Fri, 29 Jun 2001
A few days ago I had an extended discussion with
a very intelligent, albeit semitically correct, conservative-libertarian
free thinking professor of political science. That debate has since
grown into this article.
I have no doubt many self-righteous GOP kosher-correct
conservatives give FAEM the once or twice over. After that they leave shaking
their heads and clucking their tongues over our 'narrow views' or 'unawareness'
of the wonderful racially diverse world of Limbaugh-Gingrich-Kemp 'conservatism'.
This wonderful 'melting pot' of conservative people of all races will soon
sweep the country!
The GOP Limbaugh conservative points to people like
Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams and others and says "See! There are
good negroes. You white separatists are all wrong! You're also
evil racists and Holocaust Deniers and (fill in the blank)". We certainly
do serve a useful purpose in allowing kosher-correct conservatives to vent
their rage at someone. This helps them feel like they are still men
since their masters prohibit them from vilifying their real tormentors.
Well, we'll see who is really unaware. Maguire
is very aware that this world of negro 'conservatives' includes such extremely
capable economists as Walter Williams and Thomas Sowell. Here's
an excellent recent article by Sowell on the political use of faked statistics
in the mass media (we're aware of a far larger use of faked statistics
post-SWATKWP):
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/ts20010628.shtml
Sowell previously has written on why even negro
cab drivers in New York also 'racially profile' in avoiding negro fares,
especially at night. It's because male negro passengers are the leading
perpetrators of armed robberies that often escalate into cab driver murder.
Here's an even more 'radical' negro woman named
Elizabeth Wright: http://www.issues-views.com/
She's written very cogent articles on the injustice of denying Matt Hale
a law license (http://www.issues-views.com/FreeSpeechForSome.shtml
) and Alex Curtis as a prisoner of conscience (http://www.issues-views.com/PunishingWhiteNationalists.shtml
) and how white nationalists are persecuted while black nationalists are
subsidized. She has another article about the inherent incorrectness
of Brown v Board of Education. http://www.issues-views.com/issue-e.shtml
Her entire website is worthy of extended study,
and especially the sections about Marcus Garvey.
Now if such individuals were representative of even
40% of the negro race then our conceptions of racial separatism would have
to be seriously reexamined. And there is the fallacy Limbaugh style
whites fall into. People like Williams, Sowell and Wright are only
speaking for themselves. Are negroes as a group becoming more conservative?
The voting results say not. Junior George got a lower percentage
of the negro vote in Y2K than his daddy did in 1992, and George Sr.'s own
negro vote was lower than Ronald Reagan's. The GOP's percentage of
the negro vote in fact declined throughout the 20th Century.
The central mass of negroes themselves respond to
Ice-T, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Robert Mugabe, Kweisi Mfume and
a host of others. These are the people who know how to strike the
inner emotional chords of the negro in the ghetto and manipulate him
as a political group. Operationally there has been a single result
whenever ANY area falls under negro rule. It immediately begins a
descent into barbarism (at least from a white perspective). This
is as true of Washington D.C. (self rule since revoked by the U.S. Congress
after Marion Barry) and Detroit as it is of Rhodesia and South Africa.
A recent FAEM article pointed up another new-old problem. This is
the persisting gap in academic ability between whites and negroes.
The
moment quantitatively measurable academic standards were reintroduced
in schools the white-negro performance gap instantly reappeared.
Politically and socially the negro race en masse
is simply not responding to the leadership of negro conservatives like
Wright, Sowell and Williams. It is certain the negro conservatives
have a larger following among whites than among negroes. Sowell,
Williams (a frequent Limblow stand in), Clarence Thomas and J.C. Watts
are thus not leading negroes at all. They are dependent on, supported
by and are leading GOP whites. Their rise is no cause for joy because
they do not presage a mass conversion of negroes to white morals or thinking.
There is an insult used by negroes themselves to
describe those such as Williams, Sowell, Watts and Company. They
call them "oreos", as in an oreo cookie. This epithet means such
people are "black on the outside and white on the inside". The implications
of this label, invented by negroes themselves to describe negroes deviating
from a self-perceived negro behavioral norm, deserves profound meditation
by white CONNEDservantives. The fact this insult exists means negroes
themselves perceive that there is such a thing as "black insides" and that
these "insides" differ profoundly from "white insides".
They will get no argument over this concept here at F.A.E.M. The
idea that the racial differences are more than skin deep is one point of
agreement we have with the vast mass of the negro community.
Are there highly intelligent negroes? Yes,
Virginia, there are. There are also unbelievably stupid Jews (Maguire
has known plenty) and also criminally violent low I.Q. whites.
The problem is not that Elizabeth Wright has dark skin. The problem
is that she is not representative of her race. If she were, then
FAEM probably wouldn't exist. She represents a tendency two standard
deviations to the right of the median central tendency of the negro population
at large. And there is the rub. As intelligent and moral as
she is, she cannot offset the damage done by the 49 Al Sharptons, Jesse
Jacksons and Ice-T's that follow in behind each example of an Elizabeth
Wright.
Elizabeth Wright is promoted by no one. One
reason for this is that she is aware of and occasionally outspoken about
the malign influence of organized Jewry upon the negro community.
Another reason is Mrs. Wright has definite black nationalist tendencies
of her own. The other more famous negro neo-conservatives do receive
heavy promotion. You can find most of them at the 'conservative'
Jewish World Review website.
Du-uh, I wonder why that is? Care to take
a wild guess, Limblow fans?
"Maguire"