Hip, hip, hooray! Starvation is one of the many benefits of Black rule. There's no need for special diets in order to stay thin.

Yes, my fine feather-brained citizens, after you've blown the $500M on soybean burgers and Nigerian fries, what do you think will happen after the feeding frenzy is over? That's right! They'll be hungry again and gas what? During the interim,  hundreds more will be born -- a good meal gives one energy to do a little more sausage poking. That means ye olde $500M will not do the job next time and THERE WILL BE A NEXT TIME! It's do-gooder heaven. They breed. We feed. That is, until WE start going hungry. Why not ask those kindly multimillionaires Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and Billy Graham to feed them? They have the money and they, as second in command to god, love them. I am broke and I don't love them.

The July 1, 2002 version of the FAEM ad libitum archive ( http://www.faem.com/adlib/c0701.htm ) contains a reference to this study (http://www.rense.com/general26/semenacts.htm ) on the effects of male sperm on females beyond simple impregnation.

As Robert has said, there's a body of experimentally observed fact but not much theoretical work yet.  The presupposition of such work is inherently opposed to ZOG's sexual relations agenda.  In an environment where universities regularly conduct freshman indoctrination designed to normalize homosexuality and bisexuality, modern academics know telegony is not something that will further their careers.  A fear of pursuing some scientific avenue of inquiry because of prevailing political climate, or actively suppressing lines of inquiry because of political theory, is generically called "Lysenkoism"

Lysenkoism arose in the late great JewSSR during the battle between Lamarckism and gene based ideas of reproduction.  Lamarckism is a long disproved theory of heredity that rejected a genetic based model of reproduction.  This theory proposed that organisms could transmit to future generations environmentally acquired characteristics.  In the 1930s, a group of Soviet scientists, spearheaded by Trofim Denisovich Lysenko, became the leading proponents of this school of thought.  Another group of biologists rejected Lamarckism and instead favored a genetic-selection based view of reproduction and evolution.

This scientific biological battle struck at the very foundations of Marxist theory and the publicly offered theoretical justification for Judeo-Communism .  Backed by Judeo-Communist methods, Lysenko's group not only became preeminent but also managed to suppress their opposition.  Their academic opponents were prevented from publishing, dismissed from their posts and often physically sent off to Gulag.  The incorrigible genetic-heredity/selection school of biologists proved the correctness of their theories by failing to adapt to Gulag conditions as predicted by Lamarckism.  They instead died, generally without offspring.

Lysenko-ism was eventually abandoned in Soviet agronomy but not before some spectacular crop failures resulting from planting seeds on top of snow.

I mention this because Lysenkoism itself is alive and well in ZOG Academe.  There was a recent example of the post-publication recall of a Human Immunology article that offended the Jews because it contradicted their lies.  This extreme 1984ish incident was a result of editorial incompetence.  Consider for a moment all the articles spiked, or never even written, all the proposals never made, the studies never funded, the study proposals never written because of fear of offending against the prevailing Power.

Unfortunately we often can't give the most spectacular examples of the insidious effects of this intellectual reign of terror without violating personal confidences.  But it is a real force behind the scenes exerting a direct influence on your daily lives.

"Maguire"

Robertsez -- Observation comes first. Observation comes first. Observation comes first. What is observed is fact and you do not need a Ph.D. degree to understand that. Observation is fact. The trouble with the scientific dicks, and I know many of the high-powered ones, is that they use mathematics as a device of proof, which it isn't. Math is usually used in an attempt to describe something and if it does a good job, it is then used to predict. If the predictions appear to come true, then the silly bastards flip the pancake and use mathematics to prove what they assumed. The entire scientific world appears to be afflicted with this ass-backwards view of things. (It's jewish, you know.) No wonder we are deluged with 'black holes', 'worm holes', 'sink holes', 'ass holes', and 'corn holes'. A "day of the long knives" would help clear the air in this matter.

A writer sees another man who is tolerant of everything, attempt to swim with alligators (Kevin Kostner Y ?). The alligators enjoy a nice lunch. The writer describes the whole affair in a prize-winning essay appearing in Jock Strap magazine. The essay was not the reason the swimmer stopped swimming. The label is not the product. Get it?

http://english.pravda.ru/main/2002/07/04/31794.html

Israel and USZOG are kissing cousins, but Israel IS NO ALLY OF THE AMERICAN WHITE PEOPLE. If Israel kills a few of your sons, then USZOG cares less since it does the same thing. Whether Israel or USZOG, we White folks are merely fodder -- useful idiots, as it were. Bushez cares no more about the White working man than does his spiritual brother Sharon.

Anyone who denigrates the institution of marriage would be audacious indeed if he were to also claim he was interested in the survival of the White race.

http://volokh.blogspot.com/2002_07_07_volokh_archive.html#85224300

"DO YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY WHOM YOU WANT FOR A ROOMMATE? In California, you apparently don't. On May 7, the California Fair Employment & Housing Commission penalized Melissa DeSantis $500 for inflicting "emotional distress" on a would-be roommate by allegedly telling him that "I don't really like black guys. I try to be fair and all, but they scare me." It also required her to pay him $240 in expenses -- and take "four hours of training on housing discrimination." (See Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. DeSantis, 2002 WL 1313078, Case Nos. H 9900 Q-0328-00-h, C 00-01-180, 02-12 (Cal. FEHC May 7, 2002).) Interestingly, I've seen no published accounts of this incident  (Maguire:  psst attention SETI researchers, follow above link)  -- I dug it up using a query that I periodically run on a very obscure administrative agency database."

And you snot-nosed smart-mouth bitches thought we were fooling around about all this.  This decision is literally a bedroom door away from requiring women to sleep with niggers or be held legally liable.  After all, wouldn't a refusal there also "inflict emotional distress" on the Jews' precious negroes. i.e. the 'dicks with legs'?

Robertsez -- I have no reason to change my mind on ZOG's direction when it comes to the destruction of the White race. If there are not enough stupid sex-obsessed women mating with simians, then monetary incentives for doing so will be forthcoming -- a sort of mercenary approach. If that won't do it, then laws will come about requiring race-mixing. In the 1960s, I used to write articles in the "Crystal Ball" concerning the upcoming decades. People mentioned I was "outrageous". It has all come to pass.

As a kid, I heard some of the older boys talk about "Fats" the local pervert. Fats, I was told, liked to "mouth" the sexual parts of little girls and little boys. One thing I remembered, according to the older kids, is that Fats always whispered into his victim's ear, "I am going to ruin you." That expression always puzzled me since I saw no physical evidence of "ruin" in those who visited him. Fats always paid his victims and that probably was a great lure since ours was a very, very poor neighborhood. Anyway, years later I knew what the "ruin" was -- it was psychological. In that context, Fats was one evil son-of-a-bitch and that was probably the reason my father had no use for the man. We were told to avoid Fats. Dad gave no reason but we did have reason to obey him. Kids did not run his family. That was a benefit which took me 25 years to appreciate.

I am well aware that the word "control" invokes images of being threatened with a mace, torture chambers, swinging axes, broken legs and such -- control equals fear as the harpies claim.

A sea Captain controls the men which direct his ship. There is nothing abusive in the relation. The Captain has control because he HAS THE POWER TO INFLICT PUNISHMENT upon the disobedient. There is NO OTHER WAY to perform this community task. If all had equal voice, and misdeeds went unpunished, then what sort of voyage would you imagine? Pure chaos. Committees never perform tasks. They yammer incessantly -- hot air sparring -- and when a job is to be done, it's assigned to one man who eventually directs and takes complete responsibility.

The article -- http://www.rense.com/general26/antifather.htm -- points out a reason for the behavior of some men relative to marriage. No one argues that we have an ample supply of irresponsible young men out there who see women as only objects of sexual gratification with the idea of potential motherhood completely absent from their simian brains. In a land where sex has been devalued and where it is no longer the highest expression of the love of two people, but merely an entertainment commodity to be shared and shuffled, it is no wonder "family" ever gets past the rutting stage.

The handicaps imposed upon the White male are pervasive but many naive people still assume that we operate on the merit system of the past. Not true, for merit has been shown to be discriminatory and biased. I do not know about you, but if I wanted a fireman to rescue me I'd choose a muscular 200 pound man to carry me down the ladder rather than be fumbled and dropped by a 100 pound equal opportunity 5 foot female. Perhaps an example is in order. The following is from the physical standards section of procedures for selecting Police Officer candidates.

Muscular endurance for 30 year olds as measured by bent-leg sit-ups -- Male 35, female 25.
Muscular strength as measured by a bench press -- Male 100% of body weight, female 50%.
1.5 mile run, minimum time in minutes -- Male 13, female 16. That's 7 MPH vs. 5½ MPH.
(Who would be better at chasing a crook?)

Consider a 175 pound man and a 116 pound woman. The man is required to bench press at least 175 lbs. and the woman, 58 pounds. A bench press is a movement where the person lies prone on a bench and moves a barbell from his chest upward to full arm length. The standards claim that both are equal but really folks, which person would be the more effective at subduing a troublesome culprit? One who could press 58 pounds or one who could press 175 pounds?

If it were required that all candidates, regardless of race, gender, blah, blah, blah, had to bench press their own weight, how many females do you think would be acceptable police officer candidates? Nary a one, I'd wager. But what does this mean? It means that strength tests are biased in favor of men. The tests are discriminatory and discrimination is against the law. The "system" is more mad than the Hatter in Alice in Wonderland.

I used to ride the bus from my job with a railroad section gang to home. That run also had a very good looking young woman usually seated in the back. I found her quite appealing and made her acquaintance. After several dates, I found we "hit it off" nearly 100%. Being a young man with the usual itch, a situation arose where she pushed me away, smiled and said, "Yes, that will all be very nice but the goodies will really have to wait until marriage." I understood and fully agreed, that is, my brain agreed but my other end did not. I thought about that for a day or so and then ended the dating. She was a wonderful girl and I sometimes regretted not being mature enough at the time to fully appreciate what the fates dropped in my lap.

My point here is that in a White society, woman have always enjoyed special privileges. They were the ones who dictated whether intimacy would be allowed and thereby providing a stabilizing factor relative to the "sow your wild oats" drive of the immature male. Doors used to be opened for women and men would give up their bus seats. In my childhood neighborhood, any person laying one finger upon anyone's sister, or mother, would soon be taught the error in that. But alas, somewhere along the line women wanted to traipse the alleys with the men. They wanted "equality" which was a way of throwing away their advantages and today they complain about the resultant efects of "equal" interactions. Today many want to be treated as women without having to behave as women.

A society of "party girls", Playboy Y sluts, and career types, is a society which will not last very long. Motherhood is perhaps the most demanding of any "career" a person might have. Maybe that's why many young girls avoid it.

As the potato bug destroys both the potato and the potato field, because it is its nature to do so, so does the jew destroy people and nations.

Suppose that a bounty was placed upon all border hoppers, say $5000 per head, and I mean that literally. Would this effect the mud invasion?

To my surprise, a Black girl was asked why her pimp beat her up. She replied that her assigned "trick" was a White man and she refused to "do it" with White people. Now there's a Black girl with some racial sense. I can live with that.

The kosher crap, similar to that surrounding the phony Einstein Y, relates that David Sarnoff Y , of RCA, invented television. The fact is that an Idaho farm boy, Philo T. Farnsworth, gave the first successful demonstration on September 7, 1927. Big bucks Sarnoff waged a war of dirty tricks, propaganda and endless litigation. Thanks to the lost years of the SWATKWP and financial woes as a result of legal battles, Farnsworth's patents ran out and the hebe fix was in.

When you invite buzzards to dine, expect a lot of silverware to vanish.

It certainly can be anticipated that when the anniversary of 9-11 approaches the loonies will be driven into a frenzy of paranoia. Of course it's also possible that on that date an attack will be initiated against Iraq, just to get even for 9-11. There's not a day that goes by that the national insanity is evidently becoming  more severe, with the masses seeking  great victories against small insignificant countries, and the world trembles when King George makes an earth shaking announcement or General Colon Powell states his loyalty to Israel and calls for the ouster of Arafat, while he quietly feuds with the Defense Department over the coming war with Iraq which he probably opposes.  Mr. Rumsfeld and Condalizza Rice of course are very quiet as they are heavily involved in the  planned joy ride into Baghdad.

In the final analysis it really is sad that our country ever let the Jews get such a strangle hold on this once great land, for they  have created a multitude of  problems both internal and external.
Joe.

I cannot understand how any normal white person can buy into what amounts to savage lore with its magic potions, bizarre "meditating" positions, pierced noses and ears, and all sorts of wild witch doctor hocus pocus which apparently never benefited the ape which convinced them that it was the "way to go". We simply do not need the "folk medicine" or advice, of any collection of non whites.

I was also told that the species C. gnou and C. taurinus are interfertile. I remember that one of the criteria for species was the lack of interfertility across the "species barrier". Since nickers and honkies can produce mongrels, this was once once used as "proof" that they were of one species, H. sapiens. No, B and W are not of the same species. Never have been all b.s. to the contrary. Besides, names prove nothing anyway. Why is it that "science" usually takes years to come to the same conclusion as the working man whose "gut" instinct revealed the truth almost immediately? The purpose of modern education is to short circuit your natural instincts and replace them with ZOG-approved hogwash.

You are not losing your country, you say? Why not go to L.A. and wander about. It won't be long before some mestizo says, "What are you doing here, gringo?" White people are considered foreigners in many areas of this land. Gringos not wanted. Still, the airheads consider it "chic", "mod", or whatever, to help elect people not of their race. It's like buying the rope for one's executioner and offering to pay for his kid's education.

One should note, that in both the U.S. and Britain, the white rulers allied themselves with jews against their own people.

As white man captured this and slaughtered that, he began to wonder about the forms of animal life. Some had bones and others didn't. Thus a categorization developed -- vertebrates and invertebrates. Among the vertebrates, it was observed that some were cold blooded and others warm blooded. Some of the warm blooded vertebrates had feathers and laid eggs. Some of the warm blooded vertebrates gave live birth and suckled their young with milk glands. This last sort of critter was called a mammal.

It seemed simple at first until it was discovered that not all critters sporting feathers could fly and some mammals laid eggs. There were even some flying mammals. Further, not all mammals had legs but swam in the sea. As more and more information was discovered, the more confusing it all became and today, there are so many arguing "schools of thought" that one necessarily must choose sides and become a believer and ready to kill opponents, Amen!

The confusion over names and 'pigeon holes' is really not of much importance but the intellectual nonsense which pervades all of it is that the classification is being used as PROOF of relationship. If critter A resembles critter B, then A and B are DEFINED as being related and given similar names -- Canis lupus and Canis latrans, wolf and coyote, for example. Be alert and notice that the DEFINITION is used as a PROOF of relationship. The assumption becomes the proof. Slapping the moniker Homo sapiens on everything able to stand erect and yodel, defines them as being related. (They must be related, so give them similar names.) Thus, blacks and whites are related because their classification names say they are. This is what's called a tautology -- an empty or vacuous statement composed of simpler statements in a fashion that makes it logically true whether the simpler statements are factually true or false. "Science" is loaded with such hot air. An intellectual needs hot air in order to breathe, and assure the continuation of his research grants. A working man knows that blacks and whites are not related and pays no heed to the hypothesis of a common ancestor -- the missing link, and boy, it sure is missing. The THEORY of evolution is just another wild-eyed religion.

BTW -- this biological classification business is a white thing, as is most everything else since day uno. White folks NEED NOTHING from non whites so it's about time we stopped kissing their behinds, wouldn't you say?

About the "studies" evidence: That cuts no ice with me since they all prove their assumptions in typical kosher fashion. The "study" which revealed that the blacks in Africa, who ate the most fiber, had the lowest incidence of colon cancer. What they didn't tell you was that they also had the highest incident of stomach ulcers and stomach cancer. That wasn't mentioned since is was not a premise.

Wasn't it Mahatma Gandhi who drank his own urine because it was a "healthy" thing to do? It must have been true since I observed what a fine handsome physical specimen he was. I bet he could bench press at least 300 pounds, eh? Health, to me, is not epitomized in any likeness of the sage played by Sam Jaffe Y in the Shangri-la of Lost Horizon -- the Ronald Coleman version. One only needs to look at the photos of average high school athletes of the 1940's as compared to the effeminate flab asses of today, in order to see the difference of diet from high animal protein, in the 1940s,  to the carbohydrates and edible crud concoctions of today.

Note that the observable racial differences imply different nutritional aspects. Why do so many have skin the color of shit? Is it what they eat?

We are now trying to inflict the insanity of the "experts" upon our pet dogs by feeding them peas, carrots and corn as a "well balanced" diet. The reason meat has to be down played is that it is an expensive way to feed the growing hordes of useless eaters on this planet. It is of no surprise that those termite mounds called China and India, have a very low intake of animal protein per capita.

Why do people continually upset themselves by returning, again and again, to these pages which distress them so. Methinks they have a brain problem. Too many vegetables? Too much buggering? Too much niggerball?