My revisionist translations include the Walter Lüftl
Report and both versions (long and short) of the Germar Rudolf Report, as well as STALINS VERNICHTUNGSKRIEG by Joachim Hoffmann (with considerable editing by other people), published in English as STALIN'S WAR OF EXTERMINATION, and a variety of articles and books by Carlo Mattogno and Jürgen Graf. I am a Member of the Institute of Linguists, London.
I am American by birth,
but presently stateless by virtue of formal renunciation of citizenship on 8 November 1984.
I am also a Hoaxoco$t revisionist. (In the 1984 Pavlovian
double-talk of the Jews, I am a "Hoaxoco$t Denier".)
We call it the "Hoaxoco$t" because it is a hoax, and
it costs plenty. In addition to the jillions of dollars already paid out, directly
or indirectly, in cash, goods, and services to Hoaxoco$t "survivors" and the
racketeer state of Israel since 1945, with new, improved "Hoaxoco$t survivor"
rip-offs, shake-downs, protection rackets, extortion rackets, blackmail schemes,
and related swindles being invented and refined almost every week; one would
need a computer to calculate the number of unprovoked "air strikes", invasions,
bombings, burnings, sinkings, shellings, confiscations, expulsions, tortures,
book-burnings, beatings, arrests and detentions, both with and without trial,
all caused by the insane delusion that we are fighting "Hitler" every five seconds,
in the need to prevent yet another "Hoaxoco$t"(for the umpteenth time).
Hitler's crimes are unique (or so we are told), but
there is a "Hitler" under every bed. Even Galtieri of Argentina ("las Malvinas
son nuestras") was compared to Hitler -- not to mention Saddam Hussein, Noriega
of Panama, and the democratically-elected (3 times) President of Serbia, a parliamentary
state with several opposition parties. But I digress.
I became a "Hoaxoco$t denier" between 1976 and 1978,
when I noticed that the chemical reactions described in Hoaxoco$t literature
are all incorrect, and all contradict each other.
Gas chamber executions occur under the judicial proceedings
in California. For example, the technology of gas chamber executions was described
fairly accurately by rapist Caryll Chessman in his best-selling book CELL 2455,
DEATH ROW, which I read as a small boy. When Chessman was executed, it must
have been one of the biggest news stories in California since Pearl Harbor.
This technology is described again every time there is an execution. Many years
later, reading the "confession" of Josef Kramer ("He gave me a bottle containing
about half a pint of salts. I think they were salts of cyanide... I introduced
a certain quantity of salt through a tube... they breathed for about half a
minute before they fell to the floor"), my immediate reaction was "where is
the acid?".
One might also ask how they plugged the hole, etc. etc.
But again I digress.
The mere fact that it requires one to one-and-one-half
hours to cremate a corpse, even in the most modern crematory oven, should be
enough, in itself, to bring down the whole Hoaxoco$t house of cards. Indeed,
one of my worst errors as a revisionist was to over-estimate the capacity of
crematory ovens; ovens I thought capable of 16 cremations a day (as compared
to hundreds or even thousands per day, according to the Jews) were, in reality,
capable of merely 3 or 4.
My 1978 essay on the subject, THE CHEMISTRY OF THE HOAXOCO$T,
has very little value today compared to hundreds of other papers by many other
people, particularly, Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolf, Friedrich Berg, and Walter
Lüftl, and in some respects is rather poor; but it shows how I became a
"Hoaxoco$t Denier". I did not do so frivolously.
The essay contains at least one error. Zyklon was not
"weak", but the evaporation rate was extremely slow. It was slowed deliberately
to make it less dangerous to human beings.
The reaction to this particular paper, which was widely
reproduced, was dramatic (death threats, hysterical phone calls, etc.). One
group was so kind as to give me a "trial" in my absence. They had a whole list
of crimes I had committed -- being "scum" was one of them -- after which I was
duly found "guilty" and "sentenced to death", with "sentence to be carried out
by a team of our specialists within one year" (20 years ago).
In 1978, I thought the Holocaust was a lie, but I still
thought it was an intelligent lie; I was wrong.
In 1988, after 10 years of research, I published MADE IN RUSSIA, THE HOLOCAUST, a collection of 400 pages photocopied from the Nuremberg
Trial transcript and related archives, "proving" a whole load of lies that nobody
believes any more
(i.e steam chambers, vacuum chambers, trapdoor chambers, quicklime chambers,
electrical chambers, human soap, trees as murder weapons, human hair socks,
human hair mattresses, plus an exclusive line of leather goods made out of human
skin which no one has ever seen)., etc. etc. etc.
To my amazement, there was almost no reaction to this
book, then or later. Almost the only reaction at all came from an otherwise
intelligent person who said, "Your book is absolutely amazing. Did the Germans
really have pedal-driven brain-bashing machines to make human soap?" When I
attempted to explain that the book was nothing more than a collection of obvious
lies, he couldn't quite understand. People are stupider than I thought they
were.
I would have thought that my sarcasm was unmistakable,
but no, people took it all absolutely seriously. My printer and bookseller told
me my irony just went over people's heads. Many other people understood the intent of the book,
but kept silent, for reasons best known to themselves. My own theory is that
MADE IN RUSSIA is so amazing that people don't know what to think, so they don't
say anything. Perhaps I am right, perhaps wrong.
In 1988, Ernst Zündel and video cameraman Jürgen
Neumann, produced a 90-minute video in which I commented upon a number of more
or less worthless Nuremberg Trial "documents", most of which did not duplicate
material from the book.
An interview with myself by Ernst Zündel, produced
in 1988, was not released until the early 1990s; I believe it is video number 7, sandwiched in between David Irving and Rudolf Hess. (A greater compliment,
unless it is an accident, can hardly be imagined). In 1992, I did a series of articles on Japanese war
crimes for purposes of comparison, entitled JAPS ATE MY GALL BLADDER, and undertook
to translate NOT GUILTY AT NUREMBERG into a variety of foreign languages, with
corrections and re-translations supplied by a wide variety of people (available
from Historical Review Press, PO BOX 243, Uckfield E. Sussex TN22 1ZY, England) or (Update September 2012: BM BOX 5581, LONDON WC1N 3XX, cheques/POs payable to 'British People's Party').
More recently, I co-authored a number of derivative
books with Vincent Reynouard, in French, based essentially on the same material,
but using the French version of the Nuremberg transcript as a basis. The first
of these was called DELIRE A NUREMBERG, and was said to have sold quite well.
On April Fool's Day 1998, after 17 months of proceedings
before 4 courts and a total of 7 judges, beginning with my appearance before
an examining magistrate in Verviers, Belgium on 4 November 1996 in answer to
"international letters rogatory" (a procedure normally used in the pursuit of
international car theft rings, etc.), I was convicted of "incitement to racial
hatred" in Munich Germany, and fined an odd sum of money (probably the most
they thought they could collect in view of the fact that I am self-employed
and have 4 children) ending in 20 pfennigs. The Germans are very exact.
For 17 months, the German courts ignored everything
I introduced in reply to the avalanche of subpoenas, summonses, certified letters,
certified translations, demands for payment, etc.. Jokes,
insults, sarcasm, refusals to appear, demands for the production of evidence,
irrefutable legal arguments, refusals to pay, etc. were all ignored -- like
a computer continually displaying the same error message.
Intrigued by the date of my final conviction, and in
an effort to determine whether or not the Germans are really as stupid as they
would very often seem to appear, I sent the Munich State Prosecutor's Office
a 10 pfennig-piece Scotch-taped to my Final Statement to the Court (in which,
for the third or fourth time, I refused to pay anything -- there are 11 files
of these proceedings on this site), asking them to deduct 10 pfennigs from the
amount owing, and send me a receipt for it. They did. I haven't heard from them
since. They spent a fortune prosecuting me, including mountains of certified
translation work, German into French, French into German, German into English,
English into German, wasting 17 months of their time, then they sent me a receipt
for 10 pfennigs.
On 23 September 1998, the Belgian social security system
took me to court and bankrupted me, making it impossible for me to work; two
lawyers advised me to disappear. I am now separated from my family for the first
time in 26 years. On the bright side, this renders me conveniently judgement-proof
for further proceedings; all they can do is imprison me. I sometimes wonder
how many years they have sentenced me to in absentia without telling me about
it.
On October 22, 1998, LE MATIN, a daily newspaper published
in Liege, Belgium, printed six large articles about me and my "trial" (top of
front page, all of page 2, large article top of page 3), calling for my imprisonment
and hinting subtly that I deserve to be killed. Vincent Reynouard and I replied
to this in a 25 page brochure entitled CARLOS PORTER REPOND A SES ACCUSATEURS.
Although the Germans have no authority with which to
arrest me at present, I am under no illusion that they will fail to "get me"
sooner or later.
For those who fail to see a pattern in recent events,
I shall make it as clear as I can: The Pedro Varela case in Spain shows that
you can be accused of "genocide" even if all you have ever done is dispute the
authenticity of the Diary of Ann Frank. Varela was (and, by some miracle, still
is) a book-seller specializing in revisionist and National Socialist literature.
The Pinochet Case in London shows that if you are accused
of "genocide" you can be arrested and extradited anywhere in the world.
The unprovoked NATO war of aggression against the sovereign
state of Serbia shows that if you are accused of "genocide", you will be accused
of every possible atrocity and bombed into the Stone Age without a declaration
of war.
This creates the precedent, and the authority (although
it is totally illegal) to arrest revisionists and nationalists, anywhere in
the world, at any time. This is the 1984 international totalitarian terror state
of the future, predicted by Aldous Huxley in his 1950s essay BRAVE NEW WORLD
REVISITED.
For example: if the Spanish Constitutional Court (just
as an example) upholds Varela's appeal on the grounds that the law under which
he was convicted of "genocide" is unconstitutional, the Government of Spain
will be guilty of "aiding and abetting in genocide", and Spain can be bombed.
Any nation-state which attempts to assert its sovereignty or independence in
any manner whatsoever, can now be bombed.
In the same year, 1988, I published NOT GUILTY AT NUREMBERG, which originated as a series of corrections to NUREMBERG AND OTHER WAR CRIMES
TRIALS by Richard Harwood (David McCalden), following essentially the same format.
This book, with approximately 1000 references, was more successful (Update September 2012: All orders to BM BOX 5581, LONDON WC1N 3XX, cheques/POs payable to 'British People's Party' ).
Whatever is happening in Serbia (ex-Yugoslavia) is the collapse of a multicultural, multiracial state. Europe is the ex-Yugoslavia of tomorrow. The message is very clear: resistance to the dictates of the multiracial dictatorship of tomorrow (excuse me: of today) will be met by "death from above".
The inevitable result of all of this can only be the
following:
a) a huge increase in international terrorism (for example, blowing up embassies
and killing tourists);
b) a huge increase in the international arms race (since every two-bit country
in the world -- Haiti, Panama, Somalia, etc. etc. -- will require nuclear weapons
and nuclear missile delivery systems to prevent arbitrary attack by the United
States -- which really means: by Israel -- at any moment.;
c) a frantic search for cheap new weapons which can be employed by weaker countries
(which probably means: biological weapons); and
d) a huge upsurge in regional nationalism, at least in the Balkans, since every
ethnic, national, and religious group in the region has some claim against some
other (and there are hundreds), every one of which has been encouraged by NATO's
ignorant, destructive, and hypocritical support of Albanian claims to Kosovo.
For example, Greece has a centuries-old claim to half of Albania. If the Albanians have a right to part of Serbia (and Kosovo is part of Serbia, whether anybody likes it or not), then why don't the Greeks have a right to part of Albania? And so on, ad infinitum.
What is doubly ironic is that the crimes of which Serbia stands accused are the same crimes in which Israel has always specialized: Israel is a torture state, the "ethnic cleanser" par excellence.
Let us hope that the above-mentioned upsurge in nationalism spreads generally, accompanied and strengthened by the knowledge that the Hoaxoco$t is a lie, all lies, and nothing but lies.
Carlos W Porter
May 15, 1999.
Note: the predictions marked in red above came true, but not quite in the way I imagined. I was not expecting the President of the United States, with 25 Zionist "neocon" advisors, to telecrash 4 airplanes, blow up 3 buildings, fake an anthrax scare and start 2 wars in less than a year. Terrorist, heal thyself.
click to enlarge
"Well, flesh-fly, it is summer with you now;
Your winter will come on."
- Ben Jonson
--
CARLOS W. PORTER
MAY 18, 2004
See also:
Fool's Crusade: Yugoslavia, NATO and Western Delusions by Diana Johnstone
To Kill a Nation by Michael Parenti
Globalization Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century by James Petras and Henry Veltmeyer
Image of the Bushnik stolen from
http://www.politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blbushpictures.htm