It might be interesting to note that Colin Jordan, a British citizen, a man with serious health problems, is being legally attacked by the thought police for writing what I thought was just a humorous tale -- www.faem.com/books/books.htm -- Merry England 2000. He, and another, face hard time prison sentences if convicted which, I am sure, BritZOG will move heaven and earth to do. Will I be next for having the audacity to post something I did not write? Even so, I think that I shall not take any vacations in England right away. "It can't happen here." Don't kid yourself whitey for you are losing political control of a country you founded and built. I do not trust that mestizos and/or asians will treat us as we presently treat them, if they gain the upper hand. I think we've had glimpses of the future whenever any non white group gains power anywhere. How many honkies do they cater to? Why not ask the former Rhodesians?

We are in a pre revolutionary stage and most honkies pretend that those nagging "vibes" are just not there. The rapid increase in youth suicide is a harbinger of times to come. Youth violence is also another indicator as it expresses a lashing out at something which is not understood -- a helplessness, as it were. The McVeigh thing shows us that, and Tim was not one of a kind. I am sure the whole white world is full of such young people just waiting for the opportunity to do something constructive but feel helpless in a [rison of ever-diminishing freedoms. What can be done? What can they do?

Understand that those so disturbed by the enveloping tyranny are in a minority and always have been throughout history. Russian goof-asses would open their gates to Genghis Khan in full knowledge of what he does to villages and people. It's the age old emotional trap -- we never did him any harm, so why should he harm us? Obviously such people have never had the experience of swimming in a crocodile infested river.

ZOG does not yet have the total political power it seeks. That's why it still needs the general support of the public and babbles about rights, and freedom of this or that. If ZOG were total, you wouldn't be reading this and I'd be off somewhere in an American gulag. In this process, ZOG uses its immense Marxist propaganda machine to discredit any white person who objects to seeing his land smothered in the mud of 'diversity'. White people who break the law -- robbing armored cars, killing people, defacing property, even public intoxication -- will be arrested with the full approval of the body politic. You might think you are engaged in a political act on behalf of some 'cause', but ZOG and the public views you as a petty criminal. My advice: be patient and stern. You'll see many of the foolish bend to whim and "go with the flow". You shouldn't be surprised, for no revolution was ever brought about by slugs whose greatest moments are spent at a niggerball game. Look at Adams, Jefferson, Henry, Franklin, and so on -- how 'ordinary' were these men?

None of us knows if he personally will be around on Der Tag. Prepared people living in Arizona own umbrellas.

Americans, by a large part, appear to want a 'multi-cultural' environment. They have never really experienced one and so their naivety is to be expected. Let the "others" spread their diseases, commit the crimes, furnish ever-increasing tax burdens, add their incompetence, etc. Let them riot when whitey can no longer supply what they demand. In other words, you might see the disadvantages of treating muds as members of the family, due to your sharper vision, but the majority really needs their noses rubbed in it in order for them to question the smell. Even when they reek of the brown stuff, they will be looking for some 'easy fix', which today means spend more money and talk it to death. Like the energy situation and the disease problem, it will not continue much longer in its present form.

Do not break the law for when you do, you automatically place yourself on the level of those the public is increasingly becoming intolerant of. The day will come, when respect for "the law" will have dwindled and white folks will see, on a personal level, that it does not work to their advantage and then, illegal acts against one's enemies will be accepted. Didn't the rabble rousing black communist M.L.K establish a precedent when he claimed that one did not have to obey an "unjust law"? Didn't the sadistic, and farcical, Nürmberg trials establish a precedent by stating that officers should not have obeyed commands from their superiors. Didn't all of the Allied legal monkey motion establish that ex post facto laws are the new form of "justice"? "The law" is a bogey man which has substance ONLY TO THE DEGREE THAT IT IS SUPPORTED  by the majority. When a law works against any group, as the 'race' laws are starting to do, they will become unenforceable.

Keep your powder dry and your eye on the ball.

Since you vanished, I decided to steal some items from your house before your relatives stole them. I grabbed your diary because it had a purple leather cover. I like purple leather. I was in possession of a document.

As I read about the rock falling on your foot, could I accept your statements as fact, truth, reality? Could that event be verified -- verification is always necessary to establish the truth of anything. I went to the field but found no rock as described. Well, I couldn't verify that. I wasn't around when the event transpired, so I couldn't verify that either. I did however manage to verify that you swore that you told the truth, but did you? The Notary Public just took your word for it and if so moved, he wouldn't have been able to verify your story either.

All of us have access to only a few grains of that mountain called fact, truth, reality. What most of us accept to be fact is little other than faith, a belief, an opinion. If the world were composed of people like the Clinton's, then there would be no "glue" to hold anything together because what would there be to believe in and build upon?

When a society degenerates in to a body of liars and thieves, it will not stand long. That's always been the history of "banana republics" and we are eagerly importing it along with equal opportunity diseases which will assuredly tax our ability to stop them -- if we are able -- which looks very unlikely.

Let's not get gung ho about labeling our opinions "fact". That's the benchmark of the ignorant and bigoted. If you found a "fact" in a book, then quite possibly it might just be a fable, a bit of hearsay, a parcel of words pasted together for profit -- most books suffer the latter.

I have a set of directions on how to make explosive fulminates. It is factual? I dunno but I can determine that by the process of verification. I grab an old silver spoon, a good pint of vodka and a few ounces of nitric acid. I follow directions. So far so good. I take the shiny crystals from the soup plate I used, and stuff them into Limbaugh's cigar. When Rush lights his cigar, it detonates and paralyzes his flapping lips. Verification completed. The recipe was factual. Until even a few of those "holocaust" tales are verified by field demonstrations, then they will forever be confined to the prison of opinion.

Ernst Zündel once said that the American people should be made to pay for the unnecessary savagery they showered upon Germany and the Germans during WW II. Eric mentioned that this would not be necessary since the Americans are deep into the process of punishing themselves. I have no argument with this. Let the whipping never stop until the beast is dead.

Any group is catalogued according the the traits exhibited by the majority. John Merrick, the 'elephant man' did exist but did that make him a part of normal human life? Not in my book. Deuterium does exist but I cannot, for the life of me, consider it "normal" hydrogen. Over and over again, I discover that many people are not able to distinguish between what is 'average' and that which is 'normal'.

In my experience, the more books a person reads, the more dependent he becomes upon books for the "truth". As the goofs who are mesmerized by computer games increase their addiction, it portends a bleak future for white kind as these idiots often are unable to distinguish anything in the real world. They become insane to one degree or the other and generally useless except for being turned into fertilizer and even then, I'd question the quality.

Why would anyone want to be a 'lone wolf'? Burglars like the idea as do most criminals who only form units because of something they cannot handle independently. Once accomplished, they revert to their solitude. A 'lone wolf' always has something to hide -- usually himself. When I was a kid, we called such types "sneaks" for indeed they were. If one has the strength of any conviction, then he does not hide it. In this regard, I have seen dozens of jews who have far more substance than many of the blightwingers I have had the opportunity to know. In the end, it's all about character and 'lone wolves' are apparently not interested in developing any.

     Using the imagery of aggressive predator animals as unit symbols has an honored history in heraldry.  Trying to model human behavior and a political strategy on the life pattern of any species of animal is just idiotic.  I don't even know of any successful historical precedents.  In such a case ZOG becomes much more nearly correct to say we should try to emulate negroids or Chinese.  Certainly we are vastly closer to them genetically than we are to wolves.

    Better than either of the above cases is to study and adapt the successful methods of white men of other eras.  I am well aware of Louis Beam's excellent historical dissertation on the patriotic guerrilla actions conducted against Brit-ZOG loyalists during the First American Revolution. They were a large part of his theoretical justification for leaderless resistance.

    What Beam neglected to tell you is that those actions were undertaken in conjunction with a standing political center (the Continental Congress) and several regular armies in the field (the Continental Army plus some other formations).    They also had external military support from the King of the French, the King of Prussia and the Czar of Russia.   It was these other
organizations that kept the British Army busy and unable to concentrate its main effort (schwerpunkt) against those earlier so-called leaderless resisters.

    I think our point stands.

    Strength and Honor      ---     Maguire

The average American flatly refuses to learn anything, even from experience, and that's why he is TOTALLY DEPENDENT upon others to do his thinking. That's why he believes all sorts of nonsense since he cannot compare it to anything, and if he could, he wouldn't -- the mark of the true bigot. When one of them manages to convince himself that he has learned something, what he really is talking about is parroting -- like the play back section of some recorder. Eric feels that the American white public is too down bred to save itself. I am a little more optimistic for I blame this "dumbing down" on our Marxist government and their inane "education" programs plus the near total lack of real foreign news presented by our controlled mass media. Time will tell.

In 1973, I believe, there was another energy crisis -- a shortage of gasoline. The Talmudvision people showed hundreds of Californians lined up at the pumps to get gasoline which wasn't there. As dictated by capitalistic profiteering, the prices shot up. I called one of my boyhood friends who was a minor honcho at Union 76, a giant oil producer. He said that there was ample gasoline but somewhere in the back room, the "boys" had decided to block delivery to the local gas pumps. What ZOG was trying to do is whip the American boob into a frenzy sufficient to accept entry into another war against their better interests. The war never came about and the prices never dropped. An interesting parallel price rise took place in the natural gas industry. People were encouraged to cut back on their heating by lowering the thermostat to 65 degrees, or lower. Most people did, at least in the northeast. The natural gas companies then complained about the loss in profits due to the loss in sales. ZOG stepped in and allowed them to TRIPLE the price. Once done, natural gas miraculously recovered from its "shortage". Someone benefited. Yes? I'll bet it wasn't the family man doing his best to support a family.

ZOG is a racket run by the super-rich and they keep the working man suppressed by requiring him to feed an ever-increasing horde of parasites which supply most of the votes for the candidates of the super-rich. Whether Republican or Democrat, it's all run by ZOGlings and none of them qualify as poor. Even when a third party arises, as with the whore-dwarf Perot, it's is still owned by ZOG. We have only one political party but with several names.

If we "conserved" to a point where an equilibrium were established, it would not last long since the demands of our parasites, plus those of the invaders, would insure yet another crisis-shortage. Even if the growing world population were of good quality, which they are not, you simply cannot have a continuing body-count expansion on a finite planet. If white people -- the only people capable of somewhat controlling Nature -- do not get their act together soon,  the gods will return this planet to one which runs more smoothly, even if it means no more genus Homo. Of all the critters on this planet, only humans appear to always act in a manner detrimental to their long term interests. Any intelligent god must have long ago abandoned us as "hopeless".

I am thoroughly opposed to the acts of people such as Matthew's and Lane. It is nothing personal because I never met them. The result of their acts has benefited no one except ZOG who makes a production out of their "white" allegiance, thus serving to discredit any LEGITIMATE white coalition. These self deluded men certainly have the substance we sorely need but playing into the hands of a government, more and more people are starting to despise, is the ultimate folly. For whatever reason, these men committed definable criminal acts and the general population still views them as such. To identify white leadership with criminality is hardly an asset, at least, not in my book.

One fellow perhaps summed up his ire this way: "The moment you rob a bank for a cause that, Sir, is a political action!" It's evident that he and I do not use the same dictionary. I always resort to earlier editions of Webster's Unabridged due to the lesser amount of politically correct redefining.

cause -- a goal or principle served with dedication and zeal. I suppose this fits best with the "14 words" paraphrase of Dr. Goebbel's statement. Many people also feel attached to this 'cause'. I have no objection to fan clubs.

political -- having or marked by a definite or organized policy or structure with regard to government. Government is the exercise of authority in a political unit. A political unit consists of people composing a PARTY. Pray tell, what is the name of D.L.'s political party -- the Idaho Tree Dwellers; the Denver Bar Shakers? A "cause" is not a political party and hence anything in its name cannot be political in nature.

If there were in existence a "blue patriot" political party, which seems ludicrous since most blightwingers are not organized to any degree, then murder and robbery might be construed to mean a "political action" by members of that party. However, ZOG would never consider that a political action. Political actions are not  immune from the prevailing law, as a much wiser Hitler soon learned. You might think of something as "political action", but both the ordinary citizens and ZOG consider it criminal if it breaks the law. Any person soberly interested in the retaking of the white political power which was given away, MUST ABSOLUTELY appeal to the vast majority of those so defined. Otherwise, they are just a gaggle of bandidos with grandiose fantasies.

Let's suppose that George Bush Sr. rushes out, robs a bank and kills someone because he didn't like what the man said on radio. He believes, and later claims as a defense, that he was acting politically in the name of the Republican Party. How many Republicans would cheer? How many Democrats would rush to change allegiance? If he were found guilty and locked up, would he be called a "political prisoner"?

I suggest that all read WLA-4 and read it again. Study it. Some of you need to be awakened from your daydreams.

I was in the market buying my quarts of high fat milk when I noticed a young fellow stacking soup cans for some sale display. He was piling them vertically and it started to resemble a certain tower in Pisa. I stood back and watched it migrate towards a more accurate model -- leaning. There was brisk crash with an encore of bouncing and rolling cans. As I started to leave, smiling of course, another man mentioned that the fellow obviously never studied high school physics. I did not agree with his assessment because it has the cart before the horse. Science is mostly an after-the-fact effort used as a means to discover "why?". If that can be answered, then one doodles some applicable mathematical expression which serves as a description and a recipe for possible prediction. Does any person capable of observation and contemplation need some math mumbo-jumbo or a physics course to tell him how to stack cans? If you learn from experience, then you'd do a good job and prove your intellectual superiority to any batch of diploma heads. I saw this in spades especially during my drag-racing era. People would come in, slipping their slide rules (a wonderful form of calculator --  invented by a white man naturally), and making calculations. They were always beaten by 'Wayne the wrecker' who tried certain things, and was bright enough to notice if he was going in the right direction. "Damn," the guy said, "but my fingers hurt." "Then why do you insist upon leaving them in a vise?"

Below Niagara Falls, there are huge tubes which capture some of the river's strongly flowing water. The tubes direct the water so that turbines will turn. The spinning turbines turn a generator which, thanks again to the magnificent white man, generates electricity. Aside from  the massive expense of building and maintaining such an apparatus, it appears that power is manufactured out of thin air -- thicker water in this case. The fact is that the velocity of the water LEAVING the tubes, or chutes, is LESS THAN that which enters it. Hydro-electric power plants slow down the flow of a river's water.

The efficiency of all such devices, whether powered by water, or wind, is a function of those 2 velocities -- inlet and outlet. If the ratio of the outlet to the inlet velocity = 1, then the efficiency = 0 since no energy was transformed. If the outlet velocity = 0 then the efficiency is 100 percent since all of the energy was converted. (This would pose an interesting problem since the water would start to back up.) A velocity ratio of 1/2 relates to a 25 percent efficiency which is about all we could expect.  "Super efficiency" turbines are so in a relative sense and should not be considerd as even coming close to 100 percent.

The 'Lone Wolf' rarely exists in nature.  When one does occur it's either a genetic defective or is rabid.  Real wolves travel and cooperate in extended family packs.  This is as true of the canine variety as it was of the U-Boat variety.  That's why they're so dangerous.  The real natural order is 'Wolf Pack'!

Lone Wolves often end up in jail or become dead.  Theoretically there are many who succeed.  Part of being a successful 'Lone Wolf' means keeping quiet after the deed.  This in itself is a prescription for political failure since by definition politics involves multiple human beings.  Even implemented successfully Lone Wolves merely raise the general level of violent anarchy and cause people to look to government for law and order.  No wonder ZOG media promotes them so heavily.

Yes, friends, playtime is running out and the blightwing games are starting to burn out. Soon, it will be time to stand up and be counted.

"Yes sir, my friend, you are on the mark. Remember this -- most young men today are just as smart as those of 100 years ago. Don't forget that. Math, for example, was taught as a true disciplined skill which everyone had a tiring 'workout'. Kids then came out of grammar school fully functional but that sort of education is being denied most young people today. I'd bet my nose on it, that if you had the proper lower school training, you'd not be stumbling over educational things as you do today. My dad's generation was not a pack of geniuses, but just ordinary people and they certainly would out perform a comparable age group today. You younger people have had it shoved up your ass but you should remain cool and collected. People who know what is going on will be valuable assets in the very near future. Best wishes and thanks for writing."

http://seattlep-i.nwsource.com/national/21881_militia07.shtml

Adolf Hitler on the subject of 'Militias' from Mein Kampf, Chapter IX:

"On purely practical grounds it is impossible to build up a national defence organization by means of private associations, unless the State makes an enormous contribution to it. Whoever thinks otherwise overestimates his own powers. Now it is entirely out of the question to form organizations of any military value for a definite purpose on the principle of so-called ‘voluntary discipline’. Here the chief support for enforcing orders, namely, the power of inflicting punishment, is lacking. In the autumn, or rather in the spring, of 1919 it was still possible to raise ‘volunteer corps’, not only because most of the men who came forward at that time had been through the school of the old Army, but also because the kind of duty imposed there constrained the individual to absolute obedience at least for a definite period of time.

That spirit is entirely lacking in the volunteer defence organizations of today. The more the defence association grows, the weaker its discipline becomes and so much the less can one demand from the individual members. Thus the whole organization will more and more assume the character of the old non-political associations of war comrades and veterans.

It is impossible to carry through a voluntary training in military service for larger masses unless one is assured absolute power of command. There will always be few men who will voluntarily and spontaneously submit to that kind of obedience which is considered natural and necessary in the Army.

Moreover, a proper system of military training cannot be developed where there are such ridiculously scanty means as those at the disposal of the defence associations. The principal task of such an institution must be to impart the best and most reliable kind of instruction. Eight years have passed since the end of the War, and during that time none of our German youth, at an age when formerly they would have had to do military service, have received any systematic training at all. The aim of a defence association cannot be to enlist here and now all those who have already received a military training; for in that case it could be reckoned with mathematical accuracy when the last member would leave the association. Even the younger soldier from 1918 will no longer be fit for front-line service twenty years later, and we are approaching that state of things with a rapidity that gives cause for anxiety. Thus the defence associations must assume more and more the aspect of the old ex-service men’s societies. But that cannot be the meaning and purpose of an institution which calls itself, not an association of ex-service men but a defence association, indicating by this title that it considers its task to be, not only to preserve the tradition of the old soldiers and hold them together but also to propagate the idea of national defence and be able to carry this idea into practical effect, which means the creation of a body of men who are fit and trained for military defence.

But this implies that those elements will receive a military training which up to now have received none. This is something that in practice is impossible for the defence associations. Real soldiers cannot be made by a training of one or two hours per week. In view of the enormously increasing demands which modern warfare imposes on each individual soldier today, a military service of two years is barely sufficient to transform a raw recruit into a trained soldier. At the Front during the War we all saw the fearful consequences which our young recruits had to suffer from their lack of a thorough military training. Volunteer formations which had been drilled for fifteen or twenty weeks under an iron discipline and shown unlimited self-denial proved nevertheless to be no better than cannon fodder at the Front. Only when distributed among the ranks of the old and experienced soldiers could the young recruits, who had been trained for four or six months, become useful members of a regiment. Guided by the ‘old men’, they adapted themselves gradually to their task.

In the light of all this, how hopeless must the attempt be to create a body of fighting troops by a so-called training of one or two hours in the week, without any definite power of command and without any considerable means. In that way perhaps one could refresh military training in old soldiers, but raw recruits cannot thus be transformed into expert soldiers."

Maguire