over time. The children's reports were 98% accurate. (2)
The older children (5 to 6 years) answered more objective questions correctly
than the younger ones, (3 to 4 years) and the younger children showed a
decline, after a delay, in their ability to answer questions about the actions
involved. (3) Children did not make up false stories of abuse even when asked
questions that might foster such reports.
It is common for (Jewish) satanic groups to kidnap their victims, usually
infants and young children, from hospitals, orphanages, shopping centers and
off the streets. We have information that Satanist operate
not only child day schools but foster homes as well. This is a source for
children who often cannot be traced. It is also a way of obtaining children for
ritualistic child molestation and recruiting children into Satanism. We have
received information that interment camps are located throughout the
Another source of baby victims are
"breeders," female Satanist whose families have been involved in
Satanism for generations. We have interviewed numerous breeders. The Satanist impregnate the breeders and use the babies for sacrifices.
Since there is no birth record, there is no missing-person report.
The Satanist also use breeders for prostitution and
sexual favors to politicians, law enforcement officers, judges, etc. These
officials are then blackmailed and as a result do not
enforce laws broken by Satanist and often do not prosecute them. Thus, in some
areas, (Jewish) satanic crimes are being overlooked or covered up because
Satanist control law enforcement and the judicial
system.
We have information that a child kidnaping network is active in the
The Satanist prefer to sacrifice Christian infants and
children. The younger the child, the less it has sinned and thus the
"purer" it is deemed to be. There is a preference for pregnant women.
They kill the mother and cannibalize the fetus.
We have information about four individuals who were informants for U.S.
Government intelligence agencies and were involved in the satanic cult/drug
network. By using such individuals, satanic cult/drug informants place
disinformation in government files, thereby influencing in some instances
action taken by government officials. In two cases, the informant worked for
the FBI. This may be one of the reasons the FBI refuses to investigate the
satanic cult movement in the
"The Christians are always singing about the blood. Let us give them
enough of it! Let us cut their throats and drag them over the altar! And let
them drown in their own blood! I dream of the day when the last priest is
strangled on the guts of the last preacher." The satanic network utilizes
specialists for surveillance, photography, contract killings, wiretaps and other
techniques in its efforts to stay continuously aware of the activities of its
adversaries. In 1984, I discovered that my telephones were tapped. I sued GTE
and collected an out-of-court settlement.
Although there are numerous books available on Satanism, most of the teachings
are passed orally from one generation to the next. During a trip to
Several years ago I visited an abandoned satanic ceremony site, located on the
side of a mountain in
The children had also told authorities they witnessed infant sacrifices. I was
reminded of this when I saw a concrete bunker approximately 20' x 20' in size.
A source once active in the satanic movement told me that this type of
structure was where Satanist keep their kidnaped
victims until they sacrificed them. Also at that site I saw two satanic altars
and a small room with steel hooks embedded in the concrete walls. My source
said this was probably a torture room.
We have information that police officers, prosecutors, morticians, ministers,
teachers, doctors, lawyers and others of all ages, in all walks of life, are
practicing Satanist. Many of these individuals lead double lives. To some they
appear as leading citizens of the community, and to their fellow cult members
they are dedicated evil worshipers.
We have been told that a superintendent of schools in
Acquino has top secret clearance and lectures at
A
Mr. Ken Lanning, Superior in Charge of the FBI Behavioral Science Unit,
Quantico, Virginia, states that since there are no bodies, there are no human
sacrifices. He claims Satanism is a religion which is protected by the First
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. He has publicly stated there are more
crimes in the name of Christianity than there are committed in the name of
Satan.
Many local law enforcement agencies recognize this problem and are actively investigating.
However, local law enforcement is not equipped to coordinate this at a national
level. A national clearing house is needed, as well as training and seminars.
The FBI already received monthly crime statistics from every law enforcement
agency in the country. It would be a simple matter for the local law
enforcement agencies to add a column to their report for missing children.
"Prosecution of child molestation cases is being
derailed around the country because young victims are lacing their testimony
with macabre tales of satanic rites, authorities say...But investigators are
curious about similarities they're hearing in such testimony form youngsters in
unrelated and geographically separate cases. 'The main thin in the stories I've
heard is the great consistency in the types of things the kids were reporting -
all across the country the descriptions were very similar.' Gallant said, 'In
the last three years there have been about 60 to 70 solid cases...ones where
investigations were actively pursued.'...
"An 11-year-old Pico Rivers boy, who prompted the arrest of neighbors
after he accused them of molesting him, startled officials with claims the
neighbors forced him to participate in ritual killing. Charges of kidnaping,
conspiracy, false imprisonment and sexual assault of several neighborhood
children were dropped before trial when another child witness recanted
testimony and physical evidence was inconclusive. 'They always said nobody
would believe us if we told,' said the 11-year-old...A professed occultist who
agreed to be interviewed because he said he was a victim of such abuse and
opposes it, confirmed the existence of satanic practices recounted by children.
'Those who worship evil are trying to appease or arise
a spirit or deity, and some believe children are the key to doing this.' said
Damion Jade Blood
And:
"...Says Sandi: 'Too often I hear seasoned police officers say it simply
cannot be true, that some kid must have made up the whole thing, that this just
does not happen in a civilized world.' 'That is precisely what Satanist count
on. They depend on disbelief or fear and ignorance.' The most conservative
estimates place the number of devil worshipers in
An Associated Press release:
"Last year, a psychologist testifying in a 16-year-old boy's trial said
the boy admitted praying to Satan for guidance before shooting his father nine
times 'because he knew God would not help him.' A
From Boston we find:
"South Shore police are considering charges against a group of alleged
devil worshipers after the discovery of their 'church' inside an abandoned
munitions bunker buried deep in the woods at Wompatuck State Park in Hingham.
The bizarre find was made by Cohasset and state environmental police last week
when officers tumbled upon a dozen satanic worshipers dressed in black cloaks
who were seen leaving the bunker. Police confiscated numerous swords, machetes
and knives, an animal skull and a silver chalice, according to John Comeau of
the state Department of Natural Resources...'The whole thing is strange to
me...It's kind of bizarre,' Comeau said yesterday as he sifted through items
seized from the group. 'I think this group was really into it.'"
The Record Searchlight stated:
"A reward of $10,000 is offered for the arrest and conviction of a man who
allegedly abducted a Red Bluff attorney at gunpoint in a child custody case
that may be linked to Satanism and ritualistic abuse.
"'That's the only motive we can see,' Red Bluff police Detective Ted Wiley
said today of the February 2 kidnaping of Cynthia Angeil, 32...The man told Ms.
Angell that she was investigating something that she shouldn't and showed her a
photograph of a baby whose skin had been partially removed, Wiley said. 'It
looked like it could have been an autopsy photo, but the man said it was a
child who had been killed during a Satanic ritual,' Ms. Angell told
police..."
Following is Children's Allegations of Abuse Warrant Examination of Occult
Theology:
"Preschool children in numerous parts of the country have made bizarre and
unusual statements concerning what they allegedly have experienced. As
allegations of child abuse in day care centers emerged, it was clear to me that
the bizarre elements the children described possibly were connected to the
occult. In 1979 I was involved in a child custody case. Due
to the unusual circumstances surrounding this case. I developed an interest
and concern involving the occult. As a result, I began a file on occult
practices and beliefs.
"This article addresses those who attempt to discredit the children by
stating publicly that the bizarre elements in the children's statements lack
credibility. The following information was obtained by researching the occult
and comparing that research to statements made by the children.
"Children in almost all of the cases where ritual abuse is suspected
stated that the adults involved undressed, the children and while of them were
nude, danced in circles. Certainly this allegation is one of the more innocent
in light of other allegations made by the children.
"However, documentation for adults and children dancing together in the
nude is available. For example there is a photograph published in an occult
book giving the explanation that what can be seen in the photograph represents
a dance and spell. In this photograph it is clear there are six adults and one
child. At least three of the adults appear to be female. All are nude and all
are dancing in a circle Children in several cases made the
allegation that they were sexually abused with sticks while being forced to
take part in what appears to be some sort of ritual. When the children were asked
what kind of sticks were used, the majority of the
children responded that the sticks were the kind that come off of trees.
"The children are clear in their descriptions. They are not describing a
kite stick or a yard stick or any kind of finished wood, but rather the type of
stick that would resemble a twig or small branch that is left in its natural
state. In occult practice, the practitioner who is preparing a magic circle for
ritual magic would have a piece of equipment called a wand or rod. The wand or
rod cut from a tree is left in a natural state and is considered to have
supreme magical power. It is also considered to be a phallic
symbol. Several children in one case stated that they were sexually
abused by a perpetrator who had a blue mark on his genitals. Another
independent group of children stated that the perpetrator who sexually abused
them had a red mask on his genitals.
"A Witches Mark (sometimes referred to as the Devil's Mark) can be either
red or blue in color. This mark is placed on the body of the
practitioner, in an area not usually seen, such as under the arm or on the
genitals.
"In some of the other cases the children expressed a fear of the power
they believed was acquired through occultic practice. One of these cases
involved a group of children from the same family. These children felt that
they were being spiritually threatened and asked for something to put in their
rooms that would protect them. Their mother consulted with someone who had some
knowledge of occult theology. The recommendation was to give the children some
salt to sprinkle around the room. The mother felt the children would respond
better to glitter, so she offered them a choice between gold glitter and table
salt to throw around their rooms. The children chose the salt. They took the
salt and carefully sprinkled it around their rooms. The children appeared to
have absolute confidence that the salt would keep them safe.
"Documentation for the use of salt is available in many of the books
written on the occult. It can be purchased in stores that specialize in selling
occult paraphernalia. The purpose of salt is purification. It is also an occult
belief that salt can be used to control devils by keeping them away from a
person or an area.
"In yet another case a parent found an unusual piece of fabric tied in
intricate knots in her home. When she asked her child if she knew what it was
the child became extremely upset and she insisted that it had to be untied
immediately. She became even more upset when she experienced difficulty untying
the knots. Documentation for a Witch's Ladder can be found in several books
written on the occult. The description given for a Witch's Ladder is a piece of
fabric tied in knots and hidden. If the person is intended for does not find
the Witch's Ladder and untie it, the occult belief is that the person will die.
"Not only do the children seem to demonstrate a belief in the more
sinister side of occult theology and appear to have some understanding of the
purpose of some of the occult paraphernalia, but they also appear to be
familiar with some of the occult symbolism. The children draw the well known
symbols of the upside down cross and the numbers 666, but they also draw
symbols a more sophisticated nature. Children from many independent cases have
displayed some knowledge of the symbols described in the Lemegeton, or the
Lesser Key of Solomon as well as those used by Eliphas Levi, a famous Jewish
occult practitioner who lived and wrote many books on the occult in the early
to mid 1800s. "In one particular case the children consistently draw an
equal armed cross and are clear that this particular cross was a symbol used by
the adults during rituals in their case. The equal armed cross of the occult
represents the four elements and cardinal points. Research further reveals that
this cross is also used in ritual magic. In another independent
case, the children consistently draw the shape of a 'T.' They
insist that the 'T' is a cross. This 'T' shape is a pre-Christian cross.
The children in this particular case also are adept at drawing runes. Runes are
known to be used in the occult and date back to the Nordic deities.
"In several other cases the children appear to have been exposed to the
Nazi belief system, or at least the occultic side of the Nazi beliefs. These
children talk of a master race and are familiar with some of the Nazi symbols.
"Adolph Hitler was closely associated with the occultic. Thule Society, and filled many of his key positions with Thule
Society members. The belief of the Thule Society is to establish a super race
of men and to eliminate inferior races. The Thule Society was linked to the
Brotherhood of the Golden Dawn in
"One of the frequent allegations made by the children in the majority of
cases concerns the use of human feces, urine and blood. The children allege
that feces, urine and blood have been smeared on their bodies and that they
have been forced to eat and drink all three body products.
"The use of feces, urine and blood is well documented in most occult
books. All three body products are used in various recipes for any number of
reasons. The purpose of using these body products is the occult belief that
feces, urine and blood retain the power and energy of the person they came
form, which is then transferred to the person who consumes the product.
"Arthur Lyons, who has authored books on the occult and has appeared on
radio and television discussing the subject, writes that one way to celebrate a
black mass is to use water, human urine or menstrual blood and the host or communion
wafer offered during the black mass is to be made of human feces. During the
service the host is either eaten or smeared on the face. The children talk of
experiencing both aspects of this ritual.
"Children in many independent cases where ritual abuse is suspected have
stated that they have witnessed the cooking of babies. If this allegation were
true, what would be the purpose for cooking a baby? Researching books on the
occult, I discovered a recipe for Flying Ointment. This ointment likely produces
the sensation of flight. Flying Ointment is made up of various substances, some
of which are hallucinogenic (deadly nightshade, henbane, aconite &
Belladonna) and then blended with an oil to be rubbed into the practitioner's
skin.
"One oil is suggested in the traditional recipe is baby fat. To my
knowledge the only certain way to obtain baby fat is to cook a baby. Another
element the children have talked about is cannibalism. A reference to
cannibalism can be found in the writings of Arthur Lyons.
"While
"Many children allege they have witnessed the killing of other children or
babies during what appears to be a ritual. There is ample documentation in many
occult books about the need for doing this to acquire the things that a baby's
body would supply to accomplish a particular goal. Flying Ointment is only one
of many goals.
"In 1667 the Marquise de Montespan became interested in Louis XIV of
"
"The foregoing information does however, point to one undeniable fact;
there are people today who will use the body of a dead baby for occultic
purposes. Children in numerous cases across the country have described what
appear to be several different rituals that require the use of both human
and/or animal bones.
"On
"Ceremonial swords and knives, body painting, masks, human body parts,
human and animal sacrifice are just a few of the topics that I discovered
during the course of my research which are documentable as essential to various
occultic rituals. When confronted with statements made by those who choose not
to believe that occult practices involving black magic, black witchcraft,
Satanism or voodoo presently exist and that the only validation that is
available for these practices is historical documentation, I would ask one
question, 'At what point in time did these types of occultic practices stop?'
"Some people stated that they believe the children were exposed to occult
beliefs through Saturday morning cartoons or fairy tales such as Hansel and
Gretel. To my knowledge, there are no fairy tales that teach the kinds of
occultic beliefs of which these children have knowledge. Some of the people who
have the Saturday morning cartoon theory also put forth the theory that the
children were brain washed by their therapists. My repose to that is the
children were disclosing to their parents prior to being taken to a therapist.
What I find unbelievable is that the people who disbelieve are sometimes our
best witnesses. Arthur Lyons claims to be a staunch disbeliever and yet he is
an eye witness to a man who used a dead baby for an occultic purpose, and gives
an account of a lecture on cannibalism where a human leg was eaten. If the
children's statements could not be validated in any way, a reasonable person
would have to disregard what they were saying. But to disregard their
allegations without investigating is unreasonable.
"It has never been my intent to prove or disprove the allegations made by
these children. However, to completely disregard the children's statements or
to label them as fantasy or lies is simplistic and does not give ample
explanation as to how these children acquired the knowledge they possess in
terms of occult beliefs."
Missing: 100,000 Children A Year: The figures are
estimates, but the few known facts are appalling; thousands are murdered
annually; their blood drained in many cases, and shipped all over the world for
Murder Rituals and the number is rising and no one is keeping an accurate
count. Why? Because of the political, economic, and media
control of the most powerful group in the world. "About 8:30 a.m.
on January 7, 1980, Katheleen Mancil drove her daughter Marian Batson to school
in Inverness, Florida. 'See you tonight,' Kathleen
called as the petite, blue-eyed 16-year-old stepped from the car. But she did
not see Marian that night. Or the next. Or the next. No one remembers seeing Marian after she left
her mother's car. The day after her disappearance, her purse was found in a
trash can about 25 miles form the school. She had joined the swelling ranks of
children simply labeled missing.
"Sheila and Katherine Lyon, ages 13 and 11, journeyed to a suburban
shopping center on March 25, 1975, and were never seen again. In early October
1980, two-year-old Brandy Barlow vanished from her front yard. The list goes
on.
"May 25, 1979, Etan walked alone for the first time to his Manhattan
school-bus stop and has not been seen since. Methodical searches with
bloodhounds, helicopters, psychics, and phalanxes of police have failed to turn
up any clues.
"These are not isolated cases. Everyone close to the missing-child problem
agrees that it is a large one - and growing. Statistics, however, are tough to
come by. Boundaries between runaways, parental kidnap victims and children
stolen by strangers tend to blur. The best estimates are that about a million
American youngsters leave home each year, with 90 percent returning in two
weeks. Approximately 100,000 children are thus unaccounted for.
"Add another 25,000 to 100,000 stolen by divorced or separated parents,
and the total becomes significant. 'Kids who just
disappear present a big problem that people had better start opening their eyes
to,' says Det. Sgt. Dick Ruffino of the Bergn County, New Jersey, Sheriff's
Office. Yet no single U.S. agency concerns itself exclusively with missing
children on a national scale. Automobiles, handguns and silverware can be
registered, traced and recovered more easily than children. 'Our priorities are
mixed up,' says Ken Wooden, director of the National Coalition for Children's
justice. 'If someone steals a car, he can be traced and
caught because we have a computer system for tracing stolen cars. But
children apparently aren't that important to us.' Each missing-child case has
its own poignant drama and irony. In July 1976, 12-year-old Dee Scofield
disappeared while running an errand at a Florida shopping center. Two days
later, a classmate reportedly saw Dee looking out a van window, desperately
forming the word 'help' over and over with her lips. Dee Scofield has never
been found. On October 18, 1981, Jimmy Rogers, 14, left his Hanson, Mass., home
for a friend's house. He may have hitched a ride. He has not been seen or heard
from since.
"'Child snatching, kidnaping and the ugly things that happen to these kids
are so horrendous that people refuse to deal with them,' explains Stan Patz,
father of missing Ethan. 'Trying to handle cases like ours on a local level is
a tremendous impediment. We need a centralized, national clearinghouse with
information about which children are missing and how they can be identified.'
"But most cases fall to local police, against whom some parents of missing
children raise a litany of complaints. Because so many children do run away
from home, police label most missing children runaways. And unless the child is
very young or evidence of foul play exists, police commonly will not act on a
missing-child report for 24 hours. The reason: sheer work volume. A surfaced of
violent crimes; most with injured victims and plenty of evidence, takes
priority over the 'maybe' crime of a missing youngster.
"The heart-rending tragedy, of course, occurs when the child is not a
runaway and could possibly have been helped if immediate action had been taken.
On the morning after Christmas 1974, 13-year-old Janna Hanson went to a
friend's house. A short time later, Doreen Hanson drove by to pick up her
daughter; Janna wasn't there. Doreen immediately went to the police, but they
wouldn't search for 24 hours. When police did finally begin an investigation,
it was too late. Janna's body was found after several months, and evidence
indicated she had been murdered on December 26.
"Parents also complain bitterly about the FBI's refusal to help find
missing children. The FBI becomes involved in a missing-child case only when
there's proof of a kidnaping; such as a ransom note, or evidence that the child
was taken across state lines. 'The first-time disappearance of a minor should
be prima facie evidence that a kidnaping has taken place,' says John
Clinkscales, whose son Kyle disappeared six years ago. 'The FBI could then
become immediately involved, and there might be a chance of finding some of
these children. We need help.'
"And answers. Parents always ask the inevitable: Why?
Why would someone steal a child? Why my child? There are many answered, yet no
answers. A million couples a year divorce in the United States, and many of
these cases result in child snatchings. For love, hate, spite or revenge, one
parent steals a child from the other.
"In December 1974, Gloria Yerkovich said goodby to her four-year-old
Joanna as the girl left to spend the weekend with her father. She didn't want
to go, but a court order had said she must. Joanna never returned. The
separation that was to last a weekend has stretched to 7½ years. Despicable as
parental kidnaping is, these children may be more fortunate than others. At
least there's a chance they will go to school, grow up and lead a more or less
normal life. When a stranger steals a child, anything can happen. Parents of
missing children hope that their child will end up in a loving, caring family,
perhaps through black-market adoption. The cruel truth is that a missing child
stands a fair chance of being murdered. Each year an estimated 2500 children in
the United States disappear and later are found murdered (with their blood
drained, in an apparent Ritual Murder case). While the abduction and murder of
a child is a senseless, psychotic act, many children are used for much more
calculated reasons. Says Ken Wooden. 'Kids are
constantly being sought for the lucrative child-prostitution business. Most
police departments and public officials aren't doing anything about it.' If
fear about what may be happening to a missing child is the parents' primary
emotion, frustration is the second. Often, little more is done once local
police exhaust all leads. Teleprinted missing-child reports from one city do
not carry a high priority in another. Verbal descriptions alone are often
useless."
March 19, 1982: Has anyone seen Kevin Collins? Kevin is 10 years old and 4 feet
y inches tall, with brown hair, green eyes and a cheerful disposition. When he
vanished without a trace after basketball practice at St. Agnes School in San
Francisco on February 10, the assumption was that he had been abducted.
September 5, 1982: John David Gosch, vanished from his
paper route on the morning of September 5, 1982, in Des Moines, Iowa.
July 27, 1981: Adam Walsh, six disappeared from a Sears store in Hollywood,
Florida on July 27, 1981; two weeks later his severed head was found in a canal
100 miles away.
May 5, 1982: Two-and-a-half-year-old Russel Mort disappeared on May 5, 1982,
some time between 12:20 p.m., when his mother sent him to play outside their
trailer in a Wheatfild, N.Y., mobile-homes court.
Ritual Murder is still going on today. There is no doubt about it, and the
state and federal government does nothing because most, if not all, the highest
officials in the State and Federal Governments, as well as Congress, the Courts
are up to their neck in this terrible crime against humanity. But nothing is
done because of the economic, political, and absolute control of the national
media by the Jews. Following are some more recent cases.
Robbing The Innocents: "The little girl didn't like
garbage, which is why her mother doesn't believe the story of her death.
Andrea Parsons of Port Salerno, Florida, disappeared on her way home from the
corner store with some candy. Claude Davis, a road worker living across the
street from the Parsons home, claimed that he saw her being forced into a car
by four Hispanic men. Then last month he changed his story: Andrea had been
helping him look for aluminum cans in a Dumpster. She fell, hit her head and
died, he said. Yet no body has turned up, and Andrea's mother Linda doesn't
believe Davis: 'Andrea would rather be founded than take out the trash.' Linda
and the local authorities think somebody made away with her daughter; and with
her life's joy. 'It's like we're stuck in a vacuum, with no beginning and no
ending,' she says.
"If that state of limbo seems grimly familiar, it is because as winter
falls, the country seems seized by a spate of child abductions. The FBI is
investigating nine cases of kidnaping in which homicide is known or suspected.
A stalker haunting the Los Angeles suburb of Van Nuys raped a girl and fondled
about 20 other schoolchildren. In St. Louis, Missouri, two young girls fell prey to a kidnapper-killer, and police have just
arrested a suspect in the would-be abduction of a third. The second girl,
Cassidy Senter, 10, was the object of a massive helicopter-and-roadblock
search. Her body was found in an alley, her head beaten, several fingers
missing, her pants pulled down.
"The public reaction has been outrage. In St. Louis
callers swamped radio talk shows demanding the death penalty and, in one case,
disembowelment for the killer. At the Adam Walsh Center, a
missing-children organization in West Palm Beach, Florida, calls for advice are
up 50%. Its director, Nancy McBride, echoes a popular sentiment: 'Don't let
your children go anywhere alone. Our society is breaking down, and you can't
expect kids to watch themselves anymore.'
"Social scientists, however, advise against hysteria. 'while this kind of
incident is every parent's worst nightmare, like most nightmares it's not
likely to happen,' says Steven Nagler (of course he would say something like
this, because he is a Jew and damn well knows what is happening to most of the
murdered children - that they are being used in a Jewish Ritual Murder orgy) of
the Yale Child Studies Center. Adds Ernie Allen,
president of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC):
'There are going to be outrageous acts that even the most cautious of families
will not be able to prevent.'
"The specialists stress two things: there is little protection against
kidnapper-murderers, but fortunately thee are few of them. The vast majority
(several hundred thousand a year) of child snatchings are perpetrated by family
members in custody disputes. According to the well-respected 1990 Justice
Department report National Incidence Studies on Missing, Abducted and
Thrown-Away Children in America, far fewer; 3200 to 4600 minors (see the lies
told about the number of murdered and tortured children) a year, are seized by
strangers. Most victims are teenagers; contrary to media coverage, a
disproportionate number are black or Hispanic. Only 300 of the abductions are
classic kidnaping involving overnight captivity, transport of more than 50
miles, and ransom or murder. The number of kidnap-murders has fluctuated
between 50 and 150 a year for at least 17 years. Allen estimates that 1993 will
be on the low end."
Members of Satanic Cult 'Gave Children Away': Tallahassee, Florida (UPI).
"Police said six filthy and confused young children, taken from two men
charged with child abuse, had been given away by their parents says part of a
satanic cult ritual member.
"Authorities in Tallahassee and Washington were trying today to learn the
identities of the six children, locate their parents and learn more about an
unidentified 'satanic cult' apparently based in Washington.
"Meanwhile, two men who identified themselves as Michael Houlihan and Doug
Ammerman; names police believe are phony, were being held in lieu of $100,000
bond on child abuse charges. The men were arrested in a city park Wednesday
after someone called police about two well-dressed men in a blue van watching
over six 'filthy' children.
"'It is our belief these kids were not kidnaped, but that their parents
gave them away because one of the rites of passage into this satanic
organization is that you have to give up your rights to your children, and that
the leaders of this organization can do what they want to with your children,'
police spokesman Scott Hung said Friday. 'I believe
what you're going to find when this all shakes down is that the kids' parents
belong to this organization.' Until we can figure out where everything is, we
can't say a whole lot,' said Walt Ferguson, a police spokesman in Washington.'
"The Washington Post reported today that the U.S. Customs Service is
helping with the investigation and that pictures found at a Washington, D.C.,
warehouse linked to the group include those of children engaged in what
appeared to be 'cult rituals.' The newspaper said; 'the group was known as The
Finders and was made up of about 40 people who lived in the District of
Columbia and a farm in rural Virginia, the remains of a popular 1960s hippie
refuge that evolved into a Satanist society.' Hunt said a
6-year-old girl in the group showed signs of sexual abuse. The children; four
boys and two girls ranging in age from 2 to 6, were put in state custody."
The story does not end here, it will continue until Christian Americans become
enraged and act to stop these terrible crimes. However, most non-Jews who aid
the Jews in committing ritual murders, covering up for them in police
departments, on newspapers and in government offices, are not so squeamish. It has
been estimated that at least one-third of all officeholders in the United
States are well aware of the prevalence of Jewish ritual murder of children,
and that their continuing to hold office depends on aiding and abetting the
Jews in the practice of these crimes.
During a conversation with Father Bulger in 1956, he related that he had been
working all his life on a book which was to be the definitive work on Jewish
ritual murder. Father Bulger furnished much of the information contained
herein. However his superiors had forbidden him to have his own book published.
In former years, most of the information about this type of crime had been
published in Catholic encyclopedias and official parochial works, but further
writings on the subject of Jewish ritual murder had been banned because of
Jewish pressure on the Vatican.
Father Bulger said that according to his estimates, six million gentile
children had been done to death in the ritual manner by Jews since the
crucifixion of Christ. These six million victims have not only gone unavenged,
but each one of them, deserving to be elevated to sainthood for their
sufferings at the hands of the Jews, has died without gentile society making
the slightest effort to protect other children from becoming victims in the
same manner.
Father James E. Bulger said,
"The blood lust of the Jews and their hatred of Jesus Christ are combined
in this horrible ceremony."
Not only have millions innocent souls been done to death in ritual murder by
the Jews, but each of us must ask himself, What kind of Christian, what kind of
human being, am I, if I do nothing to protect children from such horrible
sacrifice in a supposedly Christian and modern society?
Allusions To Blood Libel Made By Prominent Italian Newspaper: Rome, June
20 (JTA)--A newspaper article that appeared to link the unsolved murder of an
Italian child last year with ancient blood libel slander against the Jews has
prompted concern among Italian Jewish leaders.
The article, which appeared May 30 in a provincial edition of the Rome daily Il
Messaggero, drew parallels between the murder of 4-year-old Simone Allegretti,
near the central Italian town of Foligno, and two ritual murder cases in
15th-century Italy.
The article theorized that Simone's murderer was a mentally unbalanced person
who, knowing the ritual murder stories, may have committed a sort of copycat
crime.
But, as Tullia Zevi, the president of the Italian Union of Jewish Communities,
pointed out in a June 8 letter to the editor of Il Messaggero, the article's
conclusions were so ambiguous that they could be "potentially
dangerous."
The Messaggero article was headlined: "From History, Chilling Similarities
with the Murder of Simone." A subhead read: "Monster of Foligno, the
Hypothesis of Ritual Murder." The article mentioned the 15th-century cases
of Simon of Trent, in northern Italy, and Antonuccio of Bevagna, a town near
Foligno, in Umbria. "The first (victim), later beatified, was kidnaped the
evening of Good Friday and died drained of blood during a macabre rite,"
the article declared. "The other, instead, is said to have been seized and
wounded," the newspaper said.
The blood libel, or accusation that Jews murdered Christian children and
drained their blood for use in ritual, particularly in making matzot for
Passover, dates back to medieval times and has been one of the most persistent
and irrational anti-Semitic superstitions over the centuries. The accusations
have sparked mass persecutions, anti-Semitic hysteria and other horrors, down
into this century. Perhaps for this reason, the Jewish community here has been
quick to respond to any apparent attempt to revive or lend credence to this
superstition.
The Messaggero article, by Gilberto Scalabrini, described in detail the story
of Simon of Trent, a 2-year-old who was found horribly murdered on Easter
Sunday 1475. "How was Simon of Trent killed? To reread this story gives
one goose pimples, because the details have a terrible resemblance to the fate
of the little boy from (Foligno)," he wrote. But while he noted the
"popular superstition of the time" and described the Jews who were
executed for the murder as "presumed criminals," he went on to gave a
blow-by-blow description of the crime, citing "documents" detailing how
the Jews of Trent, supposedly in the synagogue itself, carried out the murder.
He then quotes a Jewish historian as recounting the case of Antonuccio of
Bevagna, in 1485, in which a child accused a family of local Jewish bankers of
kidnaping him and trying to drain his blood. That story, however, appeared to
have been linked to attempts at the time to close down the Jewish bank. The
case was dismissed. "Surely they do not have any precise analogy to the
murder of Simone Allegretti," Scalabrini wrote. "But 'a sick mind"
could have read them and codified them in order to commit a ritual murder.
"The blood of Simone, in fact, was never found, even though he lost about
3 liters," the reporter wrote.
Kielce's pogrom: The last blood libel in Poland: Today marks the 50th
anniversary of the infamous pogrom in the Polish city of Kielce. The pogrom, in
which thousands of ordinary people took to the streets and massacred their
neighbors on the charge that the latter were guilty of ritual murder, was a
result of a blood-libel accusation against the Jews. The pogrom's anniversary
is by and large ignored in Poland. Ritual murder charges against Jews are a
frequent occurrence in Polish history. The first anti-Jewish pogrom caused by
ritual murder accusations after Poland's liberation from the Nazis occurred in
August 1945. Leaflets on the streets of Cracow proclaimed: "The Jews are
our eternal enemies. They kill our children in their synagogues."
Responding to such propaganda, a Polish mob attacked the synagogue on Miodowa
Street during the Shabbat service. The synagogue was set on fire and the Torah
scrolls desecrated. The riots spread to Sosnowiec and Lublin. The number of
victims is not known as the riots were never officially reported.
But the Kielce pogrom was the worst consequence of blood-libel charges. A
nine-year-old Christian boy, Henryk Blaszczyk, the son of a local laborer,
disappeared from home. For two days he stayed with relatives in a nearby
village, but when the boy came back and was asked where he had been, he said
that he was kidnaped by Jews and kept in a cellar where he saw 15 other
Christian children already murdered. It was, he said, at the house on 7 Planty
Street.
Among the occupants of this house was the Kielce Jewish Committee, a group of
young Jews who were getting ready to leave Poland for Palestine, survivors of
the Nazi camps and some returnees from the Soviet Union.
As soon as the story became known among the local population, crowds began to
gather around the building. Before the police had time to consider what action
to take, the crowd had grown to several thousand. In a wild fury some broke
into the building and any Jew they were able to drag outside was beaten or
trampled to death. Some of the victims were thrown out of the windows.
A unit of the internal security forces sent to the scene of the pogrom joined
the killers. The attackers received further assistance from a group of miners.
The carnage was only stopped late in the afternoon when a large army unit
arrived from Warsaw. But even when the wounded were being taken to hospital,
the open wagons in which they were transported became the target for
stone-throwers. According to some estimates, half the Kielce population of
50,000 took part in this, a pogrom reminiscent of the Dark Ages.
While the carnage was taking place on Planty Street, other parts of the town
and its surroundings were the scene of more murders. Jewish passengers on
trains arriving at Kielce were murdered. Altogether the pogrom resulted in 42
deaths and more than 80 injured.
Representatives of the government, the Central Jewish Committee, and the
foreign press were present at the funerals. While the caskets with the bodies
of the victims were lowered into the ground, a Polish professor named Gorecki
expressed his sorrow. After beating his breast several times he cried out:
"Polish Christians, our hands are stained with the blood of innocent Jews.
We are all responsible for this crime. Never, never must we
forget. The burden of this crime will weigh forever on our
conscience."
The Catholic Church officially refrained from commenting. A letter read in
churches after the pogrom failed to condemn the violence, but rather obscured
the issue of Polish antisemitism. The archbishop of Kielce refused to condemn
the pogrom. And the archbishop of Lublin, who later became a cardinal, had this
to say on blood libels: "During the trial of Beilis [in Tsarist Russia]
many Jewish scriptures were submitted to deny the practice of using Christian
blood for ritual purposes, but there was no proof that it wasn't practiced."
An exception was the archbishop of Chestochowa, who had the courage to condemn
not only the violence but the accusations of ritual murder. It was only in 1981
that an article in Tygodnik Solidarnosci by Prof. Krystyna Kersten broke the
silence on the Kielce pogrom. Further investigation to find out who was behind
the pogrom was undertaken by Jerzy Slawomir in 1986.
In 1990, Gazeta Wyborcza a leading Warsaw daily published an extensive analysis
of the events in Kielce entitled "Kill a Jew." Since then, the
anniversary of the Kielce pogrom has received only a passing mention in the
Polish press. What is significant about all the published material in Poland
regarding the pogrom is the variety of theories on the identity of the instigators. Among the suspects are the Communists, the
Polish underground, the Polish government in exile, the Zionists and finally
the Jews themselves.
The former head of the province of Wislicz said in 1986:
"Today I would like to forget about [the pogrom], but if you insist on
going back 40 years...I can consider that the Jews themselves are partly
responsible."
Not one Polish historian has investigated the antisemitism that caused the
pogrom. Until recently, any public admission of Poland's guilt was met by a
hostile reaction from those Poles who considered such admissions as denigrating
the honor of the Polish nation.
In 1990, on the 44th anniversary of the pogrom, a commemorative plaque for the
victims of the pogrom was unveiled on the initiative of then- president Lech
Walesa. On the day prior to the unveiling, the victims' graves in the Kielce
cemetery were desecrated, and during the night the plaque was defaced. There
were also numerous, albeit feeble, attempts by some Polish personalities and by
members of the Catholic clergy to express regret for past behavior. And the
Catholic Church, which historically has been responsible for so much Polish
antisemitism, has been quite active in trying to change the attitudes of the
Polish masses toward Jews.
A letter of the Polish Episcopate, read in all Polish churches on January 21,
1981, contained expressions of regret "for all acts of antisemitism which
have taken place on Polish soil at any time and by anyone." The letter
also begs for forgiveness for the Church's position during the Nazi occupation
of Poland.
Baby-smuggling accusation causes blood libel to surface: The blood-libel myth
surfaced in Romania after police there held an Israeli and three Romanians
accused of smuggling babies to Moldova and Israel, police said last week. A
Romanian police spokesman identified the Israeli citizen as Mahmud Asadi, a
Palestinian who converted to Judaism and claims to have been a personal
secretary to slain Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, according to the World
Jewish Congress.
Resurrecting the centuries-old anti-Semitic blood libel, the Bucharest weekly
Baricada reported last month that there was no chance of ever seeing the
smuggled children alive because "as is well-known, Jewish matzah demands
kosher, young Christian blood."
But involved in "collecting kosher
blood" is protected by the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, it is
"unlikely" that proof of the horrible deed can be produced, the
weekly said.
The day they stopped believing : The Ethiopian
immigrants came to Israel all wrapped up in a package deal. The rabbinate
agreed to their coming in exchange for the letting of a drop of blood from the
sexual organ of each adult male (a confirmation of their Jewishness, which
incidentally has still not been fully recognized); and with the proviso that
their children would attend religious schools. The Ethiopians agreed.
Most of them underwent the bloodletting ritual, a physically, spiritually and
collectively humiliating business, and their children go to state religious
schools. They were told it was for their own good, and they believed it.
They were all, in a bundle, placed in absorption centers, and the children were
put into absorption classes. They were told it was for the sake of their
advancement and their integration, and they really wanted to believe it.
All of them were given blood tests, and it was explained to anyone who enquired
that "they" had many contagious diseases. They were given preventive
pills en masse, which caused horrendous stomachaches. These they suffered
stoically - or threw away the pills secretly - and didn't understand why
Israelis were being warned not to come near them for six months.
Their rabbis were dispatched like a pack of fools to a course at the
"real" rabbinate given by Israeli rabbis, and the children were sent
away to religious boarding schools. They were told that this would make them
equal in the eyes of "kosher" Israeli Jews, and that their children
would have an equal opportunity to go on to higher education.
And if their kesim hadn't been barred from the rabbinate, and if most of their
children hadn't failed their bagrut, they might almost have believed it. And
then they were all branded with the mark of AIDS, and it was even explained to
them that it had nothing to do with racism.
And then, like Ahad Ha'am's Jews faced with blood-libel, they couldn' t believe any longer. This latest blood-libel was
the straw that broke the camel's back.
Had there been some differentiation made, for example, between Ethiopians who
came here in the '80s and those who came in the '90s; or between the young
generation (which tends to have an active sex life) and older people (who are
generally less sexually active) the immigrants might have played along. They
might have kept quiet had they been told openly that they couldn't donate their
blood and been given a reason, valid or not. That they might well have
accepted. But they found themselves treated like some blighted, primitive
group, like a bunch of lepers, and that even the Ethiopians couldn't take.
What the authorities are not saying is that they were only trying to preserve
the Ethiopian immigrants' sense of honor - but the immigrants have stopped
believing either the facts as presented, or in the authorities' good
intentions. So have I. "There's an optical illusion here
about the proportion of HIV carriers among Ethiopian immigrants," said Dr.
Ronny Shtarkshall, of the Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Public Health
and Community Medicine in a Ma'ariv interview two years ago, during the
previous wave of rumors. "There has been no general check for HIV
carriers among the Israeli population." The estimate is 3,000, but the
real figure cannot be known. "And in any case," the doctor said,
"the incidence of AIDS among Ethiopian Jews is far lower than in Western
countries like the US, Switzerland and France. This is chiefly because sexual
promiscuity and homosexuality, the most frequent causes of HIV transmission,
simply don't exist."
Shtarkshall remarked that he would be more wary of Israelis who had backpacked
abroad and come into contact with people they didn't know than Jews from
Ethiopia. But this stand, explicit as it was, didn't prevent the reporter from
continuing to treat AIDS among Ethiopian immigrants as an established fact.
The doctor then went into great detail in the interview about a Joint
Distribution Committee-funded project he was involved in to educate the
Ethiopians about AIDS. For a project of this type you need a severe
social or medical problem. And now the doctor had a problem - he seemed to be
contradicting himself. Is there or isn't there a huge risk, above
the average, of AIDS in the Ethiopian community here?
I have a theory: There are various interested parties here, and all of them
want to preserve the Ethiopians as a mass to be manipulated, concentrated in
absorption centers (which need a reason to go on receiving funds for existing),
and dominated. Once it has been "established" that the Ethiopians as
a community pose an AIDS danger, they can be smeared with mud, tricked, their
children isolated, and their blood tossed into the garbage bucket. For long
years to come, the Ethiopians will go on filling a mystical, much-needed role
for researchers, absorption organizations, and the media.
The Day Yeltsin Praised the Art of Blood Libel: Russian Prexy Tours.
Retrospective of Ilya Glazunov and Finds It "Patriotic": Moscow --
For Boris Yeltsin, paintings filled with caricatures of long-nosed Chasidic
Jews bearing gold coins and drinking chalices of Russian blood while ape-like
black men abscond with naked white women are "optimistic and
patriotic."
At least that's the impression the Russian president gave as he toured the vast
retrospective exhibition of the nationalist painter Ilya Glazunov. Mr. Yeltsin
listened raptly as the artist explained his massive tableaux, which fault
communists, Jewish devils, blacks and foreign opportunists for all of
Mr. Yeltsin's appearance at the show, which drew thousands of eager Muscovites,
suggests that radical nationalism, once the province of fringe extremists, is
being openly espoused even by the country's president. In the past six months
since the surprise parliamentary victory of neo-nationalist Vladimir
Zhirinovsky, Yeltsin reformers, most visibly Foreign Minister Kozyrev, have
been quick to take more strident positions, particularly defending Russian
interests abroad and the cause of ethnic Russians living in former Soviet
republics. With 150 extreme-nationalist publications now circulating widely in
Mr. Yeltsin's visit to the Glazunov exhibit marks the first time that Mr.
Yeltsin has acted in a way that could be construed as endorsing anti-Semitism.
Yet the significance of the visit may lie in the fact that he, too, sees a need
to court the nationalist vote and is not above resorting to sycophantic
gestures to get it. "Almost every painting shows that out of dreadful
human torments, battles and killings, a new
At a time when many Russians are feeling humiliated over the country's
infrastructural breakdown, moral chaos and loss of diplomatic influence abroad,
paintings that pay homage to the country's past greatness are certain to be popular.
In particular, Mr. Glazunov's monumental canvases present a
panoply of Russian mythical, historical, royal and religious figures,
including great Russian writers, artists, politicians and saints. As one
gallery-goer, a 60-year old grandmother named Natalia Aluyeva, observed:
"We have lost our illusions of a future happy society and are
seeking consolation in our history."
Sanctions Violence: The paintings' darker sides, however, brimming with
sinister allusions to devils, masons and so-called
cabalistic symbols, raise the troubling question: At what point has the artist
crossed the line where patriotism ends and is replaced by a rabid nationalism
that sanctions violence against ethnic minorities. "The Grand Experiment
(1990)," a behemoth tableau that focuses on Russian history in the 20th
century, is a case in point.
In the Glazunov iconography,
Caricature of Trotsky: In the center of the canvas, a red five-pointed star; a
reference both to the communist star and the "Masonic" star; frames
the enormous head of Karl Marx, the Jew who within the painting clearly is to
blame for all the bloodshed of "the Grand Experiment," namely communism.
In front of Marx's face is a tetragram that the exhibition catalogue describes
as "the five-pointer star, ancient cabalistic symbol -- the symbol of
evil. Marxism is connected to Satanism." To the left of the red star,
there is a tomato-red caricature of Trotsky, depicted as a long-nosed Jewish
devil with black claws, scaling the Kremlin walls. Below him, Mr. Glazunov
invokes the blood libel, painting in a thick-bearded Chasid sipping a cup of
Russian blood. There is yet another long-nosed Chasid with gold coins in one
outstretched hand and, under his other arm, Russia stamped with the Soviet
hammer and sickle; nearby, a smiling black man makes off with a bare-breasted
white woman who is for sale for two dollars; Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt
are there with the Israeli flag hanging behind them.
Although the painting is complicated, crammed with several hundred historical
faces, the message is clear: Outsiders, among them Jews in particular, are
responsible for the revolution that destroyed the paradisiacal period of
Christian tsarism, bringing waves of bloodshed on the Russian people. Those
outsiders are also seen as clearly to blame for the current invasion of
Appeal to Fascists: The Glazunov exhibition appeals particularly to radical
nationalists and fascists, who propagate the idea of a foreign conspiracy out
to destroy
The fact that such an openly racist exhibition was attended and praised by the
country's president indicates the current political sway of the ethnic Russian
idea and the political impotence of minorities in
A spokesman for Mr. Yeltsin insisted that the stroll around the exhibit was
innocent: "He is interested in painting and is especially interested in
the reaction of the public to this exhibit," remarked Anatoly Krasikov,
Mr. Yeltsin's press spokesman. "[Mr.] Yeltsin, like any other democratic
president, can afford to go to art exhibits without taking political
sides."
The exhibit at Moscow's Manezh central exhibition hall, however, was sponsored
by several state agencies, including the Mayoralty of Moscow, the Russian
Ministry of Culture and the state's Academy of Russian Painting and
Architecture; which is headed by Mr. Glazunov. The painter has been using the
show as a weekly soapbox, preaching his ideas -- about politics, not art -- to
an eager public. "This is a chance to express the feelings of Russian
people through art in ways that ordinary simple people can understand,"
commented Raisa Ivanova, a Muscovite straining in the crowd to hear Mr.
Glazunov speak. "He is a very great, nationalistic painter with emotional
impact. This is a patriotic exhibit. He loves his motherland and he is showing
us how our soul is sick."
Following
Meanwhile, Jews have never been more interested in
Sanz-Briz, who worked at the Spanish Embassy in
It is at the very least ironic that
Not that
That ethnic cleansing happened years ago, so you don' t
find the collective guilt that characterizes
Consider the experience of Trudi Alexy, a Prague-born Jew who fled with her
family to
Some of the most fascinating passages in Ms. Alexy's book concern her
encounters with Marranos, who are outwardly Catholic but practice some form of
Judaism at home. More are turning up all the time; most recently in Puerto
Rico, and those who have sought to integrate with the Jewish community
have encountered all sorts of difficulties in asserting their Jewishness, as
one who tried to become a rabbi poignantly recounted to Ms. Alexy. But most
don't want to. An American Jewish doctor told Ms. Alexy of his experience
visiting an Andalusian colleague almost 50 years after they had worked together
during the Spanish Civil War. Citing his friend's surname; which
sounded Jewish, the American asked the Spaniard
if he had Jewish ancestors. "We are as Catholic as Catholic can be,"
the Spaniard replied. Then he led his guest to a dark, windowless room.
"Whenever I am troubled or need help, I pray to the Virgin Mary or to Our
Savior Jesus Christ or to the saints. I say the rosary and go to Mass,"
he said. "But if all else fails, I come here." He opened
a door with an old key and removed an ancient tallis and a set of phylacteries.
Then he prayed.
Like the phylacteries, most things Jewish in
Of the five synagogues that served
In 1410, my guide recounted, a Jewish doctor loaned a priest
money -- in return for a holy wafer, which he intended to desecrate in a vat of
boiling water. But the wafer didn't boil. Instead, the building caught fire,
and the wafer, emitting blood, sailed across town into the hands of a priest. A
crack behind the altar, supposedly made by the ricocheting wafer, has proved
impossible to repair, the guide pointed out. "It' s
only a legend," she said. "But I believe it because it's pretty. "
The infamous blood libel story -- pretty? She
grew up with the story. It's depicted on a 19th-century painting right there in
the church -- wafer gleaming in mid-air, terrified Jews scurrying in all
directions. A few years ago, a friend told me about a "Jewish" family
living in
Upon questioning, my host's son explained that the flag was "left over
from my brother's youth." So was evidence of other phases the boy passed
through: buttons of hammer and sickle, marijuana leaves, Mickey Mouse.
Dalliance with fascism was just one of those post-Franco adolescent attempts to
be as offensive as possible. "Frankly, until recently, I didn't know the
swastika had anything to do with the Jews, " he
added. This ignorance, willful or not, is rooted in the same mind-set that
finds the blood libel believable. Judaism is appealing to Spaniards because it
is ancient and arcane, not because it is a living culture. The folkloristic
conception of "the Jew" has nothing to do with contemporary Jews or
Judaism, with which the vast majority of Spaniards have no contact.
About 12,000 Jews live in
The hatred of Jews, stands a great hatred on the part
of the Jews for all Gentiles. There is nothing so
profound within me as the conviction that, if anything exists which unites all
Jews of the world, it is the great, sublime hate. No one can deny the fact that
a powerful Jewry is a danger to all Gentiles. All attempts by certain Jewish
circles to prove the opposite must be pointed out to be just as cowardly as
they are comical.
The charges are almost always identical: Christian Arabs in the
The most recent example of such propaganda, penned by William Dalrymple,
appeared in the
First, a monk (Fr. Alexandros), whom Dalrymple meets in
Dalrymple then allows that Fr. Alexandros is, like many hermits, "deeply
eccentric," but the cleric's story, he says, checked out. "At the
Greek Orthodox patriarchate in the Old City I was shown a file full of reports
and correspondence about the desecration of the cave of St. Chariton and the
violent murder of Fr. Philloumenous; I was even directed to the Martyrion at
the Orthodox seminary on Mount Zion where Philloumenous's shattered skull and
cleaved bones lay on permanent display awaiting potential
canonization...Checking the incident in the more sober archives of the
Jerusalem Post," Dalrymple continues, "I found that during the same
period two Jerusalem churches and one Christian bookshop had been burned to the
ground by ultra-orthodox Jewish fanatics, while students from a nearby yeshiva
had committed serious vandalism at the Dormition abbey. There had also been a
series of unsuccessful arson attacks on the Anglican church
in
Even the most indifferent reader would be shocked by such horrors. Only savages
murder monks and nuns, desecrate holy places and threaten innocent men of the
cloth. "The Jews" and "settlers" of the story are indeed
despicable.
There is little resemblance, however, between Dalrymple's story and the facts.
There is no record of a Fr. Alexandros in
The monk Philloumenous was indeed murdered, not by a fanatic
"settler" (the current euphemism for villain), but by a deranged,
newly religious Green Line Israeli who also killed a Tel Aviv abortionist and a
Ramle fortune-teller, both Jewish, in the name of God. He is now in a mental
institution.
There were two cases of arson, in 1973 and 1974, in which Jews, members of the
Jewish Defense League (later the Kach movement), were implicated. The attacks
were aimed at alleged missionary activity. Furniture and books were damaged,
but nothing was burned to the ground.
Ten JDL members, mostly teenagers, were arrested. At least two served time. In
apparent retaliation, a Jewish religious bookshop was torched.
In 1982, the chapel of a Jerusalem Baptist church was burned to the ground. This time neither the JDL nor any other Jewish organization claimed
responsibility.
The Jerusalem Post reported that: "Police said last night it was possible
the chapel was burned by extremist Jews. However they did not rule out the
possibility that a Moslem or a Christian arsonist started the flare to spoil
relations between faiths in
The most striking aspect of these occurrences was the Israeli reaction. Not
only did the government and municipal authorities immediately pay for damage
not covered by insurance; large sums from individuals and organizations poured
into special bank accounts opened for donations. The Jerusalem Rotary, for
example, made a substantial contribution.
The prime minister, mayor, chief rabbis and cabinet ministers all condemned the
acts in the most outspoken terms. The 1982 arson was called by then-premier
Menachem Begin "a malicious crime." Arab Baptists from
To state that Dalrymple's article amounts to a blood libel is to be charitable.
Blood libels in the Middle Ages were usually propagated by ignorant, fearful
people. Dalrymple knew the truth: He himself states that he used the Post's
archives as his source.
Nor is it surprising that the article was published in The Spectator. This is
the weekly which recently ran an article about Hollywood Jews which, as
Jerusalem Post reporter Tom Tugend put it (November 14), "revives the
well-known stereotype of a 'cabal' of vulgar, clannish Jews dominating the
American entertainment industry." Nor should it be too surprising that the
editor of this would-be neo-Nazi publication is Dominic Lawson, a Jew.
Genocide Charged: Charges made by the Israeli media and confirmed by a former
Israeli immigration inspector indicate that "hundreds, perhaps
thousands" of children of Sephardic Jews were taken from their parents (By
Askenazi Jews) and never returned. Sephardic Jews live in the
The Tel Aviv daily newspaper was told by the former inspector Ami Hovev that a
"substantial number" of these children were killed in medical
experiments and buried in lime pits. "I know that (Israeli physicians in
state hospitals) conducted experiments on living children, extracting
phosphorus and bone marrow from the spinal chord," Hovev told Israeli TV.
The parents were told that immigration regulations required underage children
from the East to be hospitalized at entry. Families later received
"notification" that their child had died in the hospital.
Subject:
To all the Brainwashed & Brain-dead
White Race jew-day-o's, are these the jew gods you worship???
Date:
Wed, 25 Dec 2002 16:12:13 -0800
From:
"Bob Jones"
<dragonslayer@lvcm.com>
To:
"dragonslayer"
<dragonslayer@lvcm.com>
Jewish Gangsters Raped, Killed Children As Young As
Two On Film
LSN: Oct. 9 2000
Italian, Russian Police Break Up Child Snuff Porn Ring
Rome, Italy -- Italian and Russian police, working together, broke up a ring of
Jewish gangsters who had been involved in the manufacture of child rape and
snuff pornography.
Three Jews from
Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story up,
but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes from the films
live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11 million Italian
viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives responsible, claiming they
were spreading "blood libel."
Throughout history, various groups have accused sects of Jews of ritually
murdering small children. One such account, that of
Hugh of Lincoln, led to the expulsion of all Jews from
Though AP and Reuters both ran stories on the episode, US media conglomerates
refused to carry the story on television news, again saying the story would
prejudice Americans against Jews.
Jewish gangsters in
prostitutes through
recent report in the Jerusalem Post.
Libertarian Socialist News
Post Office
libertariansocialist.com
Those kidnapped children who were not used for medical experiments were given
to European families to raise, because of their low birth rate.
Such is the blood lust of the Jews!
"Some people, once they adopt an idea, bury it in the ground
and go on the rest of their lives defending it, without ever
re-examining it to see whether time and the elements have
caused it to decay into a worthless handful of dust. In that
way you can be always consistent; and often wrong." (Raymond
Clapper)