If brown eyes are a white characteristic, then where did blue eyes originate? Did blue eyed whites pop up somewhere else thus producing two different white types? Doesn't that seem a little weird? How come a separate batch of blue eyed blacks, or blue eyed yellows, didn't also mysteriously pop up -- evolve -- be created -- hatched --  manufactured -- or whatever?

If blue was only a mutation, then why were the yellows and black immune? Mutations are rare and since blue is recessive, it should have disappeared faster than a jew at a Nazi reunion. At one time, blue eyes must have been very, very numerous.

Any pod of blue eyed people, sticking to their own kind, will always produce blue eyed offspring. When you take any herd of so-called whites with brown eyes, all of the kiddies will not have brown eyes. Blue eyed people breed true to type and if that doesn't mean anything to you, then you been sniffing too much strange stuff.

The terms "white eyes" and  "blue eyed devils" have been used historically to indicate white men especially by the yellow peoples. The Greeks of today are not the same people as the Greeks of old and Italians are not Romans. The present Egyptians are black/white mongrel mixtures and not the Egyptians of ancient times. The Tokarians whose corpses were recently discovered had blue eyes. So did the ancient Egyptian mummies. Why not visit some wax museum? Or are they now rendered politically correct?

Brown eyes are an ancient contamination in the sense that its interjection prevents white people from breeding true to type in this one aspect.

Why so many people have gone 'ape' over this small point is beyond me.

On another note, one fellow writes that the outward effects of genetic structure -- behavior -- should be the criteria for "whiteness". How about all of those Affirmative Action blacks who act white? Or the orangutan who hugged and kissed Clint Eastwood in Every Which Way But Loose? A recessive characteristic IS STILL THERE waiting for its chance to leap into action and do its thing.

I'll wager a bit that every person who disputes my point is a college kid, with his head full of complicated words for simple things,  who never spent any time on a farm. "Education", as peddled today, is disjoint from reality. If you examine manure in the laboratory, you'll find it stuffed with vitamins, minerals and enzymes. Now that's worth eating.

Use solar power fans at the poles to blow the cool air toward the equator. This I call "Environmental Marxism" where everything is lowered to some common denominator.

Hell, why blast the earth into a further orbit? All we need to do it change the axis of inclination so the poles become the equator and the tropics, the poles. This could be done periodically like changing places during a gang-bang.

Most know that industry uses large steam refrigeration units where super heated steam whistles though Hastaloy jets and its expansion produces cold. Only a whitey could invent such a thing. Anyway, the earth's magma, along with ocean water, could produce the steam and away we go. We'd have to be careful though, or we would be subject to a fit of "global cooling."

Perhaps if we could feed our billions of bipeds fava beans and then have a gathering at Keokuk where we could all point our tails toward the sun. Upon command, we'd have a community fart which might just provide the propulsion necessary to "nudge" the earth further out.

Friends, it's getting wackier by the minute. Cheers!

Menachem Wolfovich Begin, an outstanding and upright member of the Israeli tribe, won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1978. He blew up the King David Hotel killing hundreds of people. He bombed a few other places killing many more. The British had a reward on his head of about $45,000. Cheap Brits!

Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, an outstanding and upright member of the Tempu tribe, won the the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993. His specialty was blowing up crowded railway stations which killed hundreds and hundreds of women and children. He also was the inventor of the "necklacing" technique, probably using Firestone tires.

I will agree that Tim didn't kill as many people with his bombing, but that should not prevent him from winning the Nobel Peace Prize, should it? It would be a shame if he missed it by only a few bodies.

Why doesn't anyone take guys like a Chief Warrant Officer 5 (CW5) with 35 years in the trenches, as soldier, NCO and officer seriously? Here are some examples what he and others say about life in a unit of the Army's rapid deployment Corps.

* On leadership: "After 35 years, I can no longer deal with poor leadership. Today's leaders are more scared of the equal opportunity office than of getting soldiers killed. They strive to outdo each other with superficialities, instead of conducting
morale-boosting training. Checking the box and lying defines life as an officer today."

One junior Captain reiterated to the Chief that she was leaving the Army because of "cat box" leadership. She explained it as
leadership too busy with covering up crap, instead of tackling low morale and training troops.

* On female troops: "Leaders are terrified of female soldiers, and scared to make them meet standards. Why else are they selling
size 8 7/8 hats in the clothing sales store other than trying to circumvent making females meet hair standards?  When the body fat
limit for females was 34%, many couldn't meet the standard. Leadership solution: Raising the limit to 36% -- and still, the same
number can't meet the lowered standards."

* On standards: Units are constantly lowering standards for discipline and reenlistment. Recently, a Division redefined "good
troop": "Leaders on post were told that separation criteria would be increasingly scrutinized. We were told that if a soldier had
less than four "hot" urinalysis results, we would still keep him/her.   (Maguire note:  this is already a 100% lowering of
standards  from the 1980s.  Used to be "two strikes and you're out.")  Good leaders should turn a habitual drug user around."
(Maguire comment:  The previous policy did that by detecting on the first test, ejecting on failure of rehab on the second. Reality is that long term rehabilitation success rates with habitual drug users are about 35%).  Even weight control is no
longer rigorously enforced, while failed Physical Fitness (PT) tests are blamed on the unit and bad junior leaders.

* On the war-fighting ethos: Many NCOs maintained that many of their soldiers would run, if faced by a determined enemy
force.   The lowest number the CW5 recalled was around 25%. "Half of the female troops and about a third of the male
troops actually believe that the Army shouldn't be focused on war."

* On taking care of the troops: Today's soldiers believe the military should be focused on taking care of them. "The only
difference between 50% of our Army and welfare recipients on the outside is we wear uniforms."

* On senior NCOs: "Our Sergeants Major used to take care of soldiers. Now they have turned into enlisted generals. (Maguire:
enlisted Robert Mugabes, actually)  I am sick of hearing E9s talk about how they are taking care of our troops while playing
pseudo commander. First Sergeants used to be real soldiers and set the example, now they answer with their titles, and not their
names. Since when did 1SGs become royalty? (Maguire note:  since a block check titled "Supports Equal Opportunity" became part of officers' efficiency reports.  It takes about 25 years to make E9.  2001 less 25 years = 1976 and the effective start of that crap).

The old trooper concluded his letter: "I have tried to fight the good fight. I have always chosen doing the right thing over the party
line and I have made a few friends in my 35 years. Given a choice, I would not change anything I have done, but I don't see a
light at the end of the tunnel."

The attentive reader will have noticed that old war horse's consistent emphasis on sexual fault lines in Shinseki's 'Army of One' and statistics that would otherwise describe the Army's non-white composition.   This Chief Warrant's report also describes a force that is already short of manpower (using that term loosely).

    "Maguire"

If someone places his photo, opinions, and other stuff on the internet, then it becomes public and any criticism of that material does not constitute a personal attack. Only a spineless mama's boy would view it that way. Besides, if a person goes into emotional tantrums when he is called a name, of what use do you really think he'd be in a real, live, kick-him-in-the-nuts, battle? Not much I am afraid for he'd be too concerned about soiling the lace on his underwear.

One variety of iron sulfide (pyrite) so closely resembles gold that many people cannot tell the difference. But differences do exist which can be discovered. If one's eyes fail in this regard, there are other tests. This is where the blightwing fails on all counts. Some have weak eyes and couldn't tell a buzzard from a goose, judging by what they choose to sleep with. There are others who simply refuse to look any deeper and slough it off with some " a black horse is one which is black" nonsense. This is why I openly challenge all of the blightwing gods to allow me to post THEIR DEFINITION of what is white, here on miserable old FAEM. If they will not, or cannot, perform this undemanding task, then they should cease yapping about "saving the white race" and I'll never acknowledge their existence again. If you still chose to listen to people who cannot tell you what they mean by "white", then good luck, for disappointment lies in your future.

Gentlemen -- Whether they are white or not, I'm not in favor of promoting 'babes' or 'hunks' as exemplars of our people.  As near as I can tell most of the so-called 'beautiful people' are race traitors.  Everything is overly skewed toward physical looks, anyway.  I say, "handsome is as handsome does."
*** No argument from me.

Mr. Frenz -- Did you know that Strom has been writing to others about you behind your back? Not nice things either.
*** No, I wasn't aware of that. He can do what he wants. Each man to his own jollies. If I made an error in fact, perhaps he could have shown exactly where I was so mistaken for I'd be only to glad to correct it.

To RF -- I don't think his (Kevin) wife is white. She looks mestiza to me. (A female wrote this, by the way.)
*** I didn't bother to take note of her photo since my point was that one shouldn't use mongrels as examples of white male beauty nor of jewesses as examples of white female beauty. Perhaps someone might like to ask both Stromberg's to define what is white. That would be a lesson in itself. I would never have commented upon this but it was brought to my attention by a young man with much better eyesight than Kevin's or Elisha's. He questioned the "whiteness" of the lovebirds' idols, particularly color-blind Elisha.

Sir -- Don't you think that revisionism has been valuable in our fight against the destroyers of our nation?
*** O yes. I notice that each time Mr. Irving publishes a book, the mexi-flood slows down. I also notice that each time retired Ernst shows up in a courtroom, the Chinese stop buying up North American property. And again, every time a revisionist conference is held, drug trafficking comes to a halt and the welfare load decreases. Give me a break.

Mr. Frenz -- Why is it that so many of the blight wing are against race mixing with blacks but seem to have mestizas or asians for girl friends and wives?
*** Probably because their nooky addiction preceded the establishment of their "principles". They dicked whom they pleased and then defined the "struggle" after the fact.

Robert -- How would you like it if someone called you names?
*** I'd run home to mother and cry on her lap, eat a cookie, and then ask God to punish all of those naughty, naughty people.

If you cannot call a son-of-a-bitch a son-of-a-bitch, then what's the value of the First Amendment? Are we to accept what ZOG is doing its best to impose -- that only 'non-offensive' speech is covered by the F.A.? This is a g.d. dirty war and any silly dick who thinks it will be won by belching a few "white pride" farts and behaving in a gentlemanly manner, is only a silly clown who has already lost. That's one of the reasons we continue to go down hill! The greater danger is that we allow such people to yammer about "white" and they cannot even define it. I readily admit that I have a THEORY relative to race and it can be applied with result. It differs from that of Eric's, but at least he also has CRITERIA. I might be 'far out' but damnit, I can give you an answer which I have yet to hear from any of the blightwing crowd. We've even got one dork who thinks there are "black caucasians." When pressed, he slithers about indicating that he doesn't know what the f--- he is talking about.

Why not have all of the self-anointed "leaders" DEFINE, in a condensed version, what they mean by "white" and post those results, as a group, on every site possible? None of this "I speak only for myself" cop-out or "Anyone is white who feels white" bullcrap. Once done, we could let the readers decide which definitions have the most substance. Does it seem unreasonable for any of us to KNOW EXACTLY what it is we are trying to save?

If a man steals from you. I am concerned. I do not feel that it's none of my business, for it is my business when someone is screwing up the society in which I live. We are only a disjoint group of jerks if we think that everything is permissible as long long as sh-- doesn't fall upon us personally.

Eric was commenting about the "stacked female' who has recently been cozening up to him. Being quite astute in these matters, he knows full well that this woman's entire goal in life is to be worked over by as many male appendages as possible. He mentioned that he could hear the little snapping teeth of the various virus and bacteria which obviously made a home in her private channel. He told me he always kept her at arms length. What a silly man was he for refusing all of that free stuff.

In spite of the young women who complain about the lack of "real men", I still place the burden in their laps.  In the reproduction business, women are far superior to men. Why don't they try acting like this sometime? If it catches on, they'd be surprised at how quickly the young men shape up. It's the honey who attracts the bee. I never pursued any woman for any reason. I never required any woman to "chase" me. When I got that "eye" signal, I responded. And away went the trolley.

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010612/wl/rights_children_soldiers_dc.html

Here's yet another coming socially progressive benefit from the immigration mud flood diversification of the Late Great U.S.A.  CHILD SOLDIERS!  Yes, you too can look forward to the precious 1.2 children you had in your late 30s being drafted at the ages of 12-14 and hurled into combat for the benefit of tribal chieftains and head bulls.  According to this report BRIT-ZOG has already retrogressed down that road.

That all comes as no surprise all to us.  You can still breath a big sigh of relief we evil white men aren't running things anymore, wymyns.  Back in the First War to Kill White People circa 1918 the U.S. Army set a lower age limit of 20.  Judeo-Marxist progressivism got that age lowered to 18 in the Second War to Kill White People. 

QUOTE -- Hi,  I've been reading your site for a while now and find it generally informative and helpful.  I have a few things I've been  meaning to write you about for a while but haven't had the time so I apologize if this email seems to be all over the place.

First of all, what is your deal with the Stroms? You seem to have singled them out for abuse for some reason.  I've seen you attack them before. I have not singled them out for any personal reason. Our struggle is above the personal level. I have no reason to dislike Kevin and he has been very helpful to me in the past. My point was that both of the Storms use jew quotes and photos of mongrels to illustrate 'white' whatever. THIS IS BLATANT DISINFORMATION! I had hoped by exposure that those two would clean up their act for both are well qualified to contribute to the non movement "movement". Again, THERE IS NO UNITY IN THE WHITE ARENA and so accusing me of trying to destroy something which does not exist is simply ludicrous and asinine. A few 6 or 7 member local gripe units doesn't not constitute organization even if they use a fancy name for themselves. Joining some internet "white pride" group also does not constitute organization even if you hold a dues-paying card membership. Granted, I do agree that they are a little self indulgent and all that mushy gushy "dedication" stuff to each other is a little adolescent, but I don't see why you feel the need to trash them. I am willing to learn how their personal obsessions contribute to instruction. Perhaps they might include an orgasm score chart to complete the site but of what value would that be except to depreciate any other contribution that might offer. Kevin's Dr. Oliver material is excellent and I applaud it. If I tell someone his fly is open, that should not be misconstrued to mean that everything is out of place. Young white people today have absolutely no idea of the struggle they are in or even what battles consist of. If, while under fire, your comrade insists upon beating his meat while drooling at a photo of his naked girl friend, then I ask how that contributes to the defense of your position. I have yet to visit a perfect site.  Just about every pro white site has "issues,"  technical, ideological or general knowledge which that they could improve on.  My main beef with Kevin has been his inappropriate tendency to post galleries of young girls, apparently all between 12-15 years old, as paragons of white feminine beauty.  While the girls certainly are pretty, I don't think that it's indicative of a mentally healthy adult  able to sit around pining over such girls. You have proved my point. I could have corresponded politely but "E" nailed me with a nasty letter -- unfounded in fact, first, and I saw little to be gained by addressing people who would have ignored me anyway. Vanity, you know.... He has rectified this situation since the last time I visited there however.  If you have a personal beef with them then that's your business.  Generally however, I just don't think that its helpful for pro white activist to be attacking one another.  Any cassette player can issue pro white noises but that does not make them "activists". Whether we 'attack' each other is irrelevant. We simply do not have ANY organization capable of engaging in this cosmic war. Without organization, we would still not amount to a hill of fava beans EVEN IF WE AGREED ABSOLUTELY ON ALL MATTERS. Only our enemies benefit from that.  If you don't like him or his site, you could always just  ignore him. How can anyone interested in the welfare of his people IGNORE those who are crapping on the oatmeal?  If the enemy is charging, would you ignore the machinegun team who was busy buggering each other? I'd shoot the bastards! At the least, if you feel these issues have to be addressed, then speak in a general manner without specifying the target. Again, of what use is "someone is pissing in someone's gas tank."? Or, an air force order to bomb "something". You select a target and then nail it!!! Is this hard to understand? What good is any rifle shot if there exists no specific target?

On other matters, I pretty much agree with you.  I'm really getting sick of the right wingers trying to out do each other in their condemnation of Tim McVeigh. What they are really trying to do is win brownie points from the left (a wasted effort) and hope that no one figures out that many of the complaints that McVeigh listed against the government as motive for his actions were standard Republican complaints up until the bombing.  Now they are all trying to sound "tough" by claiming, as the ridiculous Bill O'Reilly did, that the death penalty was "too easy," or calling him the "most hated man in America," as Jew neo-con Matt Drudge-- a jew mimicking another jew, WWII radio mouth Walter Winchell -- did. These people make me want to vomit. The fact is that Drudge, O'Reilly, Goldberg, Limbaugh or any of the Jew approved conservatives would have been blubbering uncontrollably and would have lost all bladder and bowel control had they been in McVeigh's position.  You can say that again!! McVeigh had more guts, integrity, honor and character than the whole pathetic lot put together.  I think his actions were ill advised, absolutely if only because they worked against him and the cause, but I admire him greatly.  He was a doer and we need more like him. I cannot but agree more.

Also, You said the other day that people with brown eyes "aren't white." I said that brown eyes were not a white characteristic. Show me where I said that people with brown eyes were not white. I also said that we can call anyone white if their yellow/black racial contamination does not exceed 5%, that's about 5 generations, and that includes brown eyes. Surely you were jesting.  Brown eyed people most certainly are white. Go to Iceland, or eastern Norway, two of the whitest places on earth, and you can still find people with brown eyes who can trace their lineage back hundreds of years.  I said that the eye color contamination was ANCIENT, not a few generations ago. Brown is dominant and a little goes a very, very long way and it will appear, and reappear, over the generations as sure as muds line up for welfare checks. Frankly, I don't see the point of making such statements even if you believed they were true.  Do you have a problem with truth which is not to your liking? Would you do anyone a favor by not telling him the truth about his cancer? Ignorance might be bliss, but it is deadly. An Aryan characteristic is his frankness -- an openness without apology. Do not fall into the trap of only saying nice things about 'us' and bad things about 'them'. If I find something commendable in the jew, and I have, I will say so. As a blue eyed Keltic Nordic I am happy to have all the brown eyed people on my side. We will need them to help us fight back.  I don't think its a good idea to turn away people like that from the cause.

One more item you might find amusing, though please don't use the specific names if you pass this on  ---CUT--- One of my professors went to an historically black college  ---CUT--- to help train some teachers there.  They surveyed all of the declared majors in the hard sciences (physics, math, chemistry, etc.) and discovered that 40% of these undergraduates could not correctly solve the equation 1/3 - 1/4 = ?  I am not surprised. Is that not hilarious?  Moreover, when the NSF (National Science Foundation) allocated moneys to various historically black colleges so that their students could attend a science  conference in ---CUT--- during ---CUT--- ( a very good deal since the student only pays $50 and the NSF picks up the rest of the  $2500 plus price tag per student for the trip ) many of these students were so disruptive that they were informed that they will not be invited back. From what I understand, the black students from Mississippi were the worst. They used the NSF provided courtesy van to ride around ---CUT--- at 3 a.m., broke furniture and disrupted speakers during the event.

Truly, we are "trying to teach penguins to fly." O yes. Monkeys in suits trained to ride bicycles around on a stage. How nice -- until someone tosses peanuts and bananas on the stage. Most blacks are not comfortable acting as if they were white. When stress comes in, their white behavior goes out as many foolish race-mixing females soon discover. Who really thinks the O.J. business was atypical? a fluke?

Thank you for your excellent remarks.

Brain-dead white females will break their buns helping out the muds of the world, even to the point of adopting them -- thus insuring the displacement of more white people -- but will never help one of their own kind. Although I never expected much, my request for donations payable to the Arthritis Foundation, to help a young honest and very, very white couple enter a competition, was very dismal. You see, I didn't promise to save someone's ass from something or do their dirty work for them. All I requested was a ONE WAY act of GIVING and honkies simply cannot bring themselves to act outside of their infantile and selfish motives - what's in it for me? The sad thing is that there still exists a very small group of hard-working white people who simply do not deserve the coming calamities which their traitorous co-racial whites are now bringing to fruition.

If ostensible white people have to list mongrels as representative "classic" whites, then they are indeed in need of sympathy. By the way, the big "E" also uses quotes from feminist jewesses. She is a typical blightwinger with questionable blood lines, if her photos are any indication..

At the funerals, of my mother, and his most beloved son, my brother, dad was seen with watery eyes.

For both men, I, and all of us, never doubted for one second the intense, and deep, sorrow which they felt for the loss of their loved ones. We children cried and the women sobbed lightly. There were no hysterical demonstrations nor trauma which needed candles and counseling with a thousand towels. We did our best to remain composed during very difficult times. All of us struggled with this burden. None missed a day of work nor of school except for the day of the funerals. I can remember no one who wailed for weeks and we intelligently did not have subsequent "birthdays" in sad memory of the departed. What was, was gone, and we went on the best we could. Dad always reminded, "There's nothing like work to get your mind off your problems."

In today's childish, feminized, jewdazed, niggerized and loony society, people such as my parents and grandparents would have been labeled cold and feelingless -- monsters!!! -- because they never let their emotions dictate their lives. Today, we are expected to have emotional breakdowns even when people we never met, nor heard of before, die somewhere, sometime. This is why a handful of Israelis dying during a wedding -- probably due to defective building engineering, cost cutting and incompetent slave labor --  instantly became a "national tragedy." True to form, this mini-holocaust will probably be the object of a wailing session next year -- maybe even a Spielberg dogmadrama featuring gravity in the 'anti Semite' role.

Tim McVeigh, a good man who got on a wrong bus, met his end in a very masculine manner. To the children of both sexes, and the women of both sexes, he certainly must rank as very cold-blooded since he wasn't dragged screaming and bawling -- as most of his tormentors would be if in the same circumstance -- to the place of his death.

"I can't stand to see a woman cry," said John Wayne in one of his movies. This crying act has been a weapon in a woman's arsenal for centuries. It's even used by the jews when they want you to believe one of their holocaust yarns. A story, otherwise rejected by analysis, becomes instantly believable if accompanied by a Red Sea of tears. The norm is now the cry-baby.

Well, whitey, full of newly found glad tiding for the disadvantaged and oppressed, goes home.

Do the grass grunts then use the examples of the white man to build up his country? Hell no, Eskimo. They follow whitey back to whitey's homeland where they demand entrance because of "eeeeequality" and "blubbery lub" and "weez both gots the same genome as do de rhubarb."

Whitey now sees the error of his ways, open the gates and let's the mud shine through. Now settling in enclaves, the grass grunts again come into conflict with whitey's rules. They again demand that they want to rule themselves and that whitey should "go home and leave them alone." But whitey is home -- at least for a little while longer.

This is the story of grass grunt colonization of white lands.... and the beat goes on.