By
Arnold Leese.
PALESTINE is a country about the size of Wales. Its
population before it was singled out to be a National Home for the Jews, in
round figures, consisted of:—
Muslim Arabs, 500,000.
Christian Arabs, 63,000.
Jews, 65,000.
The number of Jews is now (1938) over 400,000.
THE BASIC LIE BEHIND
THE JEWISH CLAIM TO
PALESTINE.
By means of constant propaganda the Jews have
induced the Gentile peoples to believe that the Jews have some moral right to
occupy Palestine.
No such moral right exists.
The Jews crept into Palestine by stealth; for only
about 350 years in the whole history of the country was it under Jewish
control; and the Jews lost it by conquest. Since the Romans came to control the
country in A.D. 70, the Jews have never ruled Palestine in any form. They
actually have no historical claim to the country at all. They have generally
been an absolute nuisance to it.
The Christians have a far better moral claim to
Palestine, for there their religion was founded by a Galilean. They have always
called it “The Holy Land” and have waged several Crusades to regain it from the
Mohammedans, and in these wars thousands of Christians lost their lives. The
Founder of their religion was done to death there by the Jews.
There is another point. The Jews who have immigrated
into Palestine since the “National Home” was attempted have been chiefly Ashkenazim
Jews; these are the Jews from eastern Europe; unlike the Sephardim Jews
who are mainly congregated in the countries around the Mediterranean Sea, these
Ashkenazim Jews are the descendants, not of Jews who were ever domiciled
in Palestine, but of inhabitants of the Khazar Empire in Southern Russia, which
flourished from the 7th to the 10th century; and whose early ruler became
“converted” to the religion of the Jews and forced his subjects to do the same.
Thus, the Ashkenazim Jews have not even the excuse that their ancestors
ever lived in Palestine!
HOW THE NATIONAL HOME IDEA
WAS
PUT INTO PRACTICE.
The Zionist Jews have long coveted Palestine as a
future Jewish State.
At the Basle Zionist Congress in 1903, a Jew, Max
Nordau, made a remarkable prophecy: he referred to “the future world war. The
peace conference, where with the help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine
will be created.”
But Nordau’s powers of prophecy were not
supernatural. His forecast was based
upon knowledge of the intentions of the Jewish World Power which he knew would
bring about the war and the peace conference of which he talked so glibly eleven
years before the war began! Our readers know that the plan was carried out
to the letter.
In Protocol No. 2 of The Protocols of the Learned
Elders of Zion, which, as events have shown, detail the Jewish Plans for
World Domination, we find the following:—
“It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so
far as possible, should not result in territorial gains.”
This plan, also, was actually carried out; because
the victors were induced by means of propaganda to submit territories they had
conquered by the force of arms to Government by Mandate of the League of
Nations.
The British, with some help from Arab sources,
conquered Palestine, but they were not conquering it for Britain, but for the
Jews.
Mr. A. J. Balfour, Foreign Secretary, had written to
Lord Rothschild promising that if Palestine was conquered, it was the intention
of the British Government to allow it to become a National home for the Jews.
The date of this letter was 2nd November, 1917. It was the notorious Balfour
Declaration.
The National Home policy was declared in these
words:—
“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the
establishment in Palestine of a National
Home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to
facilitate the achievement of that object, it being clearly understood that
nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non‑Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political
status enjoyed by the Jews in any other country.”
A member of the Jewish Board of Deputies and a
Councillor of the Zionist Federation “spilled the beans” on the real reason for
the Balfour Declaration; this was the Jew, S. Landman, who wrote a letter
appearing in the Jewish Chronicle of 7th February, 1936, in which he
said:—
“The actual initiator was Mr. James Malcolm and the
circumstances were as follows:—During the critical days of the war, in 1916,
when the defection of Russia was imminent and Jewish opinion generally was anti‑Russian
and had hopes that Germany if victorious would in certain circumstances give
them Palestine, several attempts were made by the Allies to bring America into
the war, on their side. These attempts were unsuccessful. Mr. Malcolm, who, at
that time, was in close touch with the late Sir Mark Sykes (of the War Cabinet
Secretariat) and M. Georges Picot (of the French Embassy in London) and Mr.
Gout of the Quai D’Orsay (Eastern Section), took the initiative in convincing
these representatives of the British and French Governments that the best and
perhaps the only way to induce the American President to come into the War was
to secure the co‑operation of Zionist Jewry by promising them Palestine.
By so doing, the Allies would enlist and mobilise the hitherto unsuspectedly
powerful force of Zionist Jewry in America and elsewhere in favour of the
Allies on a quid pro quo basis. At that time, President Wilson attached
the greatest possible importance to the advice of Mr. Justice Brandeis {Jew}
(here the Jewish Chronicle prints four dots of omission). Sir Mark Sykes
obtained permission from the War Cabinet to authorise Mr. Malcolm to approach
the Zionists on that basis. Neither Sir Mark Sykes nor Mr. Malcolm knew who
were the Zionist leaders and it was Mr. L. J. Greenberg to whom Mr. Malcolm
applied for information to whom he should address himself. Mr. Greenberg
arranged for Mr. Malcolm to meet Dr. Weizmann {Jew} and Mr. Sokolow {Jew} whom
Malcolm put into communication with Sir Mark Sykes and later with MM. Picot and
Gout. Mr. Wickham Steed, in his book, “Through Thirty Years,” mentions Sir Mark
Sykes and Mr. Malcolm as the two individuals mainly responsible for the Balfour
Declaration. The Zionists carried out their part and helped to bring America
in, and the Balfour Declaration of 2nd November, 1917, was but the
public confirmation of the verbal agreement of 1916.”
Mr. Lloyd George in the House of Commons, 19th June,
1936, stated “ . . . . we decided that it was desirable to secure the sympathy
and co‑operation of that most remarkable community, the Jews, . . . In
these conditions, we proposed this (Balfour Declaration) to our Allies.”
So
there you have it. You also have there the absolute proof that the organised
power of Jewish money is the greatest political power on earth, strong enough
to demand its own terms for bringing a great Gentile Power into the War to
assist the Allies.
Balfour’s foolish letter appears to have been
written in a kind of irresponsible spirit characteristic of his lack of realistic
sense. Paul Cambon, the French Ambassador, reported to Lord Bertie of Thame
that Balfour had explained his support of Zionism as “partly financial, partly
political and partly sentimental, viz.—the necessity to conciliate the American
Jews who can supply money for loans” and that his (Balfour’s) own feeling was
“that it would be an interesting experiment to reconstitute a Jewish kingdom.”
(Diary of Lord Bertie of Thame,
Vol. 2, p. 233).
Ten years after the Balfour Declaration, Mr. Balfour
made a speech before the Anglo‑Palestine Club, 10th November, 1927, and
he said “I cannot help thinking that this experiment . . . is a great
experiment, because nothing like it has ever been tried in the world, and
because it is entirely novel. It is not an experiment in the sense that it is
as likely to fail as to succeed. That is not my view. I am an optimist about
this. I admit its experimental character.”
What right has any statesman to try experiments? No
responsible statesman ever does. He works only with methods tested by
experience. Experiment is beyond his duty. But it was true about the American
Jews and the loans they could make.
A BROKEN
PLEDGE.
However,
in making this promise to the Jews, Mr. Balfour had forgotten something; he had
forgotten that Sir Henry MacMahon, High Commissioner for Egypt, had already
committed the British Government in a promise to the Sherif of Mecca that in
return for Arab assistance to the Allies Great Britain would recognise and
support the independence of the Arabs in territories which included Palestine.
The boundaries of these territories were defined as follows:—
Mersina, on the North.
The borders of Persia up to
the Gulf of Basra, on the East.
The Indian Ocean (except
Aden) on the South.
The Red Sea and
Mediterranean Sea up to Mersina, on the West.
The only areas within these limits which were to be
excluded were “those portions of Syria lying to the West of the districts of
Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo.” One glance at the map is sufficient to show
that Palestine is not part of this excluded territory. Sir Henry MacMahon’s
promise was in a letter dated 25th October, 1915; the boundaries above
described were set out in the Sherif’s letter to MacMahon dated 14th July,
1915, and were agreed to by MacMahon, with the exception of the areas excluded
as stated above. The British Government confirmed the promises.
Thus, in return for services to be rendered (and
they were duly rendered) Palestine
had been promised to the Arabs two years before Balfour promised the country to
the Jews!
A SECRET FOR
THREE YEARS.
But although the Balfour Declaration was made in
1917, the British Government dared not publish it until 1920! If they had done
[so], what sort of fighting spirit would the British troops in Palestine have
shown, if they had known they were simply fighting for Jews? (One thing is
certain; the author of this pamphlet was, in 1916, engaged in breaking the
“ring” of the Somali camel‑owners in British Somaliland, who were holding
out for high prices against the needs of the British Government for camels to
overcome transport difficulties in the desert between Egypt and Palestine. He
succeeded in purchasing 3,500 good camels
at a reasonable figure; if he had known what he was purchasing them for, he
would not have bought a single camel!)
The Arabs assisted the Allies against the Turks
under the impression that Sir H. MacMahon’s promise was going to be fulfilled.
The blood of British soldiers and of Arabs was sold to the Jews.
Sir Henry MacMahon has recently denied that he intended
Palestine to be included in the Arab area. Nothing, however, can alter the
facts that are plain to anyone with a map before him. Palestine is not West of
the Damascus District; it is definitely and entirely South‑West. Had Sir
Henry desired to exclude Palestine from the promised area, he would naturally
have described the excluded territory as “west of the Jordan River,” but he did
not. It may be that Sir Henry MacMahon’s bias is too great for him; for he is
on the Supreme Council of the international brand of Masonry known as “the
Scottish Rite”; even in the 18th degree of that order, a man’s mentality
becomes approximated to that of a synthetic Jew; and Sir Henry has reached the
33rd degree!
THE HUMBUG OF
THE JEWISH NATIONAL HOME.
It is obvious from what has been said of the size of
Palestine that it could never accommodate more than a tiny percentage of the
number of Jews that infest the world. It is still more obvious that the vast
majority of Jews have not, nor ever had, the slightest intention of making
Palestine their National Home. They prefer to continue to prey upon the Gentile
world, and to continue to live parasitically on the soil of Gentile Nations.
The
Jews never wanted Palestine for a National Home in the usual sense of the word
Home; but a few Jews under the cloak of a demand for a National Home, greatly
desired to become possessed of what has been described by Major Tulloch, of the
Palestine Potash Co. Ltd., as “the most valuable spot in the whole world.”
(Speech made before the Royal Society of Arts, July, 1934.)
If the Jew Money Power could gain control of
Palestine through the false sentimentality of calling it a National Home for
the Jews, to be defended during its formation by British bayonets, they stood
to reap the following benefits:—
1. A Key-position in the
Near East.
2. Control of the Pipe‑Line
which brings Oil from Iraq, and which has its terminus on the coast at Haifa.
3. A Double‑Nationality
for Jews.
4. Control over the hitherto
unexploited Oil-field in Palestine.
5. The Dead Sea Wealth,
valued at 300 times the British debt to the United States of America.
Let us examine these points, one by one.
A
The intention is to make Jerusalem the Centre of the
future Jewish World Government.
The Jerusalem correspondent of the Daily
Telegraph, 27th June, 1936,
writes: “The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem . . . has asked Sir Arthur Wauchope, the
High Commissioner, to forward to the British Government a Note . . . the Note
states the principal aims of the Jews in Palestine are religious, and that they
intend to rebuild the Temple of Solomon on the site now occupied by the Mosques
of Omar and Aksa.”
Professor Schwartz‑Bostunitsch gives the
following information in his new book Judische
Imperialismus:—
“At the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus in A.D.
70, certain of the golden regalia of the temple were taken to Rome as booty of
war. When the Vandals sacked Rome in A.D. 455, the valuables changed hands
again; later, the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I, destroyed the African kingdom
of the Vandals and obtained possession of the Jewish treasures which were taken
to Constantinople. Yielding to the tale that the possession of these relics
would bring him bad luck, Justinian allowed them to be returned to Jerusalem
where they were placed in a church and soon came again into the hands of the
Jews.
“What is not generally known is that at the time of
Titus’ attack on Jerusalem, the Jews had succeeded in burying the more
important items, such as the Tables of the Law of Moses, Aaron’s rod, Solomon’s
crown, David’s sceptre, etc. The hiding place was on Mount Moriah, where in the
7th century, Kalif Abdulmelik built a mosque; there they remained until 1909,
when a party of American freemasons attacked the watchmen and dug up the
treasure. In connection with this, it is of interest to note that on the 1st
April, 1909, the Grand Orient Ottoman, was founded by representatives of 45
Turkish Masonic Lodges; on 27th April, Abdul Hamid was deposed; the Mason
Mehmed Djavid Bey became Finance Minister and was therefore in a position to
assist his American brethren, as the mosques came under his jurisdiction. Only
two newspapers, one French and one Russian, mentioned the robbery; the rest,
presumably, were silenced by the usual method; Djavid Bey lost his job at the
time but was eventually hanged in 1926 by Kemal Pasha for certain crimes of
office.
“The Jewish regalia are now to be found in the Grand
Lodge at Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A., which was the scene of the
activity of the notorious Masonic Chief of the Scottish Rites, Albert Pike.
(The Charleston Lodge was started in 1783 by two Jews, Morin and Dacosta, the
site being selected because it was on the 33rd degree Latitude).”
The regalia is being carefully preserved for the
crowning of the King of the World, when all the white races have succumbed to
the decomposing ferment of Jewish Communism and the Jew will sit on the throne
like a cock on a dung‑heap.
Friederich Hasselbacher in Der Hammer, April, 1936,
p. 132, reports that the headquarters of the “Grand Symbolic Lodge of
Germany” are now in Jerusalem; so also are those of the “Supreme Council of the
Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite” of Germany.
The Jewish paper, Judische Rundschau, 1921,
No. 83, wrote:—“The right place for the League of Nations is not Geneva or the
Hague . . . Ascher Ginsberg has dreamed of a Temple on Mount Zion where the
representatives of all nations should dedicate a temple to eternal peace.”
Ascher Ginsberg (1856‑1927) was the moving
spirit of fanatical Zionism. By putting two and two together, the reader will
discern the Jewish plan to establish the headquarters of World Freemasonry and
the League of Nations (now practically defunct) in Jerusalem.
CONTROL OVER
THE TERMINUS OF THE
The
Haifa pipe‑line supplies several million tons of oil, of especial
importance to our Mediterranean Fleet; the pipe is 700 miles long, and is
extremely vulnerable to attack; in 1937 it was fractured by sabotage 40 times,
the usual procedure being to shoot a hole in it and set fire to the escaping
oil. It would be easy, in an emergency, to interrupt the vital supplies of oil
from this source to our fighting forces.
A DOUBLE
NATIONALITY FOR JEWS.
An important ruling was made in Jaffa District Court
in June, 1934, that a British subject who voluntarily acquires Palestinian
citizenship does not thereby lose his or her British nationality. The Actions
Committee of the World Zionist Organisation has called upon Palestine Jews to
apply for naturalisation. Thus, Jews with Palestine nationality will come under
the League of Nations Convention (C.224, M.
That would allow a Jew in Britain to acquire
Palestinian Nationality and, if the war which the Jews are trying to bring
about takes place, to travel where he likes without obligation of service in
the British forces.
In April, 1935, in answer to a question by Miss
Rathbone regarding the nationality of British women who marry Palestinian
citizens, Sir John Gilmour, the Home Secretary replied:—“Palestinian
citizenship is not regarded as a
nationality for the purpose of British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act.
The wife would not lose British nationality by reason of the Palestinian
citizenship of the husband.”
One may well ask, when is a Nationality not a
Nationality?
The whole situation appears to be one in which a Jew
born here and acquiring Palestinian nationality could call himself British or
Palestinian, whichever suited his criminal interest at the moment.
THE
UNEXPLOITED
The Jewish plan is to maintain silence on the known
presence of Oil in Palestine, until such time as the Jews control the country.
Meanwhile, the vital needs of the British Navy are being treacherously
betrayed; the fact is that a large supply of oil could be obtained within easy
reach of the Mediterranean coast, and that the strength of British Power in the
Mediterranean Sea would be enormously increased if the oil were made available.
What evidence is there of Oil being there? Plenty:—
In The Fascist
for August 1931 (7 years ago!) we gave publicity to facts brought to our
notice by Dr. Homer, that an extensive oil‑field exists in the Jordan and
Dead Sea Valley; in November, 1931, we published an article thereon by Dr.
Homer herself, who, together with General Blakency, issued a leaflet on the
Betrayal of the Navy involved in the official silence concerning this potential
source of oil.
The evidence of the existence of the oil‑field
is as follows:
The Colonial Office admitted its existence in a
letter dated 5th April, 1927.
The Lynch Expedition, sent out by the U.S.A.
Government in 1849 reported it.
The French Expedition under the Duc de Luynes in
1864, with M. Louis Lartet as geologist, reported it.
The British Expedition under Mr. Hull in 1883
reported it.
The German Expedition under Professor Blankenhorn in
1911 reported it.
Professor Day of Beyrout reported it.
Dr. Arthur Wade, D.Sc., A.R.C.S., A.M.I.M.M.,
F.G.S., reported it.
The Oil Geologist of the Oil Trust, Ltd., Mr. D. P. Brown, reported it, giving the length of the Oil‑field as
ninety miles and its width thirty miles, and its depth below the surface as
about 1000 ft.
In The Handbook
of Palestine by H. C. Luke,
are the words “It is generally agreed that sunken blocks of the Ghor are
petroleum‑bearing and that oil will be obtained by drilling into the Senonian‑Turonian beds.”
In Awakening
Palestine, published as
long ago as 1923, and edited by
the Jews, Leon Simon and Leonard Stein, is a series of essays. A. Ruppin, p.
168, says:—“Many experts have expressed the opinion that rich oil‑wells
are likely to be found in the vicinity of the Dead Sea, and the fact that the
Standard Oil Company, which has already spent large sums on exploring, intends
to continue work in the same direction is the best proof that there is a well‑founded
hope of finding mineral oil in this region.” Mr. N. Wilbush, p. 183, writes:—“A
revolution will one day be affected [sic] by the petroleum which, from
all indications, stretches under the soil from Yarmuk to the Dead Sea, and can
be obtained in appreciable quantities at a depth of 300 to 500 metres.
Investigations were commenced a decade ago, but for various reasons were left
incomplete.”
We will deal with these “reasons” later.
L’Avenir Juif (The Future of the Jews),
quoted by The Patriot, 5th May, 1938, states that the
Negheb district of Palestine is rich in petroleum, and that the concession is
in the hands of the Iraq Petroleum Co., Ltd. The latter is international and
under Jewish control; one‑quarter of its shares are held through the
Anglo‑Saxon Petroleum Co., which is thoroughly Jewish, and which is
singularly successful in not finding
oil in the territories of the British Empire.
The South
African Jewish Chronicle, 14th
January, 1938, reports that the Palestine Government has drafted a new
Ordinance to regulate the mining of oil in that country; the publication of
this draft in the official gazette, says the S.A.J.C., “has given rise to much
thought as to its real purpose, for it is considered that were oil non‑existent
in Palestine in useful quantities, the Government would not have gone to the
trouble of drafting a new Ordinance.” Then the article continues:—“The
oil-bearing areas are south of the Dead Sea.”
Finally, we may quote the Jew Walter Roth, writing
in Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, News Edition, 20th August, 1938, p.
459:—
“For years it has been believed possible to find
petroleum in Palestine also, and in the opinion of an American specialist eight
regions are certainly oil‑bearing, of which four warrant the greater
expectations. At the close of last year, the mandate government proclaimed a
law for the regulation of the exploitation of petroleum deposits in Palestine.
The Iraq Petroleum Co. has formed a new company, Petroleum Development
(Palestine) Ltd. in London with £50,000 capital to bore for petroleum along the
entire Palestinian coast. With the erection of a petroleum refinery in Haifa, a
greater development of the country’s chemical industry is anticipated. The
development possibilities have been described in detail by Prof. Menchikovsky
in the journal Palestine and the Middle
East.”
The reader will by now wonder why nothing was done
about all this by the British Government. The fact is that the British
Government itself being under Jewish control has done everything possible to
put enquirers off the track so that the Oil‑field should not be made
available to the Navy, but should remain undeveloped until the Jews get full
control over the country.
Dr. Homer states (in a leaflet entitled Our Oil Position causes grave alarm) that the Colonial Office in an
official letter dated 5th April 1927
admitted the existence of oil in the Dead Sea areas but discouraged further
exploration on the absurd grounds that as the Standard Oil Co. was not proceeding
with its concessions it could not be there in paying quantities.
On 14th March, 1934,
Viscount Templeton asked the following question in the House of
Lords:—“Whether, in view of the grave menace of the dependence of our Naval and
Air Defence Services on alien or alien‑controlled sources of supply of oil, H.M.
Government will cease to leave the development of the Dead Sea Oilfield to
private enterprise, and will forthwith exercise its powers, under the Mandate
and the Agreement with the Emir of Transjordan, itself to institute, without
further delay, the prospecting for and development of these oil‑resources
which are situated in a most strategic and easily accessible position and which
are now under British control and protection.”
The answer he received from the Under‑Secretary
of State for the Colonies was to the effect that it was uncertain whether
substantial oil resources existed in the area mentioned!
It is known that strenuous
efforts had been made to get the Viscount to withdraw his
question.
The Jewish
Chronicle, 18th March, 1938, p. 45, reports the following questions
and answers in the House of Commons:—
“Sir Alfred Knox (Con., Wycombe) asked the Colonial Secretary whether, in view of the
dependence of this country upon oil produced in foreign countries, His
Majesty’s Government would allow the development of the Dead Sea oilfield to
proceed under the rights offered to a British subject, Dr. Homer, in 1933 and
renewed in 1934, that oil‑field being in a position of strategic
importance to the defence services of the Empire and in territory protected by
his Majesty’s forces. Mr. Ormsby-Gore said:
“The grant of oil rights, if oil is discovered in
“Sir A. Knox: Is it not a fact this lady was requested to go to
“Mr. Ormsby‑Gore: We have no reason to suppose that there is oil in
Industrial
& Engineering Chemistry, News Edition, 10th November, 1936, contains an article
by the Jew W. Roth, which is highly significant, for he writes:—“The question
whether Palestine possesses exploitable petroleum deposits has until now been
answered mostly in the negative; furthermore, a negative report has recently
been given in the English Parliament by the government. The opposite opinion is
held in some quarters, especially by American experts, who believe that
political reasons more than geological and economic considerations hinder
borings in
The whole damned plot is laid bare in the South African Jewish Chronicle,
To enable the Jews to exploit this oil at some
hypothetical date when they may get control over the country, the very
existence of the
THE DEAD
Major Brock, the British Government expert, of the
Canadian Geological Survey, has estimated the amount of salts in solution in
the Dead Sea as follows:—
Potash ... ... ... 2,000
million tons.
Common Salt ... ... 11,900 „ „
Magnesium ... ... 22,000 „ „
Calcium Chloride ... 6,000 „ „
Bromine ... ... ... 980 „ „
From the waters of the
Until the Nazi Revolution in 1933 the Jewish plan
was to obtain control over the Dead Sea salts by concessions, and then to allow
them to be practically undeveloped so that the prevailing monopoly prices for
Potash, which they controlled by possession of the deposits in Stassfurt
(Germany) and in Alsace might remain undisturbed; the price was the thing that
mattered, not the world’s need.
Potash, we may remind our readers, is a Key
Chemical, used as a fertiliser, especially in intensive agriculture, and in
Industry it is used in making lens glasses, and in the manufacture of aniline
dyes, soap, shrapnel-powder, hand‑grenades, fuses, matches and in
bleaching and weaving.
The three principal groups of artificial fertilisers
are Phosphates, Nitrogen and Potash; of these, the only constituent that can be
manipulated by Trusts so as to increase the cost of manures to the farmer, is
potash. Thus, a basic need of the British farmer could have been met by
reasonable exploitation of the Dead Sea Potash.
What happened?
British groups of patriots tendered for the Dead Sea
Salts concession many times between 1918 and 1925; as a result of political and
financial intrigue they were all turned down in favour of a Jew from
We have already quoted Major Tulloch as stating that
the
The chemists Dr. Homer and Professor Claude also
estimate that there is available gold in the
This makes our “war‑debt” to the
Now, in contrast to this, let us quote a speech of
the late Lord Melchett (Jew). In the house of Lords,
“I think it is a very dangerous thing that
statements should be made in this House . . . to lure unwary investors into the
idea that there is a Golden Fortune in the Dead Sea Potash . . . I know Mr.
Novoimesky, and I have discussed the matter with German, French and English
experts. None of them recommend that large financial groups should invest in
the Dead Sea Potash . . . in what I must describe as a somewhat speculative
enterprise.”
To this, Lord Thomson sarcastically replied:—“To
hear the noble Lord, Lord Melchett, one would think that only a born fool would
develop the Dead Sea, and yet we have seen reports upon the Dead Sea which show
that it contains not only Potash, but other substances of very great value . .
. We want to safeguard ourselves against a possible repetition of what happened
in the early part of the War, when Potash went up—however valueless it may be
in the eyes of the noble Lord, Lord Melchett—to the fabulous price of £80 per
ton.”
The half‑Jew Amery, who is now a Director of the Jew firm Marks & Spencer, also tried
to minimise the importance of the Dead Sea Concession in the eyes of the
Gentile. In answer to a question by Mr. Erskine in the House of Commons, he
said he did not consider the Concession of great value; it was “purely
speculative.”
It is obvious that no stone was left unturned to
keep the Briton out of the Concession and to place it in the hands of the Jews.
MOSLEY’S ORGANISATION SHOWS
ITS
The enormous potential wealth in
Lord Rothermere, wrote in the Evening News,
Well, of course they would! But it is not “putting
OTHER JEWISH
MONOPOLIES ACQUIRED IN
A
concession for the development of the water and electrical power of
Now we shall let the Jew M. Ettinger describe a few
other “wangles” in his own words. He was speaking to the Zionist Federation Conference
at
“Customs
Regulations. The Jews of
Palestine are the only section interested in industry and claiming protective
tariffs. For many years the Zionist Organisation has been trying to induce the
Government to give way to this demand . . . Protection means an increase in the
cost of living, and the Arab Population of Palestine objected to protective
tariffs. In spite of these difficulties our efforts have succeeded, and
practically all of the important industries are already protected against
competition from outside.”
Thus the Arab pays for the establishment of Jewish
industry in
Again:—
“Land. Zionists
often enquire why the Government is not supplying us with Crown lands free of
charge. Lately, considerable tracts have been put at our disposal by the
Government . . . We prefer not to give too much publicity to such grants so as
to avoid unnecessary excitement amongst our Arab neighbours in Palestine. You
will also remember that five or six years ago the Jewish world was upset by the
fact that Sir Herbert Samuel offered to the Arabs a valuable area of Government
land in the Beisan District. The British Government has come to an
understanding with the Zionist Organisation enabling us to obtain the larger
part of this land on conditions more favourable than those offered to the
Arabs. This is not known in
The Arabs were given terms less favourable than the
Jews, and the latter did not want it known, but Ettinger thought he was safe in
telling his Jew fellows in Australia about it because he was out of ear‑shot
of the robbed Arabs! Then he goes on:—
“We
shall keep on asking for more.”
Now read this:—
“Tiberias Hot Springs. These springs were the
property of the
“Atlit Salt Concession. This important
monopoly has been in Jewish hands for the last five or six years. Recently the
Government intended to abolish this monopoly and to open the salt market for
outside competition. We succeeded in avoiding this danger.”
HOW FARE THE
ARABS?
So far we have hardly touched the matter of how the
Arab majority in Palestine is affected by the Jewish influx. Our outlook is pro‑British
rather than pro‑Arab. But we think we can cut the story short by simply
pointing to the fact that the injustices done to the Arab population have
aroused them to oppose any further Judaisation of their country by force; and
so desperate are they that they pit their puny strength against the might of
the British Empire rather than submit. It may be said that they are receiving
help from foreign powers; even if they are, the fact is of no more importance
than the British and French assistance given to the Chinese against Japan.
The fact remains, and cannot be gainsaid, that it
has been left to the Arab community in Palestine, Christian and Moslem, to be
an exception to the application of the principle of self‑determination
which is supposed to govern the world’s politics since the War. Of course, the
reasons are that the Jew controls the world’s politics, except in certain
countries whose inhabitants have found a Leader, and that, where Jew interests
are concerned, all laws, regulations, principles and traditions are set aside; their money ensures that.
Jewish usury has taken its normal course in
Palestine, except that, as it is backed by British soldiery, it has taken
charge more quickly than elsewhere. It must be remembered that the Jewish
system is particularly repugnant to the Muslim, whose religion prohibits usury
altogether. Never was a deeper stain upon the Union Jack than when Britain
became the tool of Jewry by inflicting upon a defenceless people a scourge from
which enlightened nations are struggling to free themselves, the scourge of
Jewish Usury allied with Jewish Bolshevism.
As to the Jews themselves, consider the all‑Jewish
city of Tel Aviv in Palestine. The Jewish
Chronicle, 4th November, 1932, describes “sanguinary
collisions,” “a policy of terror,” “unheard‑of attacks and assaults”
between different types of workers; the 1935 British Government Report on
the Administration of Palestine says that in Tel Aviv the people “are
indulging in crimes almost unknown in Palestine until a few years ago, such as
counterfeiting, scientific safe‑breaking, passport and visa forgeries,
and bank frauds.” Commander Bodilly, a Tel Aviv magistrate described the town
early in May, 1934, as “one of the worst towns on the Mediterranean as regards
public order, and worse than a city ten times its size.”
The Times, 24th November, 1932, says that
licenses for the sale of liquor in Palestine have increased ten‑fold
since the war, and Muslims are said to be suffering from deterioration
therefrom; we remind our readers that to Muslims, alcoholic liquors are banned
by their religion.
Jewish influence dispossessed large numbers of Arabs
of their land by closing down the Agricultural Bank which was formed to assist
them, and foreclosing on them.
The immigration of large numbers of Jews into
Palestine has once again demonstrated that they are not capable of supporting
anything that can truly be called civilisation; whilst the Arabs find
themselves enslaved by them just as they did in the last century when Sir Richard
Burton, Consul at Damascus, lost his appointment by protesting, as a British
Officer, against the enslavement of Arabs by Jewish usury in Syria.
BALFOUR STANDS
CONDEMNED.
So pleased with his work was this irresponsible
trifler with the destinies of Britain, that he had his speeches on Zionism
published in a little book, edited by Israel Cohen, and published by Arrowsmith
in 1928. And this book ends with a Retrospect which is worthy of reproduction
here:—
“Ten years have elapsed since the Declaration on
Zionism made by me on behalf of the British Government in 1917. Nothing has
occurred during that period to suggest the least doubt as to the wisdom of this
new departure. The experiment was admittedly a bold one, dealing with a unique
situation in a manner wholly without precedent in history.
“I am, however, convinced that, if it be supported
by Jewish communities throughout the world, its success is assured, and that a
Home will be secured for the Jewish race in the land which is immemorially
associated with their name.—Balfour.”
Good men won the War; people like Balfour lost the
Peace.
SUMMING UP.
Here are the chief frauds and acts of bad faith that
have accompanied the attempt to make Palestine a Jewish National Home:—
1.
Hypocritical
abandonment of the policy of self-determination in the case of the Arabs.
2. Betrayal of the promise
made by Sir H. MacMahon to the Arabs that Palestine should be in their territory.
3. Betrayal for four years
of the Arabs who were fighting for Palestine as our Allies.
4. Betrayal of the British
soldiers fighting in Palestine, who were sold by their Government in return for
Jewish “money for loans.”
5. Demand of the Jews for a
National Home in which they never intended to go and live, and could not have
done if they had so intended.
6. Betrayal of the British
Empire and its Navy by deliberate and continued silence about the Oil‑field
which exists there.
7. Granting of concessions
for the principle monopolies in Palestine to immigrant Jews, with deliberate
ousting of British patriots and Arabs from competition.
8. Attempts to deceive the
Gentile into a belief that the Dead Sea is of little practical value.
WHAT IS TO BE DONE?
At the time of writing (October, 1938) Britain is
conducting, on behalf of the Jews, a shameful war on the Arabs, who, because they
will not submit to the spiritual and material degradation involved by Jewish
immigration, are, like the anti-Bolsheviks of Spain, termed “rebels.”
Nothing but the Fear of War in general prevents the
whole Muslim world from rising against us in righteous indignation of Judæo‑British
policy.
British soldiers are dying every week in a shameful
cause.
Peace could be secured tomorrow, merely by doing
justice to the Arabs by repudiating the idiotic Balfourian idea of a Jewish
National Home in Palestine. Not a voice, however, is raised by any Pacifist
society to bring peace to Palestine in this way. The Earl of Lytton talks peace
at the League of Nations Union meetings; but it does not seem to apply to
Palestine; he is the Chairman of the Palestine Potash Co. Ltd.!
Palestine was conquered by the force of British
arms, assisted by the Arabs, and should be proclaimed forthwith a British
Colony. A National Home for the Jews must be found; the best place is
Madagascar. For this, France and the displaced natives should receive full
compensation from Jewish funds. Once in Madagascar, or, if that island cannot
be made partly available to them, in a National Home elsewhere, no Jew should
be allowed outside it on pain of death. There is no other way. Hedge how you
like, there is no other way.
Under our Colonial Office, Palestine should be
nursed until the Arabs can stand alone. Every Jew should be cleared out of the
country.
Under the Treaty of Peace
with Turkey, Palestine was recognised as an independent State to be
administered by a Mandatory Power to be approved by the League of Nations.
America had no part in this Treaty, and the League of Nations is comatose and
dead for all practical purposes. Let us stop fooling. The world needs cheap
Potash and the British Navy needs Oil; above all, the Arab needs justice. We are told that the Versailles Treaty
is now “torn up.” The treaty with Turkey should be cancelled as far as
Palestine is concerned by the mutual assent of the parties to it, which could
be obtained. There is no need for any “tearing up.” And let America mind her
own business, for she was never at war with Turkey and will find herself plenty
to do before long in attempting to defend the unjustifiable Monroe Doctrine.
Our best friends in India
are the Muslims; the British Empire has the greatest Muslim population of any
other Power in the world. There always used to be mutual respect between Briton
and Muslim, and if there is one thing that the Muslim admires, it is justice.
We shall lose nothing in prestige if we admit to the Muslim world that under
Democracy, Britain has been the prey of the Jew, and has been entrapped into
using her power to enforce Jewish injustice upon the Arabs of Palestine. Unless
we admit the error, and repair it to the full, the Muslims of the world will
look elsewhere for justice. Let us be big enough to do it.